Anthropic researcher quits in protest. Gives AI warning

[comfortably_numb]

We Asked AI How It Could Kill Humanity

Let's get on with it then.

 

[primestar31]

Let's get on with it then.

This was 1970, and one of my favorite movies. The trailer is a few minutes long, but it's worth watching all the way:


View: https://youtu.be/kyOEwiQhzMI?si=VwQXbsd4w745f7Zb

 

[dishstaller]

This was 1970, and one of my favorite movies. The trailer is a few minutes long, but it's worth watching all the way:


View: https://youtu.be/kyOEwiQhzMI?si=VwQXbsd4w745f7Zb

My Father in law LOVES that movie.

 

[dishstaller]

I think each of these companies are "sounding the alarm" for financial reasons, they want to keep the gravy train rolling or think they are behind the others.

If you had watched that Matt Walsh podcast I linked to, you would see that the purpose is for government to step in and regulate, therefore cementing the existing companies and the top of the heap and blocking any future competition.

 

[(((Garyd)))]

Just ask ChatGPT.
It has it's own ideas about the potential for "Skynet".
I don't trust ChatGPT

"The biggest uncertainty is how capable future AI systems can become and how reliably we can control them. We don't currently have a scientifically validated way to assign a meaningful percentage to "probability of Skynet." Anyone giving you something like "there's a 17.3% chance" is mostly expressing a subjective forecast rather than measuring a known quantity.

My personal bottom line: I wouldn't worry about a robot uprising. I would take seriously the possibility that humans eventually build systems more capable than our ability to reliably understand, constrain, or supervise them. That's a much more mundane—and potentially much more dangerous—version of the Skynet problem."
.......

The old site is back up.

 

[comfortably_numb]

This was 1970, and one of my favorite movies. The trailer is a few minutes long, but it's worth watching all the way:


View: https://youtu.be/kyOEwiQhzMI?si=VwQXbsd4w745f7Zb

"How many times a week do you require a woman?"

 

[dishdude]

If you had watched that Matt Walsh podcast I linked to, you would see that the purpose is for government to step in and regulate, therefore cementing the existing companies and the top of the heap and blocking any future competition.

Certainly falls into the financial reasons I speculated. No industry goes to the government asking for regulation unless it's going to benefit them and they have the lobbyists writing the bills that ensures they benefit.