Social Feed

C
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
People usually get excellent reception from 110W. Perhaps what, 80?

Assume 80. By how much would reception drop if I had to go through one branch of a pine tree? Not the pine tree itself, I'm to the left of that, but just one single branch with its needles. I see plenty of sky through the branch, I'd say I see half sky, half pine needles.

(For those that want more details:
That's the hypothetical. The actual story is that I barely have good LOS now but since pine trees grow about 1 foot per year, it will go from hypothetical to real in one year. This is for a wing dish. Therefore I could go with a 30-inch dedicated dish of some kind in prep for when the branch eventually obscures. )
12 Replies · 2335 views
KKlare
Remember the satellite is not perpendicular to the dish but is up by the amount the arm is down, say 15deg. So it is likely higher in the sky than you think.
-Ken
C
Remember the satellite is not perpendicular to the dish but is up by the amount the arm is down, say 15deg. So it is likely higher in the sky than you think.
-Ken

There's no dish installed. I'm just basing my would-be LOS to the satellite on the elevation given at dishpointer.com, which is about 37 degrees. I presume that I don't add another 15 or 20 degrees to that 37 and that it is just 37 that I am sighting for. Correct?
TheKrell
Correct.
jarvantgroup
Think of the footprint or area that your signal is beamed from the satellite to your dish as a circle. If there is nothing inside of that circle, then theoretically, you should have a full signal. As you begin to place things inside of that circle, i.e., leaves, pine needles, a branch, then that is that much less of a full signal that your dish is able to receive. 30% of your "circle" filled with pine needles, 30% lower signal strength. Aside from that, the tree is not going to stay still. Any wind is going to sway the tree and cause more issues with the signal.
KKlare
I think the 15 deg is in the scale on the dish. That said, set the scale from the receiver numbers and you should be within 3-5 deg of elevation. With skew set, sweep the azimuth for maximum. The jigger the elevation to improve. Finally adjust the skew slightly if the outside LNBs are not enough alike. Try to limit adjustments to two passes or just start over and recheck the plumb of the pole.
-Ken
G
the 110 elevation in nc is 39 with 119 at 33 if using a dish 500 skew it at 128 elevation 36 if you have the raise the elevation higher the 119 will be somewhat less.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 1 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 3 views
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Don't know if any of you have watched this series yet, it would be interesting to see if you feel this review was accurate. It was very humorous to listen to however.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsDO3y8I2c
2 Replies · 99 views
KAB
KAB
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
Y
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
If the review is like the article, oi! Eighteen paragraphs into the review and... all they've done is not really talk at all about the actual thing they are reviewing.

Halfway into the "written" review, I know more about how the writer "thinks" than I do about what they are writing about. I understand their politics, their self-overestimated understanding of film, their inability to be funny.

Takes about 22 paragraphs to get to one that starts "Anyway, the story kicks off...". Talk about Slop! 😂
K
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.
91 Replies · 3661 views
K
I'm sure I will watch at least the first episode but I am not optimistic.
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
Yeah, the foot stuff was just nasty. I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less. Funny, I love being shoe less at home and never wear shoes indoors in my home for long, but seeing her laying on all her furniture with her bare feet hanging out just kind of grossed me out.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
harshness
I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less.
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
MikeD-C05
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure. So walking around the station like she did she would get stuff on her feet. I am sure the robot vacuum is still going to miss stuff, with all those different alien species running around there.
harshness
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure.
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
MikeD-C05
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
osu1991
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
MikeD-C05
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
Jimbo
Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
  • Haha
Reactions: MikeD-C05
long_time_Dish
Well, look at the way she sat in the Captain's Chair. I didn't say the show should have been called "Captain Chair-Whore" for nothing...
  • Haha
Reactions: MikeD-C05
primestar31
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
star trek GIF by HULU


Just sayin...
MikeD-C05
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
For a whole generation of adults it was in the 1960s and 1970s.

All In The Family Nostalgia GIF by Sony Pictures Television
All In The Family Singing GIF by Sony Pictures Television
harshness
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
long_time_Dish
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68605 Replies · 2677807 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
sdfntx
Gondoliers, Shakespeares, Overseers, Playboys and Bums - Norman Greenbaum
Bobby
I Wish I Was Eighteen Again - George Burns
harshness
I Wish - Stevie Wonder
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
EatMyVolts
Lonesome Road -- The Wonder Who?
long_time_Dish
Lonesome Loser - Little River Band