Search results for query: *

I think he's talking about you, funny guy. You're the one who might as well add, "I made five figures on TiVo recently", to your signature line, since you already add it to practically every post. Talk about a peacock...

Yes, it is. What's even sadder is how proud he is of his measly little five figures. Perhaps if he really believed in his prognosticating abilities, he might have made some real money.

Evidence for absolutely everything he said is in HJF's decision earlier this week. Go read it, please. I think you'll find it's all there, including the gaming the system reference.

Actually, this makes a lot of sense. He's essentially saying that if their patents had not been stolen, they would have had more revenue, been profitable sooner, and been able to do more R&D, perhaps make strategic acquisitions, etc. For example, if TiVo had not had their patents stolen...

For the record, I never said moron, so don't put words in my mouth and try to get me banned. I'm doing my best to educate here, not bash you. As for the rest, I give up. I think the rest of the community understands what a stay is and why a judgment isn't actually final until a stay is...

Please see my post above explaining why you have this wrong. You are just confused about what time period is pre- versus post- judgment. On the damages front, would you please stop saying the same thing over again, when you've already been proven wrong. In fact, you've proved yourself wrong...

Ok, now I see where you are confused. You have the time periods of pre-judgment and post-judgment confused. While the period during the stay did happen after the judgment was rendered by HJF, the judgment was not final, as the appeal process was still going forward and the stay was on from the...

I'm sorry, I can't just let this go. You're deliberately confusing the issue, in my opinion, to try and confuse others. Look, this is real simple. There were 2 rates: Pre-judgement infringement and post-judgement infringement. The first was set by the jury, $25. HJF did say he thought that...

Respectfully, not everyone seems to be as familiar with it as they should be, as jacmyoung continues to post inaccurate information about it. I only posted the link because I didn't want to be accused of just making up facts without sourcing them. While that does seem to be reasonably common...

Here is the link to Paice... Paice v. Toyota Order (E.D. Texas April 17, 2009)

Wow, you just can't help it can you? How about you go READ the Paice decision and then talk? Here's a link for you, or anyone else you has the time. It turns out I can't post that link until after this post, as I have to have 3 posts. It will follow immediately. Jury rate in Paice was...

Just because I haven't posted before, doesn't mean I haven't been following the thread very closely, but I understand what you're saying. Trust me, I'm not here to troll, but merely to keep the record straight. I probably could have let someone else point it out, but I just couldn't let that...

OMG, are you kidding me? I don't know why I am so surprised about your continuing to spout nonsense like this. I shouldn't be, because you have been wrong about every legal reference you have made in this case so far. I just thought since the ruling just yesterday so clearly pointed out how...