Just wanted to echo earlier remark about the trouble of connecting to broadband internet:
I am fortunate the the 722 in the office is just a few feet from the internet connection and router. As for my other HD DVR's, they are not connected because of the pain in the a** it would be. AND DON'T even think about wireless as the limited bit rate would make downloading an eternal JOKE, especially HD!
If Dish is serious about DishONLINE and really want it to take off, they MUST, at the time of installation, provide all the hardware (routers, cables, etc.) for those current broadband subscribers to make it work for all TV's in the house because Joe Blow and Joe Sixpack (the same person?) won't even have a clue how to get it connected and certainly won't go to the trouble.
If Dish were a private company, they probably would provide whatever it takes (except the subscription to broadband where they don't have a partner) to get their HD DVR's connected to broadband and would have moved to an all MPEG4 service for the entire system. But Dish, like Direct TV and other companies, have to answer to Wall Street who have no patience for spending in the short term for profits in the long run. Wall Street is obsessed with satellite's cost of acquiring a customer and other expenditures, yet both companies are doing well financially (yes, even Dish's bad quarter doesn't even come close to going out of business) and could afford it. But they are a slave to the stock price, and that matters to Wall Street more than the profits! This is why several companies publicly discuss going private, to escape the tyranny of Wall Street. Dish has to provide all hardware that is needed to the customer if they ever want DishONLINE to even have a chance, and that goes for Direct TV, as well.