Fox News is back
- Thread starter Stargazer
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 254
- Views 23K
- Status
Seriously? Not even just a tad?I don't think you get it at all. Most important, the women (and men) are all smart and qualified, Ailes wouldn't have it any other way. And, if you characterize the network's content as ultra-conservative, you must not be watching.
Every body has.
Evidently its in the job description and as was said here in their contracts. ( and has been)
Upon further searching you tube and google are full of this reference to the Fox pimps......
(IE: " move the laptop... I can't see her legs'" unquote from their leader on the strip ... Or in the office either one.
... Ah I mean journalism and journalist.
That article I found ( pasted and linked) it is the very first one that came up. (#1)
I said these 4 words into the tablet. = "fox news women legs" & the article was #1 in google images..
I'm from the south not Milwaukee so i was I supposed to know.
!:
Absolutely ridiculous .
Last edited:
Every body has.
Evidently its in the job description and as was said here in their contracts. ( and has been)
Upon further searching you tube and google are full of this reference to the Fox pimps......
(IE: " move the laptop... I can't see her legs'" unquote from their leader on the strip ... Or in the office either one.
... Ah I mean journalism and journalist.
That article I found ( pasted and linked) it is the very first one that came up. (#1)
I said these 4 words into the tablet. = "fox news women legs" & the article was #1 in google images..
I'm from the south not Milwaukee so i was I supposed to know.
!:
Absolutely ridiculous .
I was replying to the post about Sarah Palin's body parts. I thought that was clear when I included that post as a quote.
I'm already familiar with the FNC female anchor dress code. That's common knowledge.
It's always funny when people want to bash on FNC, they rely on clips from the satirical morning show. Still, that clip just looked like someone adjusting themselves. Leave it to the interwebz.....
But yes, fox has a lot of legs. Outnumbered should have just been called- Legs..... Lol.
The dispute is over. No one knows the details.
But yes, fox has a lot of legs. Outnumbered should have just been called- Legs..... Lol.
The dispute is over. No one knows the details.
It's hard to believe Dish actually had to pay money for this channel!
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/...-super-bowl-attendance-fails-miserably-video/
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/...-super-bowl-attendance-fails-miserably-video/
They get a lot of viewers, regardless of how you or I may feel about the content. Plus, Fox has a lot of other properties that Dish is interested in. And, let's not forget the lawsuit.
So, blonde bimbos in short skirts delivering opinionated news or not, it's a business decision that does make some sense.
Love this part:
The “source” Fox Business seems to have used for this ridiculous report seems to have been an article from a “contributor” on Forbes.com, which has since been edited to remove pretty much all talk of actual attendance figures at the games which made up a large chunk of the original unedited article. In fact, the article’s author clarified himself in a response on the site, stating, “The basis of the story was in terms of the amount of fans traveling to Arizona for the game, not actually attending the game itself. I probably shouldn’t have cited attendance figures either since that really confused matters.”
Be careful what you wish (thirst for, demand ,moan about and about and switch providers) for people!
Wow....
Pretty much guaranteed these "bimbos" are far more educated than most interwebz commentators. more successful as well.
Not more educated, just Teleprompter-ed.
The Five’s Beckel to Guilfoyle: If Your Legs Were…A Foot Shorter Do You Think You'd Be Here?"
Eating their own young.
Eating their own young.
His post had a hint of common sense and rational thinking that has been missing in many of these threads.
I was not referring to the term bimbo itself, and if you read back the past few pages I think it is fairly obvious why the term was used in the post I quoted.
n December 2006, News Corporation announced its intention to transfer its 38.5% controlling interest in The DirecTV Group, four regional Fox Sports Net stations and $550 million cash to Liberty Media in exchange for Liberty's 19% interest in News Corp., giving the Murdoch family [http://i] tighter control of the latter firm.[34] The deal, valued at $11 billion, was approved by News Corp. shareholders in April 2007.[35] Following revisions that increased the cash offer to $625 million in exchange for a reduction of Liberty's divested interest in News Corp. to 16%, the swap was completed on February 27, 2008 following FCC approval.
--------
Rup and Malone
The Media devils
So maybe some of these defendants here ARE with the wrong provider??
- Status
