ESPN sues Verizon over customizable FiOS TV plans

ronjohn

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 17, 2005
788
13
Cry baby ESPN anytime they never get their way..

Well, IF Verizon is violating the terms of their contract with ESPN, then ESPN is within their rights to sue. I don't agree with the way that Disney forces ESPN on everyone, but Verizon should be held accountable for their contract agreements.

I see this as the beginning of the death of ESPN. They rely on every single TV subscriber paying for ESPN to be able to pay the incredible fees for sports rights that they pay. I see it as a downward spiral. If people are allowed to NOT get ESPN, then ESPN will have to charge higher fees to those who want sports programming. As the fees go up, fewer people will keep ESPN. As fewer people subscribe to ESPN, the fees will have to go even higher. The sports bubble is going to burst, and this might be one of the beginning factors.
 

Scott Greczkowski

Welcome HOME!
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Cutting Edge
Sep 7, 2003
102,748
26,382
Newington, CT
As much as don't care for ESPN, I have to agree with ESPN here. The contract spells out how the channel can be packaged and what channels it has to be packaged with. Verizon is violating that contract.

Although one can only hope Verizon wins as that would change television as the way we know it.
 

Ronnie-

Member of the Year
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Aug 28, 2007
31,779
12,270
mississippi
As much as don't care for ESPN, I have to agree with ESPN here. The contract spells out how the channel can be packaged and what channels it has to be packaged with. Verizon is violating that contract.

Although one can only hope Verizon wins as that would change television as the way we know it.
It would also change contract law as we know it. I see no way that Verizon could win this.
They will have to negotiate it in the next round.
 

osu1991

SatelliteGuys Master
Sep 4, 2004
10,192
2,598
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Either one could be right, it's all just a guess as to whom is right, unless ESPN/Disney wants to make that contract public. Verizon obviously thinks there is something in the contract language that lets them offer the new lineup.
 

Don in CT

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Dec 4, 2013
11,838
15,874
Central CT
We need the other cable operators to follow suit. Once the dominos start to fall the sports networks will have no choice but to renegotiate at lower rates. The carriers need to grow a pair and not agree to these obscene fees.
 

Jimbo

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Cutting Edge
Jul 14, 2005
68,883
7,233
NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
We need the other cable operators to follow suit. Once the dominos start to fall the sports networks will have no choice but to renegotiate at lower rates. The carriers need to grow a pair and not agree to these obscene fees.
Problem with that is, all these contracts would expire at different times, so getting them to ban together would be difficult.
 

Don in CT

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Dec 4, 2013
11,838
15,874
Central CT
Problem with that is, all these contracts would expire at different times, so getting them to ban together would be difficult.
I saw somewhere that the Yes Network has a clause that if they lower the rate for one they have to redo all the other contracts. I wonder if ESPN has a similar clause.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)