Not that I want AT&T to own Directv or Dish Network, but I would rather they spent the money on extending DSL coverage and buy a satellite provider for video. If I was on the board and running things, it would be that strategy or fiber all the way. As good as copper has been over the years, it just cant cut the new HD age. They are unfortunately going to find out the hard and expensive way years from now. But of course, the CEO will get a nice exit pay of 100 million for making the wrong decision.
Brewer,
You quotes here are exactly correct, and I hate it.
They have fiber (in some areas) running to the neighborhoods and the last leg goes on copper.
I too think they are wasting thier time on this and wish they would just buy one of the sat providers for video.
Copper has been around forever and still working well in the majority of situations, but I personally would not be trying to run video over it when they had an oppretunity to go ALL fiber and decided to go only part way. Going fiber all the way would require years in placement to entire cities but would be the right thing to do in the long run, of course this should have been started a long time ago, not in the last year.
After watching them closely, you never see them take a chance on something and potentially be the 1st to try something and have others follow them, it's always lets see how so and so does this or that and then decide if it's worth it, if it is we will go that route also, consequently they end up 3-4 years behind others and by the time the AT&T stuff is ready to run, the next hot option is already being pushed by the compitition.
jmo,
Jimbo