Even if he would do this, it would serve no purpose. Rick has not invested a single penny in firmware development for the North American market and is hoping that the third party European firmware developers will fix all the bugs which are specific to this market. However, this is almost impossible to do as they can't receive our satellites and over in the European market, they are more focused on using these receivers for viewing subscription services either with a subscribed smart card or via illegal Internet sharing.
If it wasn't for us, the AzBox Me that he used to sell would have no ability to support such things as:
- Blindscan on systems using anything other than an universal LNBF (i.e. C-band or standard 10750)
- Manual PID entry
- Wireless networking support via USB adapter
- Default video settings to NTSC after a factory reset
- Default North American satellite list
Furthermore, it is a known fact that along with the European firmware, he was also pre-installing our firmware as well on the AzBox Me receivers he was selling. I'm 100% certain that if it wasn't for our firmware, he would have not sold out of his AzBox Me's yet at this time so the guy should be grateful for our investment in AzBox software development for the North American market. Sadly, it appears that he does not care at all for the long term quality of AzBox products in the North American market but rather just for his sales.
Best regards,
PwrSurge
AzBox Canada & US
I hope you didnt invest much, if thats all the changes youve done then what youve accomplished is trivial. You could have just used OpenPLi and got the same things, open source does wonders.
If you goto apple.ca you expect its apple, if you goto dell.ca you expect its dell, if you goto azbox.ca youd be mistaken in thinking is azbox's website, its only a dealer, not azbox themselves. You may not have ever stated that you were azbox, but youve implied it many times in how you refer to your company. Your mearly a dealer that has modified some trivial things in the firmware. None of what you listed is rocket science.
Your empty hopes about 4:2:2 is misleading as well. either the hardware supports it or it doesnt, no amount of hope can change whats inside the box. Have you seen the hardware yourself ? no ? you really shouldnt be filling consumers heads with unfounded hope about something you know nothing about. That's plain irresponsible.
Stop complaining about how much money youve sunk into a now defunct product and how no one else is paying anything to develop it when that was a personal decision only you should bear. It was your decision not anyone else's. Ive spent my own money to buy hardware just to develop drivers and software for devices, you dont see me complaining that I had to buy a $150 logic analyser just so that I could reverse engineer some closed source drivers do you? Did I have todo that? no. Its my own personal decision. Or what about the fact Prof tuners promised a blindscan driver/software for Linux for over a year, I gave up waiting and with the help of some others wrote an application and tweaked the drivers to support blindscan, spectrum scan, and iq plot. Something Windows had had for awhile and us Linux users didnt.
Im so sick of listing to you whine about how you spent all this money and no one else did and no one seems to appreciate you. Suck it up buttercup. Just because you made some bad financial decisions doesnt mean the entire world wants to hear about your personal problems on a public forum. Start supporting the FTA community or get out of the business.
UDL
Mods: delete this if you want, I understand Im a little testy and if you think Im overly brash I'll account it up to the fact Im Infantry and wont be offended