This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

HDMI Forum Announces Version 2.1 Of The HDMI Specification

gadgtfreek

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
May 29, 2006
22,105
865
Lower Alabama
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...n-21-of-the-hdmi-specification-300384117.html


 
Reactions: charlesrshell
Yep. if I get my wish this year, it will be a 2017 OLED that does DV and HDR10, Ill worry about 2.1, dynamic HDR, etc... in a few more years. I dropped a lot of money on my preamp that is 2.0a, wont be upgrading that for awhile.
 
Reactions: charlesrshell
They seem to be claiming more than a few things for which there is no underlying standards support. Kind of like saying Wheaties (or weed) supports Michael Phelps class swimming.
 
The bandwidth is now increased from 18Gbps to 48Gbps!
New cables will be needed to fully support it.
 
Yep. if I get my wish this year, it will be a 2017 OLED that does DV and HDR10, Ill worry about 2.1, dynamic HDR, etc... in a few more years. I dropped a lot of money on my preamp that is 2.0a, wont be upgrading that for awhile.

Did you see this?

The new specification will be available to all HDMI 2.0 Adopters and they will be notified when it is released early in Q2 2017.

Does that mean it will be firmware upgradable?
 
Supported resolutions and frame rates:
  • 4K50/60
  • 4K100/120
  • 5K50/60
  • 5K100/120
  • 8K50/60
  • 8K100/120
  • 10K50/60
  • 10K100/120
HDMI 2.1 Specification supports the latest color spaces including BT.2020 with 10, 12, and 16 bits per color component.

Q: Will 8K@60 or 4K@120 require a new cable or cable connector?

A: Yes a new cable is required
 
Not IMO, it means the HW guys will have the data how to build it into new HW and show you what you need to buy at the next CES.
 
That's how I read it too. I doubt it will be a firmware upgrade. The much higher bandwidth will likely require new chips.

That's what I think too but for the HDMI pass through, it may work. Obviously a TV or Projector and a player will need processing power to handle the new bandwidth. Two years ago at CES I saw the hardware for 8K 60 and it was big.

IMHO, this stuff is getting far ahead of the market. 3D 2K never really got off the ground. 4K is still trying to find it's market. Introducing a bigger carrot at the end of a long long stick may convince buyers of 4K to wait. Haven't we heard that excuse before?
 
IMHO, this stuff is getting far ahead of the market.
Perhaps not too far ahead. Next Avatar is supposed to be in 4K120. That's already beyond the HDMI 2.0 specs...
 
I still find it odd that UHD might actually make 3D more palatable, yet now is when they drop it.
 
I still find it odd that UHD might actually make 3D more palatable, yet now is when they drop it.

Sony solved the 4K 3D issue with it's Realty Creation upscaler that really looks great. There is no ghosting and the color is quite brilliant. 3D textures in the fabrics and other fine detailed textures can only be realized on a screen that is about 100" or greater. Unfortunately, HDR is not realized on these large screen projected images as they don't have the brightness range. HDR is better for the OLED screens. There is no perfect one system does all yet.
 
Yes, passive 3D on a 4K screen is literally twice as good, as measured by my own eyes.
 
Yeah good thing is that it's backward compatible and the newer cable should not be too much which will always depend on the lenght. That's another thing I like about my Samsung 4K TV the One Connect makes it where you don't always need real long cables.
 
New cables will be needed to fully support it.
Yet another key reason that HDMI needs to be put to rest. First they tell us that the old cables are good enough for HDMI 2.0 and then they come out less than a year later and tell us they won't be good enough for HDMI 2.1.
 
That's another thing I like about my Samsung 4K TV the One Connect makes it where you don't always need real long cables.
You can buy some pretty nice cabling (or maybe even go wireless) for the $400 cost of a OneConnect unit and its cable that gets more than a few gripes about how it isn't long enough and cannot be easily extended.