Social Feed

cablewithaview said:

A federal judge ruled Monday that DirecTV must stop running ads claiming that its HDTV service is superior to cable's, pending the outcome of a false-advertising suit Time Warner Cable filed against the direct-broadcast satellite operator.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Time Warner's request for a preliminary injunction to block DirecTV's ads, featuring William Shatner and Jessica Simpson, from being shown while the lawsuit proceeds.

In December, Time Warner sued DirecTV for false advertising after the DBS operator ran the HD spots, as well as newspaper ads claiming that cable subscribers wouldn't be able to watch games carried by NFL Network -- available on DirecTV, but not Time Warner -- that would have been available via local broadcast stations.

DirecTV originally agreed to stop running the HD-oriented comparative ads, which included the tag line: "For picture quality that beats cable, you've got to get DirecTV."

However, DirecTV's revised ads included a tag line that Time Warner contended was still false: "For an HD picture that can't be beat, you've got to get DirecTV." With the ruling Monday, the DBS operator is barred from making that claim.

Swain said DirecTV may still run comparative ads stating that its overall picture quality is better than Time Warner's. In addition, she denied the MSO's request that the DBS operator be required to run "corrective" ads.

In a prepared statement, DirecTV said, "We will continue to aggressively market our better overall picture quality, which is permitted by the court's opinion, and soon far more HD capacity than cable. It's obvious [that Time Warner's] strategy is to fight with us in the courts since they can't compete with our superior product in the marketplace. We are confident that we will prevail on both fronts."

The judge set a pretrial conference for March 23.



http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413602.html?display=Breaking+News

Click to expand...

Jimbos said:

Another great frivilouis lawsuit and someone's actually going to listen to them.
This kind of commercial happens every day pushing many products.

D* has another one out now stating that they will have 3 x's the HD channels soon than cable ... I suppose tyhey will file suit on that one too, even if it IS true.

Why dosn't the judge make Time Warner prove that the D* ad is not true first ?

Jimbo

Click to expand...

iceturkee said:

well, i disagree jimbo.....my cable companies hd pq is far superior to d*'s!! i just hope the sports addict in me isn't going to regret switching back to satellite!!!

Click to expand...

philhu said:

No, DTV says they will have '3x the capacity for HD than cable'

Not that they will have that many channels....

Click to expand...

Jimbos said:

It said Cable Companies, that means ALL, you cannot tell me that ALL cable has better HD
Jimbo

Click to expand...

Sean Mota said:

I agree. HD Lite is not HD. I seem to recall that I posted about this deceptive practice when the ad first come out and I was quite bashed on this very forum. I wish all deceptive practices are taking to court... Dish and everyone else who claims to have the Best HD when we all know that they only provide HD Lite.

Click to expand...

A federal judge says the satcaster has not proven its high-def service is better than cable.

Click to expand...