Social Feed

P
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Hello, I am currently on a Comcast HD Preferred Triple Plan plan / promotion that ends in August 2010.

I pay about $140 for one HD TVR, one other regular/non-HD receiver, plus equipment rental fees and subscription to Fox Soccer channel. But I am very unhappy with Comcast's HD implementation and would love to switch to DishNetwork to enjoy offerings such as MSNBCHD, Afrotainment (part of the French international channel), FoxSoccerHD. [[ I will have to keep my subscription to Comcast High Speed internet and would drop the phone package unless bundling it would decrease my internet subscription]].

Which of the DishNetworks packages do you think will be suitable for me. I need:

-- One HD DVR (for my HDTV)
-- One regular/non-HD receiver for a bedroom (I don't have an HD TV there yet, but would by Xmas).

Are there any other options I should be aware of I consider the switch?

Cheers, Punda



I have
13 Replies · 2902 views
K
Wow, an msnbc viewer! There are only about 1,100 of you coast to coast. You are a rarity. Be forewarned, most of msnbc's "HD" content is SD with additional add ons top, bottom and side. Last night they did a story on two of the most pressing issues - Bush and Palin. sorry, could not help myself.

If you run 722 in dual mode the disadvantages are that the 722 loses PIP on the main monitor, a cable (RG6) will be run from the 722 to the other room and 2nd room will not have stereo audio.
P
KVnfl, thanks for your eye opening response. I have never seen how the MSNBCHD looks like, but I have seen the CNNHD -- is it what you are describing with the two big cnn bars on the sides, and ads on both top and bottom -- i don't mind so long as the picture quality is good -- I can't stand the SD quality now that i have been bitten by the HD bug ....:-)

I can understand the downsides of splitting the HD signal from the 722. So the real choices I have are:

-- Get 722K @ $6 (for the HDTV) and 211K @ $7 (for the SDTV), for a total of $13
-- Get 2 211Ks @ $14 (for both TVs), and get an additional hard drive to enable DVR for the main living room.

Does the downsides apply even if both TVs are HD, because I still plan to get one of the bedroom at the end of the year

thanks - Punda
R
KVnfl, thanks for your eye opening response. I have never seen how the MSNBCHD looks like, but I have seen the CNNHD -- is it what you are describing with the two big cnn bars on the sides, and ads on both top and bottom -- i don't mind so long as the picture quality is good -- I can't stand the SD quality now that i have been bitten by the HD bug ....:-)

I can understand the downsides of splitting the HD signal from the 722. So the real choices I have are:

-- Get 722K @ $6 (for the HDTV) and 211K @ $7 (for the SDTV), for a total of $13
-- Get 2 211Ks @ $14 (for both TVs), and get an additional hard drive to enable DVR for the main living room.

Does the downsides apply even if both TVs are HD, because I still plan to get one of the bedroom at the end of the year

thanks - Punda

Let correct it. a 722K Due receiver is $17 per additional reciver. A 211K is $7 per additional receiver. The 1st receiver on the account (which will be the most expensive one) is free & included in your account.

$6 is DVR charge per account which is applied to the account if the account have even 1 DVR receiver.

So if u go with a 722K & 211K setup then 722k ($17) is free & u pay additional receiver fee for 211K. Plus $6 DVR charge.

If u go for 2 211K in ur setup then 1 of it is free & u just pay $7 for additional receiver. No $6 charge for DVR since neither r DVR receiver (U need to pay Dish one time $40 to convert 211k into DVR plus u need to purchase ur own EHD).

Another setup option can be u can just take 722K & have the HD feed ur HD tv1 & have the tv2 setup from it also. This setup will only require u to pay $6 as DVR charge.
K
PundaSmith, comparisons to CNN HD are apt. Some shows, like Matthews are in HD. His set looks really, really cheap in HD. The add ons of other shows appear to be broadcast in HD even though the set is shot in SD. Overall, it is an improvement over the old SD broadcast.

As for 211 vs 722, I can not answer for the 211 plus EHD. The 722 is an excellent DVR. Its search functions need external influence, such as Entertainment Weekly to find programs to record. But once found, the 722 has a great interface for setting up recordings and manipulating saved recordings. The 722 can be networked via Cat 5/6, Wireless Access Point or HomePlug and programmed via Sling!!!

Personally, I use an old TiVo and a laptop to program the 722 and it works great.
P
Great ... thanks for the advice ... I think I will go for the 722K for now.

Hows the Fox Soccer Channel on DishNetwork -- is it really HD or SD programmed over HD -- as it currently is on my Comcast box?

thanks - Punda
Jonhern
Wow, an msnbc viewer! There are only about 1,100 of you coast to coast. You are a rarity. Be forewarned, most of msnbc's "HD" content is SD with additional add ons top, bottom and side. Last night they did a story on two of the most pressing issues - Bush and Palin. sorry, could not help myself.

If you run 722 in dual mode the disadvantages are that the 722 loses PIP on the main monitor, a cable (RG6) will be run from the 722 to the other room and 2nd room will not have stereo audio.

Most of the stuff during the day and prime time is HD on MSNBC, unlike CNN, of course not all the filed reports are in HD, but that is true of any newscast. Also the stuff late at night and the weekend is not, those documentaries that they show and predator series, but I remember reading new stuff will be in HD. I think it looked great when I had it, especially during the day with the white and blue color scheme. I think you are thinking of CNBCHD, which adds all those things on the side and bottom, which makes a lot of sense for them since its about the stock market. No longer get MSNBC in my package, only CNNHD, but I am fine not getting it as I had stopped watching it as much, plus I no longer have to support Fox News as well :).

FSC looks great, I think someone explained on here most stuff is not real hd since the countries they are coming from have different standards, but it gets upscaled. Either way it looks great.
P
Jonhern, thanks for your explanations.... cheers, PundaSmith
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 1 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 3 views
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Don't know if any of you have watched this series yet, it would be interesting to see if you feel this review was accurate. It was very humorous to listen to however.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsDO3y8I2c
2 Replies · 99 views
KAB
KAB
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
Y
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
If the review is like the article, oi! Eighteen paragraphs into the review and... all they've done is not really talk at all about the actual thing they are reviewing.

Halfway into the "written" review, I know more about how the writer "thinks" than I do about what they are writing about. I understand their politics, their self-overestimated understanding of film, their inability to be funny.

Takes about 22 paragraphs to get to one that starts "Anyway, the story kicks off...". Talk about Slop! 😂
K
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.
91 Replies · 3661 views
K
I'm sure I will watch at least the first episode but I am not optimistic.
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
Yeah, the foot stuff was just nasty. I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less. Funny, I love being shoe less at home and never wear shoes indoors in my home for long, but seeing her laying on all her furniture with her bare feet hanging out just kind of grossed me out.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
harshness
I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less.
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
MikeD-C05
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure. So walking around the station like she did she would get stuff on her feet. I am sure the robot vacuum is still going to miss stuff, with all those different alien species running around there.
harshness
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure.
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
MikeD-C05
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
osu1991
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
MikeD-C05
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
Jimbo
Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
  • Haha
Reactions: MikeD-C05
long_time_Dish
Well, look at the way she sat in the Captain's Chair. I didn't say the show should have been called "Captain Chair-Whore" for nothing...
  • Haha
Reactions: MikeD-C05
primestar31
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
star trek GIF by HULU


Just sayin...
MikeD-C05
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
For a whole generation of adults it was in the 1960s and 1970s.

All In The Family Nostalgia GIF by Sony Pictures Television
All In The Family Singing GIF by Sony Pictures Television
harshness
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
long_time_Dish
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68605 Replies · 2677807 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
sdfntx
Gondoliers, Shakespeares, Overseers, Playboys and Bums - Norman Greenbaum
Bobby
I Wish I Was Eighteen Again - George Burns
harshness
I Wish - Stevie Wonder
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
EatMyVolts
Lonesome Road -- The Wonder Who?
long_time_Dish
Lonesome Loser - Little River Band