So IF he buys DIRECTV he should let them go broke and then buy them again for pennies on the dollar?charlie buys dtv if he does?? i say let em go broke and buy everything for pennies on the dollar
So IF he buys DIRECTV he should let them go broke and then buy them again for pennies on the dollar?charlie buys dtv if he does?? i say let em go broke and buy everything for pennies on the dollar
I think the loses Bruce shows is that Dish will crash before Direct? The quarterly losses are staggeringly high.wonders how much longer before charlie buys dtv if he does?? i say let em go broke and buy everything for pennies on the dollar!!! there's been rumors flying around after the sale of spectrum there could be another merger... There's no way in hell ide want dtv to buy dish
. ide def bounce!!!
I think the loses Bruce shows is that Dish will crash before Direct? The quarterly losses are staggeringly high.
i heard dish has a surplus of 24 billion after the sale of spectrum.. how much cash does direct have since breaking up with attI think the loses Bruce shows is that Dish will crash before Direct? The quarterly losses are staggeringly high.
First the comment was waiting for Direct to go belly up and buy for pennies on the dollar. Why would any company buy a dying company while they are dieing faster? I see it as a lose lose, as it appears to be completely outdated service? What can Dish do different? Just because you have money, what can be different? They both have a streaming service, which is more profitable?i heard dish has a surplus of 24 billion after the sale of spectrum.. how much cash does direct have since breaking up with att![]()
who would invest in a failing company is beyond me. i think they should remain seperate people are gonna flock to other places. tv won't be the same in 5 years!!! though while there loosing subs there still making some profitSo IF he buys DIRECTV he should let them go broke and then buy them again for pennies on the dollar?
I assume both companies would like to have the others subscribers to stave off failing as long as possible.who would invest in a failing company is beyond me. i think they should remain seperate people are gonna flock to other places. tv won't be the same in 5 years!!! though while there loosing subs there still making some profit
i'm sure they would love to combine as oneI assume both companies would like to have the others subscribers to stave off failing as long as possible.
why not wait and see then buy em after they go brokeSo IF he buys DIRECTV he should let them go broke and then buy them again for pennies on the dollar?
While Dish has about 3 million less satellite subscribers, DirecTV loses more subscribers every year, about 1 million for Dish, 2 Million for DirecTV.I think the loses Bruce shows is that Dish will crash before Direct? The quarterly losses are staggeringly high.
The problem with a rebrand is they are going to waste a ton of money building market awareness.We set up phones "outside the hood" daily. The rate of new subs is accelerating, quarterly but even Dish internals agree there should have been a rebranding and not using the Boost name. I assume it was just cheaper than a completely new rollout and marketing of a new brand
I'm not much concerned about my TV, in the greater scheme. I have DiSH and a 722k and that's all I need from DiSHDon't care about spectrum stuff for multiple reasons. Even though straightforward interaction among gov't and industries is good (does not happen much and boring details not included here because this forum is about getting a view of entertainment regardless of how).
I would like a Hopper interface (the best which is very important) with multiple tuners that lets me access sats and streaming and antenna tv along with apps (some thin glike plus which I do not have) that I can use to get other stuff and DVR.