Social Feed

M
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I am not sure if anyone has pitched this idea but here goes, Why not make a receiver that is HD but has multiple outs in OTA format, so the idea is the receiver has 4 tuners inside and outputs to 4 tvs via this one box, now the problem how do we send an HD signal to the TV's ? Well of course we cannot use HDMI way to long of a cable run for most homes, the idea that I am thinking of is, most newer HDTV's have a built in HD OTA tuners built in! Why not utilize them by have the receiver output a HD OTA signal for each of the 4 tuners so just like you tune to channel 60 or 73 for Tuner 2 on the 622,722,722K, ect..... the idea would be you tune to a OTA ATSC HD channel ? And the best part is of course no receiver to have to hide if you have a wall mounted tv, just put this box into your main cable junctions, i.e maybe near a electrical panel or furnace room or maybe even in one of the rooms your tv is. as for the remotes they will be most likely UHF or 2G just like on the 922 and of course all will be on different channels to accomidate the TV's

What do you think guys? Is this a good idea or am I just way off the charts here?
14 Replies · 3764 views
D
To the OP: TheKrell hit it on the head. Dish did (some years ago) in fact have a prototype (or at least definitely plans on paper--I think they built a prototype) of just what was suggested: a "Whole Home DVR" that was centralized and everything was to be re-modulated in ATSC, so all one would have to do is tune to one ASTC channel to view all the content and a different ATSC channel for the 2nd room and so on. The content owners did NOT like their stuff being re-transmitted UNENCRYPTED. In fact, DirecTV had to drop a really good wireless "Whole Home" system because they had problems ensuring encryption.

Don't feel bad. It is a really good idea. Engineers are pretty smart and it isn't that no one has thought of a solution, it is just that content owners have shot down and still shoot down some great innovations. It is what they live to do.

The good news is we have the forthcoming XiP 813 that will do pretty much the same functionality and content owners don't have a problem with it. Technically, it sounds GREAT. My only concern would be cost. We would need maybe 3 of those boxes and I hope the fees aren't so high that it becomes impossible for this sub.

Keep thinking of the good ideas, and be prepared for a "already thought of, but content owners said, "NO, no, no!"
M
To the OP: TheKrell hit it on the head. Dish did (some years ago) in fact have a prototype (or at least definitely plans on paper--I think they built a prototype) of just what was suggested: a "Whole Home DVR" that was centralized and everything was to be re-modulated in ATSC, so all one would have to do is tune to one ASTC channel to view all the content and a different ATSC channel for the 2nd room and so on. The content owners did NOT like their stuff being re-transmitted UNENCRYPTED. In fact, DirecTV had to drop a really good wireless "Whole Home" system because they had problems ensuring encryption.

Don't feel bad. It is a really good idea. Engineers are pretty smart and it isn't that no one has thought of a solution, it is just that content owners have shot down and still shoot down some great innovations. It is what they live to do.

The good news is we have the forthcoming XiP 813 that will do pretty much the same functionality and content owners don't have a problem with it. Technically, it sounds GREAT. My only concern would be cost. We would need maybe 3 of those boxes and I hope the fees aren't so high that it becomes impossible for this sub.

Keep thinking of the good ideas, and be prepared for a "already thought of, but content owners said, "NO, no, no!"

This idea has been sitting on the back burner of my head for awhile, just thought I would finally post, and another good point about how the modulators for ATSC are expensive, another reason the idea kept coming to my mind the fact that the TV2 feed for all the 622/722/722K ect, didn't have a second HD feed for TV2 hence why I thought why not just do it for multiple tuners,

all say this though lets here it for the future because maybe something similar will pop out of the industry!!
KKlare
Is it that general-purpose ATSC are expensive or can one make a single-purpose one (single frame size and rate) for a lot less?
-Ken
digiblur
This idea has been sitting on the back burner of my head for awhile, just thought I would finally post, and another good point about how the modulators for ATSC are expensive, another reason the idea kept coming to my mind the fact that the TV2 feed for all the 622/722/722K ect, didn't have a second HD feed for TV2 hence why I thought why not just do it for multiple tuners,

all say this though lets here it for the future because maybe something similar will pop out of the industry!!

Something like this will never popup in the future. The content providers will not allow it. You'll have to have encrypted video transmitted to do something like this, which is exactly what XIP receivers will accomplish.
B
Is it that general-purpose ATSC are expensive or can one make a single-purpose one (single frame size and rate) for a lot less?
-Ken

You've really got two (technical) issues. Let's say you want to distribute a satellite channel, which is MPEG4. Since the ATSC standard only uses MPEG2, you have to first decode the MPEG4 and recode in MPEG2 in something close to real-time. Then, you need to modulate the bitstream in ATSC. Could this be made affordable in quantity? Probably, but, as noted above, there is no (mass) market for it because of the lack of DRM (digital rights management) capability. If we can ever get over that hurdle, this scheme might be affordable, but there are other ways to do this over coax (e.g. XIP series) now, so we'll probably never see ATSC outputs.
M
This idea has been sitting on the back burner of my head for awhile, just thought I would finally post, and another good point about how the modulators for ATSC are expensive, another reason the idea kept coming to my mind the fact that the TV2 feed for all the 622/722/722K ect, didn't have a second HD feed for TV2 hence why I thought why not just do it for multiple tuners,

all say this though lets here it for the future because maybe something similar will pop out of the industry!!

I think a general purpose one is more expensive then a single purpose only because then only certain frequencies are used to deliver the channels, again I could be wrong
harshness
I think a general purpose one is more expensive then a single purpose only because then only certain frequencies are used to deliver the channels, again I could be wrong
Agile modulators aren't all that much more expensive than fixed frequency modulators in the grand scheme.

The MPEG2 conversion and ATSC multiplexing are the hard parts.
D
I think that Dish's cost while not necessarily cheap, would have been far less than many think for the ATSC modulators as Dish would have a critical mass that interested companies would exploit to bring the price per down significantly so that it would make economic sense for Dish. In other words, Dish would not have paid anywhere near what you or I would at retail.

I don't know how much Dish is paying for all the internal HDD's in its DVR's, but I am certain that while it is relativity expensive, Dish is NOT paying anywhere near retail and probably far, far, less than even one finds on Amazon because of Dish's (and other DVR makers) critical mass that the major HDD makers exploit that brings it much closer to the cost to manufacture to get the business.

This is a total speculation on my part, but I wouldn't be surprised if Dish pays close to $20 or so for each 1TB (maybe less) HDD simply because Dish needs hundreds of thousands, if not MILLIONS of them, and for that they can get a darn good price with that kind of critical mass and a lot business for the HDD maker with that huge economy of scale.
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
127 Replies · 2294 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
rvvaquero
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Y
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
  • Like
Reactions: b4pjoe
b4pjoe
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.
rvvaquero
Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.
  • Like
Reactions: b4pjoe and Mike0616
meStevo
Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.
K
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.
92 Replies · 3676 views
K
I'm sure I will watch at least the first episode but I am not optimistic.
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
Yeah, the foot stuff was just nasty. I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less. Funny, I love being shoe less at home and never wear shoes indoors in my home for long, but seeing her laying on all her furniture with her bare feet hanging out just kind of grossed me out.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
harshness
I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less.
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
MikeD-C05
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure. So walking around the station like she did she would get stuff on her feet. I am sure the robot vacuum is still going to miss stuff, with all those different alien species running around there.
harshness
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure.
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
MikeD-C05
Where is it going to come from -- specifically?

Why do you think cleaning technology won't improve in the next few hundred years? HEPA filtration was invented as part of the Manhattan Project.
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
osu1991
I don't know, but I still don't like her walking through the station or the academy with out her shoes. It looks unprofessional and very "hippy like" for someone of her status and I personally don't get off to feet, so there is that. ;)
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
MikeD-C05
Stay out of my office. I rarely have shoes or socks on in the office. My office and business is at home though :clapping
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
Jimbo
Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
  • Haha
Reactions: MikeD-C05
primestar31
Say, I don't wear socks or shoes in my house either. But for a captain in Star Fleet it looks bad to be walking around the academy with no shoes. Gives off 1960 Hippie vibes.
star trek GIF by HULU


Just sayin...
MikeD-C05
You say that like it's a Bad thing or something ... :biggrin
For a whole generation of adults it was in the 1960s and 1970s.

All In The Family Nostalgia GIF by Sony Pictures Television
All In The Family Singing GIF by Sony Pictures Television
harshness
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
long_time_Dish
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Jimbo
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Me either ...
They turned out to be a Poor adversary ....
TheForce
Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Phone & Tablet Zone
Apple Fall Hardware Event takes place today, September 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:00 p.m. ET. It marks the debut of new CEO John Ternus and the expected reveal of Apple's first foldable phone.
130 Replies · 1427 views
comfortably_numb
Can't remember if I've posted this yet..


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU
Foxbat
If you ponied up for an iPhone Duo, keep it away from anything other than your soft, fleshy fingertips. No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter. And don't bend it more than it needs to. Zack has destroyed $2,000 of Apple hardware to get those views, which should cover his expenses.
​
  • Like
Reactions: comfortably_numb
comfortably_numb
No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter

And definitely no medieval chain armor!
  • Haha
Reactions: Foxbat
harshness
medieval chain armor
Aka "mail" or "maille".
Foxbat
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.
​

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 4 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 7 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 1 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Don't know if any of you have watched this series yet, it would be interesting to see if you feel this review was accurate. It was very humorous to listen to however.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsDO3y8I2c
2 Replies · 109 views
KAB
KAB
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
Y
What a "pile of slop" review! I liked the show.
If the review is like the article, oi! Eighteen paragraphs into the review and... all they've done is not really talk at all about the actual thing they are reviewing.

Halfway into the "written" review, I know more about how the writer "thinks" than I do about what they are writing about. I understand their politics, their self-overestimated understanding of film, their inability to be funny.

Takes about 22 paragraphs to get to one that starts "Anyway, the story kicks off...". Talk about Slop! 😂