MM - thanks for the link into the FCC.
Sounds like their raw data is more to your liking than Antennaweb and TVfool.
Someone on
AVSforum seems to have a problem with Antennaweb and promotes 2150.com, instead.
Personally , I found 2150 arcane and useless.
To each his own.
When I want to look up hardware and see what's inside, I use the FCC ID number and get lots of added info.
In many cases, you cannot bookmark some of their info.
Not very user-friendly, but still the best game in town.
For me, I just want something to compare relative info from one TV station to another.
Or, to compare the Los Angles market to someone here on the forum, and predict an outcome.
So, for me, the
TVfool site seems to offer adequate info, and an easy user interface.
I can see that for more technical research, there may be better approaches.
As for digital TV either being there or not, let me take issue with that.
I've found a lot of exasperation in some of my digital TV tests.
The picture will be beautiful one minute, then frozen or pixel-smeared the next.
I have a straight shot to Mt Wilson where all LA TV comes from, and see serious variations in signal quality from one night to the next, and from one hour to the next on some nights.
That's 100% to under 20% at times, and other times a solid 100% for hours on end.
Having watched snowy analog TV as a kid, and seen it fade in and out, I find digital quality variation to be a close parallel.
Just all the more frustrating, because at times it'll be snow-free and gorgeous, leading you to think you've won, then the next second totally frozen or gone!