Recent content by nobody99

LOL. I'm done with you. Have a nice life you clueless moron. (please, ban me for life already?!?!?)

I don't have to. After yesterday's ruling, I can pay people to assume for me :D

Ok, then short it. Not quite as confident now, or are you just talking trash?

None immediately prior. Many of my shares were purchased in the 4's and 5's. I've got 500 shares from 2000 that I paid 13-something for. I also bought some in the 8's after the appeals decision.

But here's the problem. Any replacement is also likely going to be held in contempt. So do you go through the expense only to have to replace them again, or do you just take your medicine and settle? Remember, there's a hearing in July for post-stay damages from April 2008. Judge Folsom has...

Wow. Really? You can't find the time to be bothered to read up on the case, the literally thousands of posts, and instead ask us? Thanks. Do you want a cup of coffee, too, sir?

There are a lot of people here who have a lot more time invested in understanding this case than you do. The facts speak for themselves. DISH was developing a DVR for the military and could not create a workable consumer-grade product. This fresh new company TiVo gets a meeting with DISH...

No, they don't. They only have to show that the software is only colorably different. And I suspect this is going to be MUCH easier since it probably uses the same source code. Finding all DVRS in contempt is going to be a slam dunk if Charlie refuses to reach an agreement with TiVo.

No, it supports your opinion that the court system is fundamentally flawed. For others, it might just validate our system of justice.

No, but you can bet its forthcoming soon.

jacmyoung, where are you? Helloooo?? :)

Yes, if they are not more than colorably different, the same permanent injunction applies. If they use the same software, they are not more than colorably different, and they will be ordered shut down.

I suspect those will be the subject of a new contempt motion very soon.

Judge Ward has significant experience in determining damage awards after finding of contempt. Hmmmm. Makes one wonder.

Uhh, what are you talking about "difficult for you." What was difficult for me? The decision? The one where I accurately predicted that the case would be transferred and you disagreed? Oh, I see, you think I was gone because I was suspend or something. Hahaha. Sorry jac, hate to...