Social Feed

styxfix
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I have a DP QUAD LNB hooked up to a DPP44 Switch. I have a (2) 508 DVR receivers and a 921 DVR receiver. One 508 and the 921 are hook up through the DPP44 Switch and the other 508 is hooked directly to the DP QUAD LNB. The 508 connected to the QUAD directly is working fine. All the other receivers won't pick up the 119 sat.

Everything was working fine until this morning, blank screen on some channels. I went to my point dish screen and noticed I lost the signal on my 119 sat on all my EVEN transponders. I do have a strong signal on most of my ODD transponders, but not all of them. When I do a switch test I can see the other sat locations but the 119 sat does not show up. I went into the DETAILS on my switch test on my 508 and it said that Port 1 on the QUAD was not showing up. I had Port 1 of the QUAD LNB going to Sat input 1 DPP44 so I changed that wire (all RG6) going to the sat input one and connected it to Port 4 of the QUAD LNB.

All of my 119 channels are now gone on the TWO receivers that use the DP44 Switch.

My current readings on SAT 119 are:
-----------
1 102
2 0
3 105
4 0
5 100
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 100
10 0
11 100
12 0
13 0
14 0
15 96
16 0
17 0
18 0
19 100
20 0
21 102

Do I need to replace my DPP44 switch?
8 Replies · 2662 views
C
might want to check connectors for corrosion, too. Anywhere the connectors are out in the whether, even if they are under an eave.
styxfix
hokiecb said:
unplug the power inserter from the electrical outlet and wait about 30 seconds. It's hooked to port one on the switch on the output side. After that try a check switch.

I unpluged the power inserter when I changed the cable from Port 1 from the DP Quad in to Port 4 into "To Dish 1" on the DPP44. I installed the DP Quad with four cables but was using only three of them.

Can you bypass the switch on at least one receiver to rule out the LNB? I know you said some aren't using it and those are fine, but possibly the feeds from the quad to the switch are having problem. Also, is 119 on input 1 of your switch?

The DP Quad, like the DP Twin, combines both 119 &110 on each one of it's outputs, so I don't know how to put just 119 on input 1 of the DPP44 switch. I had Port one and Port two of the DP Quad going to the same number on the DPP44 switch. Port 3 of the DP QUAD was for the 508. Port 4 of the DP Quad I wasn't using yet until today when I tried to see if it would work better than Port 1. No difference. I have a wing sat w/ a DP single connected to "To Dish #3" on the DPP44 Switch

might want to check connectors for corrosion, too. Anywhere the connectors are out in the whether, even if they are under an eave.

While the switch is outside somewhat exposed because it's not under an eve, it is mounted in the right direction and each of connectors do have big blck rubber insulators on them. The connectors look OK. I didn't see any rust or black corrosion in them. Sould I spray some WD-40 on them?
hokiecb
You might consider placing a new cable from 119 to the switch. I think that the even transponders are on a higher frequency 1650-2150MHz w/DP equipment as opposed to the lower 950-1450 of odd transponders , so that would indicate a bad connector as chadzx stated. It also could indicate a bad cable from DP quad to the DPP 44 since corrosion or other cable deformity would probably cause the cable to loose higher frequency transmissions first. Also when you hook the DP quad up to a switch, the lnb ports connected to the switch dont function as a switch anymore so port 1 on the quad would be 119 and port 2 would be 110.
SatinKzo
styxfix said:
The DP Quad, like the DP Twin, combines both 119 &110 on each one of it's outputs, so I don't know how to put just 119 on input 1 of the DPP44 switch. I had Port one and Port two of the DP Quad going to the same number on the DPP44 switch. Port 3 of the DP QUAD was for the 508. Port 4 of the DP Quad I wasn't using yet until today when I tried to see if it would work better than Port 1. No difference. I have a wing sat w/ a DP single connected to "To Dish #3" on the DPP44 Switch
I know how the switches and lnbs work, I was asking because when you do a check switch with a dish multiswitch, the sats all come in on seperate ports, no matter what the LNB is sending, the switch treats them as seperate feeds. If you switch cables around and then do a check switch, different sats are on different ports. You say you had port 1 and 2 going to the respective sat inputs on the switch. WHen you did a check switch, what sats showed up on port 1 & 2. If you swapped the inputs on the switch, the sats would switch on the check switch.

If you bypass the switch and go directly to a receiver, your receiver will register 119 and 110, I wasn't asking you to just send 119. Sorry for the confusion on that one.

I asked about 119 on port 1 cause it is the preferred way to have the hookup register with the receivers. I know from personal experience that a very similar problem you stated occurred to me when I did some rewiring in my basement and hooked 110 up to port 1 on my DPP44. A day later I lost channels, guide data was missing, transponders were in and out.

I don't want to see you buy a new expensive DPP44 if you don't have to. Just trying to help you eliminate all the variables.
styxfix
WHen you did a check switch, what sats showed up on port 1 & 2. If you swapped the inputs on the switch, the sats would switch on the check switch.

110 & 61.5 sat show up. I get in X where 119 sat would be.

If I have four sat locations (129 & 61.5) and I'm not using a superdish do I still need to put a check the "Superdish" icon?

Currently, I borrowed a couple of DP-21 switches and a DP sat. splitter for my DP-single LNB so that I can get my 921 up and running for the Superbowl Party. But since I had only one line to the 921, I had to run a seperate long cable through the door inside the house to where the 921 is. It working fine with the two DP-21switches and the DP Quad.

I asked about 119 on port 1 cause it is the preferred way to have the hookup register with the receivers.

Would it worth the trouble trying to connect Port 2 or Port 3 to "Dish 1" on the DPP-44 to see if it can pick up the 119 sat? It's mostly just the even transpoders that are missing.

I don't want to see you buy a new expensive DPP44 if you don't have to.
You are not kidding!! I hate wasting more money on this stuff.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68774 Replies · 2687512 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
sdfntx
It's a Good Night for Singing - Jerry Jeff Walker
long_time_Dish
All Night Long - Joe Walsh
M
Night Fever - Bee Gees
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
long_time_Dish
Night By Night - Steely Dan
RaiderPower
Day By Day - Godspell
b4pjoe
Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
18 Replies · 381 views
harshness
Given that Tubi is one of the hottest FAST services out there, I don't expect it to go anywhere. Building up intolerance for ads takes a while, and as long as the advertisers are willing to foot the bill, why not?
dishstaller
Building up intolerance for ads takes a while, and as long as the advertisers are willing to foot the bill, why not?
That is what I have to explain to customers all the time. They want it free with no ads :facepalm
  • Like
Reactions: navychop
navychop
Hmmm. Not watching much Prime, but it would be on our Apple TV STB.

You know of any drawbacks using Ultra and Prime?
osu1991
Hmmm. Not watching much Prime, but it would be on our Apple TV STB.

You know of any drawbacks using Ultra and Prime?
Prime seems to have a problem passing the DV/HDR metadata to Roku and Apple devices, but no problem with their Fire devices.
  • Like
Reactions: navychop
Juan
That is what I have to explain to customers all the time. They want it free with no ads :facepalm
The ads are boring and repetitive...same ad over and over...bring back 1970s ads..might not be as big an issue
HipKat
Shouldn't this thread be in the IPTV forum?
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
dishstaller
The ads are boring and repetitive...same ad over and over...bring back 1970s ads..might not be as big an issue
Had a customer come in a couple weeks ago to pay her internet bill. She let me know in no uncertain terms that she did NOT appreciate me running the same ads over and over. I looked at her and waited for her to laugh and say she was just joking.......still waiting for that laugh.
osu1991
Shouldn't this thread be in the IPTV forum?
There is one there too. I would think either is justifiable as they make both the device and provide a streaming program service.

ewindowman
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th
459 Replies · 16030 views
nelson61
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Scott Greczkowski
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Can't remember where or who I saw predict this. :D

It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Bruce
It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
Scott Greczkowski
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Bruce
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.
S
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.
dish has new sats dtv does not
R
dish has new sats dtv does not
Hate to say this no one is ordering Satellite TV. Both DISH and Direct no new customers.
After 25 years with centurylink DSL 80 speed i changed to Xfinity 300 speed for $50 wow lightning fast for streaming. Still have DISH 27 years with them. Americas 250 package for $103. What you think of superbox or vseebox for streaming is it legal?
Still dish is easy to operate and change channels. What will Charlie Ergen do with new super satellites with loosing customers with satellites and boost?
S
Hate to say this no one is ordering Satellite TV. Both DISH and Direct no new customers.
After 25 years with centurylink DSL 80 speed i changed to Xfinity 300 speed for $50 wow lightning fast for streaming. Still have DISH 27 years with them. Americas 250 package for $103. What you think of superbox or vseebox for streaming is it legal?
Still dish is easy to operate and change channels. What will Charlie Ergen do with new super satellites with loosing customers with satellites and boost?
While I agree but dish just launched a new sat. That can be used as an asset for Elon. Maybe he will repurpose em for his cell service. And if he wants tv to. God knows why he would but I think he will get a great deal on the contracts in place and equipment!!! I could think of better things to spend my money on. And to be honest Elon has nothing to offer me have blazing fast internet and ill never buy an ev. The veesee box and the super box are illegal.
tanman
For your viewing pleasure...
comfortably_numb
For your viewing pleasure...

That's ok, I'm sure Verizon will be happy to take them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
That's ok, I'm sure Verizon will be happy to take them.
That's ALL Verizon needs.....more congested towers :mad:
comfortably_numb
That's ALL Verizon needs.....more congested towers :mad:

They don't care... they're milkin' the cow. Buddying up with Elon to provide him an MVNO network will make their investors and shareholders salivate. All of their recent marketing efforts have failed, so this move makes a lot of sense.
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
185 Replies · 3469 views
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
R
A lot of upsets yesterday, but my LSU Tigers won.
Y
Parity is growing in College Football. Making it even harder to tell who is better than each other.
rvvaquero
Parity is growing in College Football. Making it even harder to tell who is better than each other.
I agree to a point. The transfer policy is creating parity, but only for the top 20-25 teams. The other 110+ teams in the FBS are just breeding grounds for the bigger schools which have more money and more recruiting appeal.

If a smaller school recruits, trains, and matures a quality player, they can't keep them past their sophomore year because the bigger schools snatch them up. Example: LSU didn't cultivate Sam Leavitt, they just harvested him from other schools. LSU is a top contender, in large part because of Leavitt. Michigan State and Arizona State.................are not. If either of those schools had been able to retain his services, who knows where they would be now.
T
A lot of upsets yesterday, but my LSU Tigers won.
Coach says afternoon game result of SEC "conspiracy". The rivalry game vs. Ala. will kick off in the afternoon at Baton Rouge rather than at night, which head coach Lane Kiffin says is intentional in order to neutralize fan craziness and noise, which is believed to help lead to wins for squads playing at home. "Obviously the SEC wanted to change this year from how it had been to give LSU less advantage, (considering) how well LSU plays at night and how intimidating it is to play here. So I guess when I look at it that way, I'm not surprised."

But he's come up with an ingenious solution. "Go to bed earlier Fri. night, then start your day earlier. Have breakfast earlier. Start drinking earlier. Whatever your routine is, just move it up."

Meantime ads have been running for a "Protect College Sports Act" moving through Congress.
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

23 Replies · 946 views
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
Tom Speer
Optimum, which bought up our previous cable company, Suddenlink (originally COX), replac ed all of their coax disdribution with Fiber several years ago. They ran new fiber links to the house, but installed RFOG (RF over glass) devices on the outside of the house, which makes the house coax system look like a cable system. They used DOCSIS modems and of course we had the same assymetric bandwidth of cable internet. When I called them a couple years ago, and said I had installed a connection to the local Fiber provideer, MetroNet, They panicked and offered me the 300 MBit "Fiber powered" cable service for $20 per month. They were bleeding customers. I cancelled my Metronet and went with the $20 deal for a year, even though I didn't like the old cable technology.

Then T-moble Fiber struck a deal with Metronet Fiber where T-mobile would take over the marketing, billing and customer relations for residential Customers. They offered a "Founders Deal" for 2 Gigabit service, symmetric speeds, for $70 per month for new customers. That included all taxes and fees and was guaranteed for 10 years. I couldn't resist. That deal is no longer offered, but I am set for 9 more years.

Now the successor to the old local telephone company, Brightspeed has also installed a modern Fiber system in the neighborhood, but won't be getting my business. But their Fiber technology is also superior to Optimums cable based system.

With Fiber competition, the cable companies are eventually doomed.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Foxbat
Meanwhile, my neighbor 300' away has gigabit fiber, and I'm stuck with copper solutions.
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Bobby
S
Meanwhile, my neighbor 300' away has gigabit fiber, and I'm stuck with copper solutions.
similar situation. almost every neighborhood around me has fiber, but our 3 block area. I called AT&T and was like, how hard is it to bring fiber over about 200 feet (I am closest to the folks with fiber and can see it on the poles from my front door); crickets and very frustrating.
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
ncted
similar situation. almost every neighborhood around me has fiber, but our 3 block area. I called AT&T and was like, how hard is it to bring fiber over about 200 feet (I am closest to the folks with fiber and can see it on the poles from my front door); crickets and very frustrating.
"Business Intelligence" is more of an oxymoron than Military Intelligence.
TRG
TRG
Meanwhile, my neighbor 300' away has gigabit fiber, and I'm stuck with copper solutions.
I have gigabit fiber in an underground box on my property. But it's not lit up yet so I'm stuck with copper too. For now anyway.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and Foxbat
G
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
After a strange reboot last night in the middle of viewing, this morning several more reboots and about a half an hour download.
1 Replies · 82 views
Almighty1
Just did the update check manually about an hour ago with Hopper 3 on H713 and Hopper Plus on P15403.
Noticed something new when I clicked on the Update Software, it presented a pop-up as follows:
"Update software 1573
Update later Update now Cancel" with those three buttons which did not exist before.

After updating the H715 - I guess there must be major bugs as both H709 and H714 were skipped.

So here are the issue(s):

Issue #1
It did fix the problem with H713 which was:
"One of the problems I am seeing is that the Available Joey Software section no longer is showing the Android TV versions even after a manual software reset twice and the nightly reboot. Until it does, nether Technician Android TV download and Hopper Plus is able to check, download and update the Android TV software."

This was a major problem with H703.

H710 removed that dependency so H711 and H712 were working without that dependency but H713 brought it back which is fixed in H715 as no P versions or Android TV versions are shown in the Available Joey Software on the main Diagnostics screen.
However, with that said, the TECHNICIAN SETTINGS, Download ATV (Android TV) Files is not working correctly as the Download ATV Files shows:
"Download ATV Files 3000
Download in progress. This operation will be
complete when the files are downloaded

Joey 4 : P554- Failed
Joey 4 : P55403- Failed
Wireless Joey 4 : P654- Failed
Wireless Joey 4 : P65403- Complete
HopperPlus : P154- Complete
HopperPlus : P15403- Failed

OK"
From what I can tell, each of them goes through the Downloading followed by the Processing stages first before it goes into the Failed or Complete stage. It seemed to be going in a loop earlier as it will start downloading from the first item being the Joey 4 each time before it eventually stopped. This is the first time ever since 2023 that I had ever seen it Failed.

With that said, the dependency appears to still be required for the Hopper Plus to check, download and update the Android TV software as it says Failed, No Target when going to "Device Preferences", About, "Software Update"

Issue #2
Still cannot cast to Hopper 3 with Hopper Plus(Software P15317) with the Hopper Plus "Google Chromecast Built-In" feature" as it shows up as a casting device when the Hopper Plus is online and disappears when the Hopper 3 and Hopper Plus does it's nightly reboots but times out when one tries to cast to it and always shows up as Not available in the Google Home app on Android phone. No one else anywhere on the internet had confirmed whether it is working for them or not. Per brittanygarden in DM on October 16, 2026:
"We've been working with Google on this. We have a fix on the Google side projected for Q4. I know we're in Q4 now, but I will try to get a narrowed down timeline for you."

brittanygarden and Rick Durham

jsmit86 and naptime - If you are able to use H715, does the issue mentioned below still exist?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Videos like this can make you appreciate the things we take for granted.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/a2cgQidHQJI
6 Replies · 161 views
Bobby
Videos like this can make you appreciate the things we take for granted.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/a2cgQidHQJI

That brought tears to my eyes.
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
dishstaller
That brought tears to my eyes.
Really...REALLY hate to do this to you Bobby, but....


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsOo3jzkhYA&pp=ygUed29tYW4gaGVhcnMgZm9yIHRoZSBmaXJzdCB0aW1l
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch and Bobby
dishstaller
Okay....if you think you can take it....this one brought tears to my eyes when I first saw it and did again just now.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/i5UCDwHMatg?feature=share
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch and Bobby
dishstaller
This came up in my suggestions probably because of the video I posted. I had NO idea exactly what being color blind actually was. Now I understand why that man was so blown away with seeing the trees......a lot of color blind people see green as brown, so grass, trees, etc all look brown.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i18_RngKJDQ
Juan
Its a shame nobody told him orange was blue and red was purple etc etc etc
T
Often people who have organic vision or hearing activated as adults after never having had it cannot practically utilize it because their brains never developed the massive neural network needed to make sense of any of it.

Well, he sees in color, just differently. Can't he just enjoy that? My granny had anachromatic color blindness, meaning pretty much like a b&w tv