echostar 11 launch update from sea launch

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Considering that the Echostar FCC filing for E11 stated that they hoped for a launch as early as October, 2007, I'd say E11 was one, and AMC-14 (already planned for a December launch) was the other.

Why is it important that AMC-14 isn't owned by Dish? It was built for Dish, and it's being launched for Dish.
This is how I understood this.
 
It is NOT really important who owns the satellite, I was only pointing out a correction to the statement that DISH was launching a sat.

Only to get the record straight, but who owns it shouldn't matter to us - but it DOES matter to them. DISH doesn't seem to have any direct connection to the vehicle manufacturer or the contracted launcher.
 
As far as I know E11 was only a replacement for 110, which is not either of the two rumored coordinates for the mpeg4 service. Check the filling I posted.
 
It is NOT really important who owns the satellite, I was only pointing out a correction to the statement that DISH was launching a sat.

Only to get the record straight, but who owns it shouldn't matter to us - but it DOES matter to them. DISH doesn't seem to have any direct connection to the vehicle manufacturer or the contracted launcher.

Good point.


Only thing I ever found really on AMC14 was this:

AMC-14
 
It is NOT really important who owns the satellite, I was only pointing out a correction to the statement that DISH was launching a sat.

Only to get the record straight, but who owns it shouldn't matter to us - but it DOES matter to them. DISH doesn't seem to have any direct connection to the vehicle manufacturer or the contracted launcher.
I'm a little upset because I was informed there would be 2 Satellite launched by the end of 2007 FOR or BY E* I don't care if the milkman own's them or launches them.
 
Only to get the record straight, but who owns it shouldn't matter to us - but it DOES matter to them. DISH doesn't seem to have any direct connection to the vehicle manufacturer or the contracted launcher.

I can guarantee you that SES Americom wants to get it launched and working as quickly as possible though in order to open the "valve" on Charlie's wallet.
 
I think many will be irritated, but I wouldnt count it out just yet.

I know the team summit comment by Charlie was not supposed to be made, but it was stated again during the June 11th Charlie Chat.

Click Here
By December 2007
. 2 satellite launches
. First full MPEG-4 system
. Capacity
.HD local to l0cal 100 cities, 85% of country
. 200 HD channels
shows the HD Lineup of channels
32 national channels available
 
Again - and only to correct some info, AMC-14 is leased 100% by DISH, but it was NOT built for DISH. From SES' FCC filing:

SES AMERICOM will also have a Ku/Ka-band satellite at 105º which will provide two-way Internet and broadband services direct-to-home. Consumers will require only one satellite dish to receive both the direct-to-home video and broadband services. SES AMERICOM proposes to lease capacity on AMC-14 and the satellite to be located at 105º to various companies that own and/or distribute television programming and other content, including broadband Internet services provided by independent Internet Service providers. SES AMERICOM will not itself offer any retail or consumer services.
document in total is attached.
 

Attachments

  • SES.doc
    44 KB · Views: 109
Again - and only to correct some info, AMC-14 is leased 100% by DISH, but it was NOT built for DISH. From SES' FCC filing:
Business plans change. You probably noticed that this filing was from five years ago when Hughes Network Systems was still intending to use the Spaceway satellites for data.
 
other questions I have. Do DISH recievers have Ka receiving capability? AMC-14 is both a Ku/Ka-band satellite.

Has SES AMERICOM leased the two-way internet and broadband on this bird to a provider?
 
Another questions I have. Do DISH recievers have Ka receiving capability? AMC-14 is both a Ku/Ka-band satellite.

Has SES AMERICOM leased the two-way internet and broadband on this bird to a provider?

Look at the newer information in the link I posted in #24. Its KU, or thats at least all it says.
 
other questions I have. Do DISH recievers have Ka receiving capability? AMC-14 is both a Ku/Ka-band satellite.
...
It's not the receivers, it's the LNB. Anik-F3 at 118.7 is Ka-band, and requires a special circular polarity LNB. Dish uses that one for some HD LIL and internationals. It still works with the current receivers. Having said that, I don't think Dish plans to use the Ka-band on AMC-14 for anything, but I could be wrong.
 
Actually Anik-F3 is regular Ku band not Ka band or DBS Ku band. AMC-14 is DBS Ku band like all the Dish owned satellites except E-9 at 121 W which is regular Ku band but it does have Ka band capability. It has been announced via a SES Americom filing with the FCC that AMC-14 is not going to 105.5 W (an unapproved DBS tweener slot) but another unannouced location. SES Americom has filed a FCC application to launch AMC-20 to the 105.5 W DBS tweener slot. Dish also has use of the Ka band on AMC-15 at 105 W and AMC-16 at 85 W the two other satellites leased from SES Americom but Dish has only used the regular Ku band on these satellites. Obviously E-11 is DBS Ku band.
 
It's not the receivers, it's the LNB. Anik-F3 at 118.7 is Ka-band, and requires a special circular polarity LNB. Dish uses that one for some HD LIL and internationals. It still works with the current receivers. Having said that, I don't think Dish plans to use the Ka-band on AMC-14 for anything, but I could be wrong.

Um, not according to lyngsat. From what I can tell, it's just a FSS Ku bird with circular rather than linear polarity.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)