9/2/2009 4:55pm - Uplink Activity Report - 29 changes

[db2]

I think there is one member who is really seeing red since he can no longer see or post to this uplink center forum.

: Alleluia :

 

[r424chevy48II]

:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:up

:up

 

[cosmo_kramer]

Finally!!

 

[Jim S.]

I didn't mind that much, most of the time. And his last request, to color-code the lines, seemed pretty good.

 

[RedSavina]

I think there is one member who is really seeing red since he can no longer see or post to this uplink center forum.

Harumph!

(ref: Blazing Saddles)

 

[megamike]

I didn't mind that much, most of the time. And his last request, to color-code the lines, seemed pretty good.

+1

 

[sethwell]

but they are already color coded (NA) pretty self explanatory, and if people would read the whole uplink including the legend, then they shouldn't need to ask questions or make remarks.

 

[Derwin0]

I didn't mind that much, most of the time. And his last request, to color-code the lines, seemed pretty good.

I have to agree, as he said, people ask all the time why they can't see such and such channel.
Perhaps since Available is spelled out at times, we should also spell out Not Available.

 

[--sexy-warlock--]

NA is enough. If it confuses, then tough.

 

[digiblur]

I have to agree, as he said, people ask all the time why they can't see such and such channel.
Perhaps since Available is spelled out at times, we should also spell out Not Available.

It is spelled out when a channel changes to unavailable. There's no room to spell it out when you have other things going on.

 

[Derwin0]

It is spelled out when a channel changes to unavailable. There's no room to spell it out when you have other things going on.

OK, that makes sense.