I have been trying out the R v50 for the last few days. Here are my observations/comments:
Touch pad: This is a substitute for the arrow keys and page up/dn keys. It is not like a graphical cursor key that one cam move diagonally across the screen (like a mouse on a laptop w a trackpad). So, one cannot go directly to an icon on, say the DVR|Recorded Programs screen. One has to swipe left/right or up/dn to step to the desired icon.. or bid swipes up/dn to go page up/dn.
Conclusion: R v40 with buttons to do this directly is more convenient.
Voice control: (this should really be Voice input). The quality of voice transcription is pretty good (except for international channel program names
But this is helpful only when entering a string for the Search function. Voice control is clunky for playback control (saying Pause.. rewind 10 seconds .. fast forward ..STOP..Play is awkward and gets old really fast!!). The VCR controls and the skip back/ahead buttons on R v 40 are way easier to use to control the exact place to playback.
Conclusion: R v40 is has better user experience except when entering strings.
Rant: the problem is exacerbated by not having a cheat sheet of voice commands that the system accepts. I guess the user is expected to play around (like with Siri ?) to "discover" what the system can do. So, one is left wondering .. Should I say .. Goto CNN ...or .. Find CNN.. or .. channel up.. or ..show CNN..
It is easier to type 200.
Please help me like this remote. And re-hire the folks who designed R v40!!
Aloke
Touch pad: This is a substitute for the arrow keys and page up/dn keys. It is not like a graphical cursor key that one cam move diagonally across the screen (like a mouse on a laptop w a trackpad). So, one cannot go directly to an icon on, say the DVR|Recorded Programs screen. One has to swipe left/right or up/dn to step to the desired icon.. or bid swipes up/dn to go page up/dn.
Conclusion: R v40 with buttons to do this directly is more convenient.
Voice control: (this should really be Voice input). The quality of voice transcription is pretty good (except for international channel program names
Conclusion: R v40 is has better user experience except when entering strings.
Rant: the problem is exacerbated by not having a cheat sheet of voice commands that the system accepts. I guess the user is expected to play around (like with Siri ?) to "discover" what the system can do. So, one is left wondering .. Should I say .. Goto CNN ...or .. Find CNN.. or .. channel up.. or ..show CNN..
It is easier to type 200.
Please help me like this remote. And re-hire the folks who designed R v40!!
Aloke
). There is a threshold of perfection needed that is hard to achieve. The voice recognition and UI has to be perfect (near perfect is not good enough) where one can speak and expect (without the need to verify!) the correct interpretation and execution. It will gradually become irksome if one has to check after speaking if the command was correctly interpreted and carried out. That's why most people I know give up on Siri etc after the initial novelty has faded. The same will happen to R v50.