Date when Dish stops broadcasting SD stations/data? Mar 2023?

BarnRat

SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Aug 30, 2021
610
1,250
SW USA
I think I read on this forum that Dish was going to stop broadcasting SD stations/data and switching to all HD in Mar 2023. Is this still a valid date? Does anyone have more info on this? When I call Dish to get an answer they say every time that they "don't know for sure . . . but soon."
 
  • Like
Reactions: RonaldoAntena
Dish switched Eastern Arc to all MPEG 4 in 2016 but I have not heard a date when Dish will switch Western Arc to all MPEG 4. SD channels are MPEG2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If they do switch off the sd channels, will it mean they can use two satellites instead of three to receive all of Mpeg 4 programming like the eastern arc does? Then they can stop renting 129 satellite.
 
I believe there is considerable confusion going on here...obviously. Dish is not turning off ALL SD channels, they are eliminating SD duplicates by replacing all old MPEG2 receivers with MPEG4 receivers, thusly making the MPEG2 SD duplicates on WA unnecessary.

As was alluded to in an earlier post Dish switched EA to all MPEG4 in 2016 and thusly was able to eliminate SD duplicates there 7 years ago, my understanding is that that that is what they are doing with WA. Whether that means they no longer need the 129 satellite is up to them. The biggest headache is getting to all those old MPEG2 receivers out there and replacing them. I guess at some point they may just drop all the MPEG2 channels and wait for the stragglers to complain that their channel is gone and find them that way.

There are still plenty of MPEG4 SD channels on Dish, most local secondary channels are SD and some of these have no HD source.
 
Jim 5506 is correct. Dish would eliminate the SD duplicate channels when they eliminate MPEG 2. The advantage to having both HD and SD duplicates is that when Satellite 129 loses signal due to extreme weather the receiver automatically switches to the SD version on Satellite 110. The 110 signal is stronger than the 129 signal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: LQQK
Jim 5506 is correct. Dish would eliminate the SD duplicate channels when they eliminate MPEG 2. The advantage to having both HD and SD duplicates is that when Satellite 129 loses signal due to extreme weather the receiver automatically switches to the SD version on Satellite 110. The 110 signal is stronger than the 129 signal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But if they eliminate the duplicate, couldn't they put the HD signal on 110 and take advantage of the stronger signal?
 
Jim 5506 is correct. Dish would eliminate the SD duplicate channels when they eliminate MPEG 2. The advantage to having both HD and SD duplicates is that when Satellite 129 loses signal due to extreme weather the receiver automatically switches to the SD version on Satellite 110. The 110 signal is stronger than the 129 signal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is actually a disadvantage.
I hate when it switches to the SD version of the channel.

Sent from my iPhone with Chrome
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
... The biggest headache is getting to all those old MPEG2 receivers out there and replacing them. I guess at some point they may just drop all the MPEG2 channels and wait for the stragglers to complain that their channel is gone and find them that way.

There are still plenty of MPEG4 SD channels on Dish, most local secondary channels are SD and some of these have no HD source.
I think that Dish has contacted me because I have two very old MPEG2 receivers: DVR 625s. The e-mails and recorded phone msgs I've been getting confused me into thinking they are dropping all SD channels, which according to you guys, is not what is going to happen. I'm getting my roof antenna replaced and both of my DVR625s replaced with Wallys next month (January).

Thanks for the info. Interesting stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheKrell
Once again, Dish is working to eliminate SD duplicates, not SD channels that stand alone. Putting an SD channel on an HD channel would defeat their purpose of freeing up bandwidth. Actually, that is a misnomer, all that matters is how much bandwidth a particular channel must occupy in the downlink, SD/HD is irrelevant.
 
Top