No, it was the controls that screwed us. CAIR and FAIR as roughly outlined above are the reason Banks had to loan to people who lacked the ability to repay the loan.
Health care is in the process of getting thoroughly screwed. My wife pays 30% of her practices revenue on administrative costs to comply with all the laws regulating her profession. Research HEPA. That piece of legislative garbage required her to spend $100s of thousands to educate her office in how to comply with the new laws and pay for software that is HEPA compliant. In addition to this, about 50% goes to mandated insurance policies. She is seriously considering dropping all Medicare patients because the fed only pays $.60 on the dollar. Do the math.
Health care paperwork study
Study shows U.S. health care paperwork cost $294.3 billion in 1999 | HarvardScience
Ok, since you have all your abbreviations wrong, I'm gonna have to guess you don't know what you are talking about.
On the most pressing matter, the regulations you speak of were not the problem.
The Community Reinvestment Act actually dates well before Clinton's time. It has been amended several times. Note, however, that it applies to banks and not to the people that made all the stupid loans. You see, in the "old days" people loaned money only to people they thought were trustworthy and would repay the loan in the long run. Mortgage brokers and securitization changed that. Brokers only had to make sure someone didn't default for 90 days - that is all they were responsible for. The people that bought the mortgages in order to securitize them didn't look closely enough - and the securities ratings firms basically didn't look at all. What you had was a bunch of guys that were greedy.
The homeowner was greedy - they expected their home to rocket in value and to be able to refi out some more money for their next toy. The mortgage brokers gave loans to people they knew had no way to keep payments up - but 90 days at a 2% teaser rate was a cinch. The securities dealers made their money by being a middle man - they bought the mortgages and packaged them - their criteria? Do so in the least cost manner - WHAT they were buying or selling had nothing to do with it because the end BUYERS were also greedy and being told these were AAA and wouldn't go down.
Finally, the investment banks were given the green light in 2005 to BREAK the rules and lever 40 to 1. At 40 to 1 it takes a 2.5% decline to WIPE YOU OUT. No one can hedge that well - no one. It was a lit fuse.
So, don't lecture me on what you have no idea about.