Search results for query: *

Well, I'm not necessarily directly comparing mlb.tv/extra innings to RSN feeds. I'm just saying nobody buys mlb.tv or Extra Innings and never watches it. A lot of people buy (in the sense that it's including in their package) their RSN (and ESPN and FS1 and whatever) and never watch it. So...

To add to my point about RSNs eyes being bigger than their stomach. Consider the Extra Innings and MLB.tv offerings. The people that buy those packages... they want to watch baseball. Is there anybody that buys this package and then never watches a baseball game? (Maybe the super rich). But...

But it's not just $8.50 per month. It's probably upwards of $100/mo (if not more) for a TV package that includes that $8.50 to get the network. $12.75 is a lot less than $100/mo. Sure you get a lot more content for that $100/mo... but if it's content I don't watch... it's a waste of $100 (or...

This is what I've referred to as the ESPN problem before. ESPN's top execs like to look at their profit sheets "Holy Cow! We're wildly popular! We have over 70 billion subscribers! Let's start a dozen new ESPN networks!" But in actuality they might have 700 people actually watching the...

But wouldn't it really just be Comcast customers within the Chicago Cubs territory? If you live in say... Pittsburgh, if you want to watch the Cubs games you're going to get those games with Extra Innings or MLB.tv. I'm just really surprised that Sinclair did not develop an OTT delivery system...