Navy contractor abusing dogs

Status
Please reply by conversation.
Van

Van

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Master
Jul 8, 2004
9,316
1
Virginia Beach
E-mails: Navy dogs in 'deplorable' conditions with contractor | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com

By Corinne Reilly
The Virginian-Pilot
© March 6, 2010

The task probably seemed innocuous enough when a small team of U.S. Navy personnel accepted it last fall. They would trek out to a private security contractor in Chicago to pick up 49 dogs, then transport them to a nearby military base.

But what they found when they arrived was shocking, according to internal Navy e-mails: dirty, weak animals so thin that their ribs and hip bones jutted out.

The dogs were supposed to have begun working months earlier to sniff out explosives at Navy installations across the country, including several in Hampton Roads. At least that was the plan when, for the first time, the Navy decided to hire an outside contractor to supply K-9s and handlers to help protect dozens of its bases and ships.

But when the dog-handler teams showed up for work last spring, they couldn't find planted explosives during military certification tests, according to the Navy. So the bases sent them back to the contractor, Securitas Security Services USA.

The Navy decided to cut its losses and ended the contract in July, eventually agreeing to buy the 49 Securitas dogs and train and handle them on its own. It sent its team to get the K-9s on Oct. 5.

The Navy declined to discuss what its personnel discovered that day, but according to e-mails obtained by The Virginian-Pilot, the animals appeared starved, neglected and dramatically different from three months earlier, when they failed the military's certification tests.

The e-mails say the Navy picked the dogs up at a warehouse. In one message, a civilian official described their condition as "deplorable." In another, he wrote that he feared the dogs would have died if the military hadn't come to get them.

In fact, the Navy said later, at least two of the dogs did not survive. Several others were deemed too sick to ever be of use. Nearly a year after they were supposed to have begun working, the remaining K-9s still are not patrolling Navy installations as intended.

Securitas disputes that the dogs were poorly trained and neglected. The company says it is owed more than $6 million for its services and for the animals. The Navy appears to have gained little from the deal besides the dogs, which Securitas bought for roughly $465,000, according to the owner of the kennel that sold them.
 
jayn_j

jayn_j

Press On Regardless
Supporting Founder
Sep 29, 2003
10,736
3,377
Sheboygan, WI
Others will probably comment on lack of oversight and on the jerks the owners of this company were, but this is what jumped out at me:

They would trek out to a private security contractor in Chicago to pick up 49 dogs, then transport them to a nearby military base.
...
The Navy appears to have gained little from the deal besides the dogs, which Securitas bought for roughly $465,000, according to the owner of the kennel that sold them.

OK, so what was so special about these dogs that the government paid nearly $10k apiece for UNTRAINED dogs? Do they poop golden nuggets?

I mean, you can generally buy AKC championship stock for under $1k.
 
Van

Van

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Master
Jul 8, 2004
9,316
1
Virginia Beach
Yea there are several issues here but I believe that price per dog is what the current cost for a trained bomb sniffing dog is.
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Similar threads

navy8ball
  • Locked
Replies
2
Views
1K
Bobby
Bobby
Van
  • Locked
Replies
5
Views
2K
SatelliteGAL
S
DirectDishNet
  • Locked
Replies
0
Views
1K
DirectDishNet
DirectDishNet
Derwin0
Replies
1
Views
1K
cardinalrooter
cardinalrooter
stardust3
Replies
0
Views
523
stardust3
stardust3

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top