Social Feed

J
Last reply · posted in Cable Television and Fiber Providers
I fail to see why everybody wants MPEG4 to come so badly. Sure it will allow the addition of a few more channels, but it's not gonna make the picture look any better. Am I missing something? :confused:
11 Replies · 2858 views
Frank Jr.
From what I have read no one outside of DishNetwork knows when that will be implemented. I don't think DishNetwork even has an exact date or their not telling. Swapping out everyones receivers will be costly. Costly for whom? Don't think that DishNetwork will pay for it. No matter what product or service it is when there is a cost increase the consumer ALWAYS pays for it. It does however pay for the consumer to be informed. All these current receivers will at some point be door stops. Think about the receiver you are currently thinking about buying from some retailer or even directly from your dbs provider or even the ones you currently own. They all know that one day in the future it will be useless. It seems as though what the dbs industry wants is for everyone to lease the equipment not own it.
B
ByrdWatcher said:
From what I have read no one outside of DishNetwork knows when that will be implemented. I don't think DishNetwork even has an exact date or their not telling. Swapping out everyones receivers will be costly. Costly for whom? Don't think that DishNetwork will pay for it. No matter what product or service it is when there is a cost increase the consumer ALWAYS pays for it. It does however pay for the consumer to be informed. All these current receivers will at some point be door stops. Think about the receiver you are currently thinking about buying from some retailer or even directly from your dbs provider or even the ones you currently own. They all know that one day in the future it will be useless. It seems as though what the dbs industry wants is for everyone to lease the equipment not own it.

Yep. Undoubtedly, they will jack up the monthly programming rates to pay for the cost of this changeover. DirecTv will do the same, and you may have to pay $75-80/month for the most basic package! At some point, you will have to decide if it's time to stop feeding the (dbs) pig.
BobMurdoch
BabaLouie said:
Yep. Undoubtedly, they will jack up the monthly programming rates to pay for the cost of this changeover. DirecTv will do the same, and you may have to pay $75-80/month for the most basic package! At some point, you will have to decide if it's time to stop feeding the (dbs) pig.

They'll STILL be cheaper than Cable which is jacking up prices twice a year lately.
slacker9876
joemama said:
I fail to see why everybody wants MPEG4 to come so badly. Sure it will allow the addition of a few more channels, but it's not gonna make the picture look any better. Am I missing something?

They CAN improve the PQ if they lower the compression ratios on the actual signal. PQ is a matter of bytes ... let's pretend for one second they are pixels, even though they are not. Satellite providers like D* & E* will benefit because the more efficient compression scheme of MPEG4 would allow them to double the content overnight. Since we know they would not do this they will bump of things like HD and hopefully back off on the signal encoding. Meaning a pixel is a pixel: if currently they are sending 1024 pixels from a transponder but it is compressed to the point that only 720 of the pixels are effectively displayed they should easily have the room to display the entire 1024 under MPEG4 ... which subsequently could provide for 2048 pixels in the same amount of bandwidth.

Wow, even I am confused now ... but the point is that MPEG4 could make the picture better, but that does not mean that is what they will do with the increased bandwidth.
J
My initial question was somewhat loaded. I know how MPEG2 works, and I know some of the advantages that MPEG4 can bring. I was trying to guage what the average poster here knows. From most of the posts I've read, it seems a majority of the people here think once the MPEG4 switch is thrown the amount of channels will double and the picture quality will increase. Over time this may happen, but in a side by side test, the average Joe won't even know the difference.
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

12 Replies · 656 views
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
dishstaller
Losing 144,000 internet customers surprises me more.
ncted
Comcast called fiber pricing "irrational" because the ROI is over three years. What is irrational to me is Comcast internet is based on lines they put in the ground decades ago at this point, for the most part. Is copper that much more expensive to maintain?
B
Comcast called fiber pricing "irrational" because the ROI is over three years. What is irrational to me is Comcast internet is based on lines they put in the ground decades ago at this point, for the most part. Is copper that much more expensive to maintain?
yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration
(((Garyd)))
yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration
The fiber coming in to the house looks like 300 ohm old TV wire I think that is the weak point.
Jimbo
The fiber coming in to the house looks like 300 ohm old TV wire I think that is the weak point.
The weak point would be the connection between the outdoor feed and the indoor feed.
Jimbo
yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration
Copper lines are fine ... until it hits the AIR.
Bruce
Losing 144,000 internet customers surprises me more.
They have been losing broadband subscribers for about 4 years now.

IMG_2176.webp
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
B
The fiber coming in to the house looks like 300 ohm old TV wire I think that is the weak point.
I agree, even it fails the isp will come and install another one
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
Bruce
Charter lost 77,000 TV subscribers, the bigger news, it lost 233,000 broadband subscribers.

You would believe both companies would of learned from what happened with their TV services, which was ignore that cord cutting was a thing, allowed competition ( streaming) to get a foothold in the industry.

Now, in today's world, there are more households in the United States without a paid live TV than those with.

Both companies charge too much, delayed upgrades, all because they believed no one would leave them, only game in town, competition started with the 5G services, than Fiber, enough said, Cord Cutting 2.0 is here.

Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68758 Replies · 2685363 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
Too Much Time on My Hands - Styx
sdfntx
Time Has Come Today - The Chambers Brothers
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
long_time_Dish
No Time - The Guess Who
H
TIME Won't Let Me-The Outsiders
  • Like
Reactions: ClarkGable
ClarkGable
Time In A Bottle - Jim Croce
ewindowman
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th
453 Replies · 15628 views
nelson61
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Scott Greczkowski
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Can't remember where or who I saw predict this. :D

It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Bruce
It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
Scott Greczkowski
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Bruce
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.
Bruce
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
If Musk really wants to buy Boost, he might get a great price once Dish Wireless is out of Chapter 11.

Boost just lost 182,000 subs in the 3rd quarter-

M
Is Dish like Iran in one way...they both will totally collapse by end of week :)
Foxbat
Other than the price, my experience with Boost is not that different than what I experienced with my years with Cricket. I will be curious to see what happens if SpaceX takes the reins.
S
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.
dish has new sats dtv does not
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
R
dish has new sats dtv does not
Hate to say this no one is ordering Satellite TV. Both DISH and Direct no new customers.
After 25 years with centurylink DSL 80 speed i changed to Xfinity 300 speed for $50 wow lightning fast for streaming. Still have DISH 27 years with them. Americas 250 package for $103. What you think of superbox or vseebox for streaming is it legal?
Still dish is easy to operate and change channels. What will Charlie Ergen do with new super satellites with loosing customers with satellites and boost?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 17 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 17 views
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
7 Replies · 213 views
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
dfergie
I loved it when Rodney was on the Tonight Show...
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
Foxbat
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
Thanks, I wasn't sure if you had the wrong Subject or the wrong YouTube link.
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
osu1991
Was a Don Rickles fan. I've dvr'd most of his appearances on Carson from the antenna tv replays.

  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
dishstaller
More Dangerfield rapid fire on Carson.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scEQFHQHHhU
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
dishdude
Rodney Dangerfield is great. One of his best one liners - "My wife likes to talk to me during sex, last night she called me from Florida!"

Jackie Gleason is another one of the greats.


View: https://youtu.be/ciUV77AzIB4