Social Feed

SabresRule
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
This is something I've been thinking about posting for a long time.

The designated hitter has led to a long-running debate about whether it's a good idea or not.

Here's my take: it's a good thing.

I admit, it's a bit personal. I used to be a DH when I played high school baseball. I know everyone says it's good to have everyone field, but not EVERYONE can field well. I couldn't play any positions at all- drop too many balls, sometimes get distracted easily- and can do one thing well- hit the ball well. (Also, if I stay in the dugout, I could fire up my teammates. Much better than losing balls in the sun)

Also, I have felt for years and years that pitchers don't hit well, but also, they can hurt themselves (Chien-Mien Wang and Jake Peavy last year, Randy Johnson will be out for 4-6 weeks because he hurt his shoulder swinging at a pitch.)

THE PEAVY FIASCO | Major League Baseball Blog - MajorLeagueBlogging.com

This is an article that sums up my opinions- it can be dangerous for pitchers, who can hurt themselves and damage their team's chances for the season.

(Bill, if the Red Sox need a big hit to score a run, who would you want at the plate- a proven clutch-hitter in Big Papi or a hurler hitting below the Mendoza Line that couldn't hit a ball hard enough to dent a pie's crust?)

People who rave about the double switch and strategy- well, you do not play to develop good strategies and pull off double switches because it makes a game better.

In the words of Herman Edwards, "You play to win the game!"

Finally- people like to call the National League "real baseball."

Well, since 1987, the league of "real baseball" has gone 3-18-1 in All-Star Games and 6-15 in the World Series. To me, "Real baseball" means real failur in games that count.

People hype up N.L. baseball as being pure and real, the best there is- like the Dallas Cowboys, San Jose Sharks (and the AFC in Super Bowls from 1985 to 1998), they usually fall flat in the games that matter the most.

That's my opinion.

What's yours?
39 Replies · 3506 views
BillD1984
I think that it's beyond assinine that, for the last 37 years, the two leagues have played under different rules. :rolleyes:

I personally don't care if there's a DH or not, just play by the same rules.
DodgerKing
I think that it's beyond assinine that, for the last 37 years, the two leagues have played under different rules. :rolleyes:

I personally don't care if there's a DH or not, just play by the same rules.
I actually like distinct rules.

In fact, I preferred it when the two leagues were even more distinct by never playing against each other in the regular season, using different umpire crews, using different set of rules for meetings at the mound, and having two distinct league presidents.

Baseball, unlike other sports, is made of 2 different leagues.
BillD1984
I actually like distinct rules.

In fact, I preferred it when the two leagues were even more distinct by never playing against each other in the regular season, using different umpire crews, using different set of rules for meetings at the mound, and having two distinct league presidents.

Baseball, unlike other sports, is made of 2 different leagues.


Okay fine, but whose set of rules do we use for the World Series?
DodgerKing
Okay fine, but whose set of rules do we use for the World Series?
The home team
BillD1984
The home team


That's EXACTLY what I don't like.

You play 162 games and up to 12 postseason games, then you get to the World Series and the rules change for one team!?? :confused:

Sorry, but IMO, that's ludicrous!
TNGTony
That's EXACTLY what I don't like.

You play 162 games and up to 12 postseason games, then you get to the World Series and the rules change for one team!?? :confused:

Sorry, but IMO, that's ludicrous!

The rules change for BOTH teams. Each team gets home games so there is no disadvantage.

I ask all you DH proponents again, why not have a designated hitting team and a defensive team? What is the difference between having a DH for a pitcher and having a DH for a great SS with a weak bat? Or a fabulous veteran catcher with no knees left to run the bases? Or an outfielder with a rocket arm and great skills and a propensity to strike out?

Or even more outlandish... a designated runner (DR) for slow players with good bats? This is a SERIOUS question. Why not? If one is a good thing, why not the others?

This is a serious question? If you are for a pitcher's DH, how can you be against a completely different offensive team and defensive team?

"I hate seeing pitchers hit"

I hate seeing bad hitters (sub .250) try to hit and being left in the game because they are great defensive players! (not really--but it's the same silly statement)
R
I am for the DH. I don't want to see pitchers injure themselves (i.e. Wang-Yankees) running bases. I want to see pitchers pitch without a rally-buster hitter (i.e. the pitcher) that couldn't hit the Mendoza line in his best season.

I know all the arguments against the DH. "Everybody plays everybody hits". But, by the exact same logic you can expose another arbitrary hypocrisy and turn it around and say that everybody bats, so everybody pitches. Every player should have 1 inning of pitching. It is the same "balance" issue to the game because pitching is far more difficult than hitting. Don't punish teams with good pitchers by making them be pulled from a game to get a potential "critical hit" in a 0-0 game. It rewards poor hitters and punishes good pitchers. How is that fair? Same could be said of rotating through all specialist positions from catcher to outfielder like they do in volleyball. It makes no sense.

But, I don't want to watch football and see a QB be forced to play linebacker and the seemingly "less professional" defense that would display. Every position in football has a specialist so we don't have to see a QB trying to be a LB. It optimizes the talent that people come to see.

If you are hung up on tradition, then consider the change of tradition of raising the pitchers mound. Could Babe Ruth as fat and non-muscular as he was, hit the 98 mph fast balls we see regularly today with the higher mounds? Ask any pitcher and they say the modern speeds come from higher mounds. Babe Ruth never had to hit against rocket balls like hitters do today.

Just my 2 cents.
Ramy
The rules change for BOTH teams. Each team gets home games so there is no disadvantage.

I ask all you DH proponents again, why not have a designated hitting team and a defensive team? What is the difference between having a DH for a pitcher and having a DH for a great SS with a weak bat? Or a fabulous veteran catcher with no knees left to run the bases? Or an outfielder with a rocket arm and great skills and a propensity to strike out?

Or even more outlandish... a designated runner (DR) for slow players with good bats? This is a SERIOUS question. Why not? If one is a good thing, why not the others?

This is a serious question? If you are for a pitcher's DH, how can you be against a completely different offensive team and defensive team?

"I hate seeing pitchers hit"

I hate seeing bad hitters (sub .250) try to hit and being left in the game because they are great defensive players! (not really--but it's the same silly statement)

Babe Ruth had a designated runner at one time.
jbernardi
I'm totally against the DH. It dumbs down baseball. It removes one of the classic managerial situations. (Do I remove a pitcher who's throwing well because we need a hit here?)
TNGTony
Babe Ruth had a designated runner at one time.

A designated "pinch runner" maybe. Sammy Byrd. Once Babe came out of the game, he wasn't allowed back in. AFAIK the rest is a myth.

A designated runner would have the ability to run the bases every time, even from home plate. (Pinch runner from home plate is currently only allowed if a player hits a home run and on the way to first is injured or incapacitated --eg Faints, breaks his ankle on a gopher hole on the way to first) then the hitter could come back up and hit for himself once his turn at bat came back up.

See ya
Tony
DodgerKing
Babe Ruth had a designated runner at one time.
Babe Ruth was actually a sleak footed fast outfielder as well. Most people see his big belly and think that guy was not very athletic. The dude could actually run pretty well.
Paul Wozniak
I am for the DH. I don't want to see pitchers injure themselves (i.e. Wang-Yankees) running bases. I want to see pitchers pitch without a rally-buster hitter (i.e. the pitcher) that couldn't hit the Mendoza line in his best season.

I know all the arguments against the DH. "Everybody plays everybody hits". But, by the exact same logic you can expose another arbitrary hypocrisy and turn it around and say that everybody bats, so everybody pitches. Every player should have 1 inning of pitching. It is the same "balance" issue to the game because pitching is far more difficult than hitting. Don't punish teams with good pitchers by making them be pulled from a game to get a potential "critical hit" in a 0-0 game. It rewards poor hitters and punishes good pitchers. How is that fair? Same could be said of rotating through all specialist positions from catcher to outfielder like they do in volleyball. It makes no sense.

But, I don't want to watch football and see a QB be forced to play linebacker and the seemingly "less professional" defense that would display. Every position in football has a specialist so we don't have to see a QB trying to be a LB. It optimizes the talent that people come to see.

If you are hung up on tradition, then consider the change of tradition of raising the pitchers mound. Could Babe Ruth as fat and non-muscular as he was, hit the 98 mph fast balls we see regularly today with the higher mounds? Ask any pitcher and they say the modern speeds come from higher mounds. Babe Ruth never had to hit against rocket balls like hitters do today.

Just my 2 cents.

The mound was actually lowered 6" in the late 60's, (I believe the timeline to be somewhere about then).
TheTimm
I like the DH exactly how it is. One league with it and one league without it. People who like it can watch the league with it, people who hate it can watch the league without it. Works for me.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68538 Replies · 2673585 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
EatMyVolts
A Little Bit of Soap -- The Jarmels
long_time_Dish
Give A Little Bit - Supertramp
dishstaller
Little Wing - Jimi Hendrix
long_time_Dish
With A Little Luck - Wings
H
LITTLE Willy-Sweet
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
116 Replies · 1836 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
Foxbat
I guess even the patience of us laid-back Hoosiers has its limits:
rvvaquero
I guess even the patience of us laid-back Hoosiers has its limits:
Be nice to see a Cowboy headline like that.
M
I guess even the patience of us laid-back Hoosiers has its limits:

Can we expect to see a new coach if we say "pretty please?"
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Jeeez, Week 6, no lead is safe…
Peter Parker
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
No idea what improvements might be involved.
24 Replies · 1072 views
  • Like
Reactions: LQQK and reubenray
N
I'm getting fabulous picture on Ch. 148 4k, but zero audio with H713. This is with a recorded show (Notre Dame game). Anyone else have this? Audio is fine on every other channel.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
jsmit86
I'm getting fabulous picture on Ch. 148 4k, but zero audio with H713. This is with a recorded show (Notre Dame game). Anyone else have this? Audio is fine on every other channel.
It's a known issue.
For a temporary fix, go into the menu, Audio, and turn Dolby Audio "OFF". You will have PCM stereo audio.

I was able to give the tech ops team some data logs so they could diagnose the problem, and they rolled me back to H708 temporarily. It fixed that issue.

They let me know that they understand what caused the issue, and it will be fixed within a few weeks in a new update.
long_time_Dish
They let me know that they understand what caused the issue, and it will be fixed within a few weeks in a new update.
Oh, you mean "soon"? :biggrin
Almighty1
It's a known issue.
For a temporary fix, go into the menu, Audio, and turn Dolby Audio "OFF". You will have PCM stereo audio.

I was able to give the tech ops team some data logs so they could diagnose the problem, and they rolled me back to H708 temporarily. It fixed that issue.

They let me know that they understand what caused the issue, and it will be fixed within a few weeks in a new update.
I guess they will be busy when lots of people start asking for rollbacks to H708 now that you mention that downgrades of software does exist because it will likely fix the OTA Single Tuner and the IR Remote problems in H710-H713.
navychop
it will likely fix the OTA Single Tuner

:popcorn
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
it will likely fix the OTA Single Tuner
🤣

Oh....you were serious
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
teachsac
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Hondo is back with a new squad 9/25 only on Starz.


View: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/b0gPzA8KHEQ
7 Replies · 105 views
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
K
Never watched the previous shows, so doubtful.
teachsac
Started watching yesterday. Not too bad.
Scott Greczkowski
Wife likes it.
  • Like
Reactions: teachsac
teachsac
I like Zyra from La Brea (one with the prosthetic).
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Stargate SG-1 cancelled, Atlantis renewed
clear.gif

Monday - August 21, 2006 | by Darren Sumner
clear.gif

The future of Stargate is in question today, as SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running Stargate SG-1, Multichannel News reported today and a GateWorld source has confirmed. The news regrettably follows the airing of the show's milestone two-hundredth episode on Friday.

Stargate Atlantis, meanwhile, has been renewed for a fourth season, with the network hoping to see that the spin-off series can stand alone, according to a source.
Source Gateworld
2033 Replies · 184143 views
R
I have gotten back into watching SG-1 and I have recorded most of the episodes to binge watch. What episodes are about the Antarctic or was this a movie? Also where could I watch the SG-1 movies?
osu1991
long_time_Dish
I have gotten back into watching SG-1 and I have recorded most of the episodes to binge watch. What episodes are about the Antarctic or was this a movie? Also where could I watch the SG-1 movies?
Well, there are a couple involving the Antarctic. "Solitudes", S1 E17 (one of my favorites), Then, "Lost City', S7 E21 and E22. Then, in the SGA pilot, "Rising", S1 E1 and E2, it starts out in the Antarctic for about the first 20 minutes or so.
R
Well, there are a couple involving the Antarctic. "Solitudes", S1 E17 (one of my favorites), Then, "Lost City', S7 E21 and E22. Then, in the SGA pilot, "Rising", S1 E1 and E2, it starts out in the Antarctic for about the first 20 minutes or so.
Which one has O'Neil being Ancients? I am at the end of Season 8 now.
long_time_Dish
Which one has O'Neil being Ancients? I am at the end of Season 8 now.
If I understand your question, O'Neill had the Ancient's knowledge in the "Lost City" two-part episode. That was when Anubis attacked Earth and there was a big battle over Antarctica.
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
152 Replies · 1935 views
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
Foxbat
Best fan sign I saw during the ND-BYU game: "Bear ate your Lucky Charms!" (Bear being the Cougars' QB). I was going to suggest, "Have you or your team been involved in a Carr crash?"
  • Haha
Reactions: Jimbo and Mike0616
M


They get cruel sometimes, very very cruel.😈. Hated to see my dawgs go down but I still say being ranked #1 is a hex on you!
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
Jimbo
They get cruel sometimes, very very cruel.😈. Hated to see my dawgs go down but I still say being ranked #1 is a hex on you!
Yup, I agree, I'd rather be 2 or 3 till the last few weeks.
  • Like
Reactions: Mike0616