Apple, Google Collect User Data

But google let's you opt out, and they only keep the last 200 data points on the device. Apple has screwed the pooch with this one,

Sent from my iPad using SatelliteGuys
 
Cell companies have been tracking us since inception. So what if the cell phone does too, now?
 
It is a little bit like writing viruses/trojans: as long as it is sufficiently hard to do, it is mostly done by responsible people without too much risk to end user.
When it is brought down to the level of script kiddies - it's a nightmare. The moment you can monetize it - it is the same as war on drugs, i.e. never ends.

Apple's sin is not as much collecting the data (in one form or another all do that), but making it easy for any schmuck to access it.
Considering how easy iPhones can be hacked, this literally means only the lazy won't know your whereabouts over the last year if you use an iOS4 device...

Apple told the US Congress in 2010
To provide the high quality products and services that its customers demand, Apple must have access to the comprehensive location-based information.
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/137...e-comprehensive-user-location-data-on-you.htm

They will start hiding it better and the issue will go away, just like antennagate...

Diogen.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm. That puts it in a harsher light. Is this data accessible remotely or would they need your phone in hand?
 
And now it's official
Apple officially answers questions on location tracking, says it doesn't do it -- Engadget
Since St. Jobs voiced his point of view before, Apple's response was very predictable. And magical, of course...

"Apple is not tracking the location of your iPhone."
Data is collected for almost a year, it is known at least since September, police is using it, etc.
And nothing to do with the Cupertino fruit company except for some bugs that will be fixed?

Only an Apple user can believe this magic sh!t... And maybe the government if paid enough...

Diogen.

EDIT: Best summary
[Apple] admits underestimating stupidity of its users
Apple has clarified that it does not store location data on handsets, and that it does, and that it's going to stop soon... only it isn't... and it's nothing to worry about anyway.
 
Last edited:
It is not like every cell phone company does not know where you phone is and where it has been.

Apple claims that the data is used to help the GPS home in quicker: Apple Plans Fix for iPhone Location Data - WSJ.com

Apple said Wednesday it isn't tracking the location of iPhones, "has never done so and has no plans to ever do so."

"Users are confused, partly because the creators of this new technology (including Apple) have not provided enough education about these issues to date," the company said.

Apple said it maintains a database of Wi-Fi hot spots and cell towers around users' locations, a process that helps the phone calculate its location. The information is used to quickly find global-positioning-system satellites, a process that otherwise could take several minutes, the Cupertino, Calif., company said.
 
most people don't realize this..but ALL 3G phones with E911 tracking collect this data and have been for years..u never really had in privacy with a cell phone
 
The capability is there and should be there. The devil is in the details: implementation.

Is it an opt-in or opt-out feature? What's the default? Can you change it?
Is it stored locally? Encrypted? What encryption? How is it accessed?
Is the information sent to base? How often? Is this data archived or deleted?
Is it always on? Can it be activated remotely? Who can? How is the decision made?

If this network setup is as sh!tty as the PSN (or like Apple's) it is a disaster waiting to happen...

Diogen.
 
I don't have a problem with Apple collecting data on the phone to improve location services (which it does pretty well), but I have a problem with it:

1) not being encrypted
2) transferring to the PC/Mac upon sync
3) Not being purged.

I think the Google approach of the last 200 points, and only keeping it on the phone, makes much more sense.

I don't think this actually was a conspiracy, but just bad judgment on their part.
 
The capability is there and should be there. The devil is in the details: implementation.

Is it an opt-in or opt-out feature? What's the default? Can you change it?
Is it stored locally? Encrypted? What encryption? How is it accessed?
Is the information sent to base? How often? Is this data archived or deleted?
Is it always on? Can it be activated remotely? Who can? How is the decision made?

If this network setup is as sh!tty as the PSN (or like Apple's) it is a disaster waiting to happen...

Diogen.
if u "opt out" will many popular features cease to work? probably
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
0
Views
203
Social Influencers
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
T
T
Replies
0
Views
782
Social Influencers
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
T
T
Replies
0
Views
434
Social Influencers
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
T
T
Replies
0
Views
790
Social Influencers
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
T

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top