I remember as a JO in the Navy, trying to get my guys to control their tempers. They did not accept that it was their responsibility. Blamed the other person for angering them. Couldn't see that they were just giving that other person power over them. Not an exact analogy here, but there's something in there.
I see what you're saying here. And it's a good point to some degree. Getting angry a lot can lessen the quality of life for the person who's getting angry, and sometimes even cause more trouble for him or her. So, I try to let the little things go when I can (I'm Irish, though, so it isn't always easy).
There's a flip side to that equation, though, which is one takes shrugging things off to too much of an extreme, the repressed feelings can cause pain, too, and sometimes it encourages whatever unwanted behavior is the problem. Like, take the situation with the neighbors mentioned in post 72, things started getting that bad because I was letting stuff go for a long time, being very polite and friendly to them, ignoring the loud parties they threw that kept me up at night and the trash in my yard that my dog was eating and could have made him sick, trying to go along to get along, and despite that, they gradually just kept upping things until they were destroying my home intentionally to get back at the landlord. That's the way a lot of bullies work. You give an inch, they take a mile. You start fighting back, they back down.
One of my big regrets in life was being bullied as a child. Eventually, when this stuff was going on daily with the same kids, instead of waiting till they had something planned and vastly outnumbered me and threw the first punch, I should have found the regulars, isolated them, and bashed a few heads into lockers the next day. I think they would have respected that and backed off. Instead I made myself a victim by refusing to fight back, and went through years of hell that could have been avoided and will never completely be emotionally be resolved for me (Because, obviously, they are now adults, and I would never confront someone about stuff they did when they were young and immature- they aren't the same people anymore). But I really should have done something at the time.
So, yeah, I see your point. Someone does something little to me occasionally, I try to let those things go. Getting angry and holding onto it over small stuff doesn't do me any good, and also may not be entirely fair to the people doing the stuff, who may just have been having a bad day or whatever. But when people go balls to the wall after you, at some point, anger can be justifiable, and you have to fight back, because to do anything else would be cowardly and set yourself up for more victimization. I mean, there is a line that gets crossed at some point.
Okay, enough about the neighbors and back to television. You're right, anything that happens with TV is the small stuff. Not worth getting angry over. And I'm not really truly angry over it, beyond the little hints of anger it takes to type up a post or two about something. Actually, I like Dish. I want to be able to continue as their customer. But I don't need the extra aggravation of unwanted phone calls and stuff long-term. If I can't find a way around that that I'm happy with, long-term, I'll switch providers when my contract is up. Which, you know, is fine with me in the grand scheme of things. Whatever. But I think talking about it here at least lets them know some customers aren't happy with it. So, when they look at their financial reports and wonder about customer churn, they won't have to be puzzled, they'll know that some of it is from customers who are unhappy about the harassing phone calls and on-screen notices over bills that aren't overdue.
My thought is that with big companies, if you're unhappy and may switch, it's good to just in a friendly way tell them why. If enough people tell them about it, maybe they will change how they do things to something people dislike less. Or, if nothing else, maybe someone like me who would have an issue with this and is looking into Dish will see this thread today and decide not to subscribe, so I've done that person a favor and saved him or her some aggravation.
I think if I had done more research or heard about some of this stuff with Dish in advance, I would have called Directv first instead and seen what they could offer me. At the time, I had no Internet and could only look things up on the library wifi or whatever, though, so I couldn't scout out too much stuff. Hopefully, I'm helping the next person find the tv experience most suitable for him or her, though.
Like if Dish would either change their policy, or if I help prevent someone from picking Dish if they'll be unhappy with it, than it'll have been worth posting the thread.