6/10/2010 7:27am - Uplink Activity Report - 13 changes

D

DigiDish Uplink Report

Guest
Original poster
SatelliteGuys.US DishNetwork Uplink Activity Report - 6/10/2010 7:27am - 13 changes

Uplink Comparison Range: 06/10/2010 12:04A - 06/10/2010 07:26A

Channel Additions:
4839 - TMP71 [MPEG2 SD] added to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4840 - TMP72 [MPEG2 SD] added to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)

Channel Moves:
4816 - TMP46 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4820 - TMP50 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4825 - TMP26 [MPEG4 SD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4826 - TMP56 [MPEG2 SD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4827 - TMP57 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4835 - TMP69 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4836 - TMP66 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4837 - TMP67 [MPEG4 HD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)
4838 - TMP68 [MPEG2 SD] moved from EchoStar6 61.5W TP 28 ConUS beam to EchoStar14 119W TP 03 Spotbeam B7 (NA)

Transponder Changes:
EchoStar14 119W TP 14 ConUS beam changed from 20000 QPSK 5/6 to 20000 QPSK 7/8
EchoStar14 119W TP 21 ConUS beam changed from 20000 QPSK 5/6 to 20000 QPSK 7/8

Channels in the system: 7352
(A) = Available to subscribers
(NA) = Not Available
(H) = Hidden from non-subscribers

The Format and Layout of the SatelliteGuys Uplink Report is © Copyright 2010 SatelliteGuys.US and may not be republished without written permission from SatelliteGuys.US.

The SatelliteGuys Uplink Report is powered by Digiblur Technologies! - DigiDish v10.06.01

© 2010 - All Rights Reserved - SatelliteGuys Incorporated
.
 
I hope they are planning to move Denver locals here. That would enable Colorado Springs DMA locals to shift from 129 TP2 Spotbeam 28 to Spotbeam 19 that Denver is currently using on 129 TP4. Spotbeam 28 is really less than optimal for Colorado Springs--and especially for those of us in that DMA northwest of the Springs. Spotbeam 28 is centered in northeast New Mexico.
 
It is quite possible that they may be adding the local Galavision and Telemundo affiliates in Denver. They already added the Univision affiliate last week. Of course, it is hoped that they would add the two Denver PBS HD feeds. We can only dream, can't we?

If I remember correctly Colorado Springs is sharing some of the spotbeam used for Denver and Cheyenne. By the way, those who live between Denver and Colorado Springs will probably get both cities, under most viewed station status. So, this change could be for that, instead of adding new HD channels.
 
It is quite possible that they may be adding the local Galavision and Telemundo affiliates in Denver. They already added the Univision affiliate last week. Of course, it is hoped that they would add the two Denver PBS HD feeds. We can only dream, can't we?

If I remember correctly Colorado Springs is sharing some of the spotbeam used for Denver and Cheyenne. By the way, those who live between Denver and Colorado Springs will probably get both cities, under most viewed station status. So, this change could be for that, instead of adding new HD channels.

SatelliteGuys.US - Subscription 129°W
 
Digi. Do you know or have a guess how much space is needed for one 3D channel? Will it be the same as an HD channel that is MPEG4?
Not that I think there will be a lot of these channels and I hate that the industry is "side tracked" at the moment.
 
Digi. Do you know or have a guess how much space is needed for one 3D channel? Will it be the same as an HD channel that is MPEG4?
Not that I think there will be a lot of these channels and I hate that the industry is "side tracked" at the moment.

Same amount of space...actually a little less since the encoder can compress the 3D images together since a lot of the images is alike except for the 3D accent in the frame.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)