At&t Anti Trust case (1 Viewer)

Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

Tampa8

Supporting Founder - I'll stand up and say so
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 8, 2003
18,029
7,537
Tampa/Eastern Ct
Keep an eye on that trial that starts this week. If they lose against the Government's assertion that buying Time Warner creates too much broad content with one company one outcome is At&t might spin off one of it's assets. It isn't going to be anything concerning streaming or Cell service. So if they feel Time Warner is important what is left to spin off? Hint - They have already made reference to it not being their long term goal.....Hmmm I know.....
 
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

JSheridan

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Feb 16, 2008
8,899
9,995
USA
uh... is it toys'r'us? :biggrin

IMHO they can spin off DirecTV just as long as there's no merger with DISH involved.
 

navychop

Member of the Month - July 2014!
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2005
52,284
17,262
Northern VA
I suspect this trial will take months, and probably end in an out of court settlement.
 

KAB

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 20, 2005
20,594
3,929
Fishers, IN
If dish buys Directv I will fight it because that means I’m pretty much done with satellite.

I hear AT&T digital life is the one they are trying to get rid of
Home security/automation is a comparative drop in the bucket here (financially and market impact). It's probably worth selling out of, but I doubt it would be much of a bargaining chip in this matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheKrell

MitchDeerfield

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 1, 2016
897
507
Florida
I can't see AT&T losing this anti-trust case. It isn't like they have a monopoly on cable access or tv programming. There are the legacy competitors plus at least 8 OTT competitors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JSheridan

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Feb 16, 2008
8,899
9,995
USA
It seems pretty plain that if the same company owns DirecTV, UVerse and a bunch of different channels they could easily make it impossible or prohibitively expensive for other providers to have access to those channels. That would be called a trust or monopoly, which is illegal.
 

dare2be

SatelliteGuys God
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 15, 2011
12,661
7,521
FL
It seems pretty plain that if the same company owns DirecTV, UVerse and a bunch of different channels they could easily make it impossible or prohibitively expensive for other providers to have access to those channels. That would be called a trust or monopoly, which is illegal.
Comcast Sportsnet *cough cough*
 
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top