Drug probe leads to Vick's property

LMAO....if you KNEW football as much as you thought....you would be a GM!! I would take Vick over a old, hard-headed Farve ANYDAY and so would 99% of the league....!!

I doubt that. I would take Favre any day, with Equal talent on both teams. And Favre would win. He can throw the ball and Vick can't so much. You see Vick never gets to his third receiver sometimes not even his 2nd before he tucks and runs. He can decipher defenses well and is a questionable leader at best. He constantly faults his receivers instead of looking in the mirror and nutting up and shutting up and doing his job. Favre is not perfect by any means and his best days are behind him. Still better than Vick.

The Falcons are dipsh*ts for trading Shaub also.
 
I doubt that. I would take Favre any day, with Equal talent on both teams. And Favre would win. He can throw the ball and Vick can't so much. You see Vick never gets to his third receiver sometimes not even his 2nd before he tucks and runs. He can decipher defenses well and is a questionable leader at best. He constantly faults his receivers instead of looking in the mirror and nutting up and shutting up and doing his job. Favre is not perfect by any means and his best days are behind him. Still better than Vick.

The Falcons are dipsh*ts for trading Shaub also.

Try NOT thinking with your heart and WITH your head.....I LOVE my Raiders....and I HOPED they would win EVERY GAME last year....but I KNEW my head was right when it said 'Raiders will lose AT LEAST 12 games' ...and it was right, it lost FOURTEEN!!....Try that sometime....Brett Farve has been over the hill for at least 2 years....and the ONLY reason they didn't dump him is because the it would be a marketing nightmare....he is been the face of the franchise...though they have had good players around him....
 
Try NOT thinking with your heart and WITH your head.....I LOVE my Raiders....and I HOPED they would win EVERY GAME last year....but I KNEW my head was right when it said 'Raiders will lose AT LEAST 12 games' ...and it was right, it lost FOURTEEN!!....Try that sometime....Brett Farve has been over the hill for at least 2 years....and the ONLY reason they didn't dump him is because the it would be a marketing nightmare....he is been the face of the franchise...though they have had good players around him....

yup...you're right I was thinking with my heart. But, I would still not take Vick regardless if Favre was there or not. Vick is not a NFL QB who can consistently make the right decision and consistently throw the right pass. Both have been proven repeatedly on and off the field in recent seasons.
 
yup...you're right I was thinking with my heart. But, I would still not take Vick regardless if Favre was there or not. Vick is not a NFL QB who can consistently make the right decision and consistently throw the right pass. Both have been proven repeatedly on and off the field in recent seasons.

You keep thinking that way....:up IF ANYONE knows about seeing too many 'has-beens' be your starting QB....it would be a Raider fan....:(
 

Way to go NHL

Cyclist Landis says lawyer asked him to implicate Armstrong

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top