Echostar 18 Launch Approx 4:15 EDT June 18 2016

Foxbat

Addicted to new HW
Supporting Founder
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 25, 2003
20,762
14,546
Michiana
I can see a truck floating through space with a "Sanford and Son" logo on the side dragging a big magnet through outer space in my mind.
Unfortunately, most space junk is non-ferrous and wouldn't respond to your giant space magnet. Maybe a huge butterfly net?
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell

long_time_DNC

Politically Incorrect
Lifetime Supporter
Apr 24, 2004
13,972
2,736
Pacific Northwest, where it rains a lot...
It astounds me how many launches there are nearly every day to put something into space...20 sats went up a couple of days ago on an Indian rocket. How much of the rocket required to launch this stuff falls back to Earth. At the current rate, it's going to get extremely crowded in a very short period of time...one cascade effect like we saw in the movie Gravity and that'll pretty much close off space to us for quite a while...
 

Troch77

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 4, 2015
4,182
1,206
Southern PA
I'm wondering if this satellite will address the spot beam issue that prevents customers from getting Hopper 3s. I wonder if that had something to do with the change of plans from the 110?

Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and nelson61

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
8,273
7,953
Where it's Warm
I can see a truck floating through space with a "Sanford and Son" logo on the side dragging a big magnet through outer space in my mind.

It's real. One of the big space guys has plans for a space tug that would lasso space junk and shove it out of the geostationary orbit. I'll see if I can find the link.

Yes indeed Space Junk is a big deal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris
 
Last edited:

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
8,273
7,953
Where it's Warm
There was a new epoch mid day Thursday with the perigee at 33000+ km and near the test longitude.
Averaging about 1200 km below the geostationary altitude.
The tracking sites projections will now become more meaningful.
 

Troch77

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 4, 2015
4,182
1,206
Southern PA
It's real. One of the big space guys has plans for a space tug that would lasso space junk and shove it out of the geostationary orbit. I'll see if I can find the link.

Yes indeed Space Junk is a big deal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris
They are considering refueling them..
That's very interesting.
I wonder why they don't do that now?
I'll go lol.



Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
 

Dr Pepper

SatelliteGuys Family
Mar 7, 2010
67
17
Bowling Green KY
Looks like it's home for testing


NORAD ID:
41592
LOCAL TIME:
19:17:10
UTC:
00:17:10
LATITUDE:
-0.04
LONGITUDE:
-67.11
ALTITUDE [km]:
35738.32
ALTITUDE [mi]:
22206.76
SPEED [km/s]:
3.08
SPEED [mi/s]:
1.91
AZIMUTH: 151.4 SSE
ELEVATION:
+41.6
RIGHT ASCENSION:
14h 23m 46s
DECLINATION:
-06° 57' 22''
Local Sidereal Time:
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell

navychop

Member of the Month - July 2014!
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2005
60,011
27,279
Northern VA
I'm not sure standard refueling ports have been decided upon. I do seem to remember the idea being floated some years ago.
 

bobvick

Pub Member / Supporter
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2006
4,464
2,163
Northwest Alabama
Quick, Let me get my Superbuddy.

I don't have the 67 Orbital Location.


Just kidding , I'm Preparing for Allen when he freaks out and wonders why it's not at the 61.5.

But good to see everything so far so good.

Samsung Galaxy S6 Active

Are you from California? Just curious why you always refer to orbital slots as Californians do freeways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSheridan

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)