MAX Changing Names Again...

1747233963116.png
 
I need to find one of my older posts, when I said the name change to MAX was incredibly stupid, since they were getting rid of a name that has been around since the 70's.
 
And in another year or two they will rename it to just HBO. High level thinking on their part.
Probably will have to be, since they are spinning off the cable channels into a new company, except HBO.

Hearing rumors they are not signing any new deals from this point forward, regarding new content for their formerly Discovery owned channels, just letting current deals expire.

Already eliminated new scripted content for TNT and TBS, makes sense they would do so for the other channels, since they are going to lose about 7 Million more per sub fees this year, around the same next year.
 
Probably will have to be, since they are spinning off the cable channels into a new company, except HBO.

Hearing rumors they are not signing any new deals from this point forward, regarding new content for their formerly Discovery owned channels, just letting current deals expire.

Already eliminated new scripted content for TNT and TBS, makes sense they would do so for the other channels, since they are going to lose about 7 Million more per sub fees this year, around the same next year.
Neither of your last two paragraphs are accurate. I'm 100% certain. Nor does it make any sense as the majority of their cash comes from the linear networks and there would be no reason to cut off that cash flow stream. It also goes completely against what they said in their earnings call last week about the importance of the linear business and the slowing of losses there or their recently announced new linear carriage deals with both Comcast and Charter. Finally, they didn't eliminate their new scripted content as they showed multiple programs at their upfront presentation today (including the next iterations of the Librarians series).
The first paragraph is unlikely since 1) there is no actual announced spin off 2) most importantly, internationally HBO is being reported with the global linear networks segment as laid out in their Q1 10-Q.
 
The first paragraph is unlikely since 1) there is no actual announced spin off 2) most importantly, internationally HBO is being reported with the global linear networks segment as laid out in their Q1 10-Q.
Dude, so far here, lately, thanks to my friend giving me insider info, I have posted here that Comcast/Universal will be spinning off their cable channels, a month before it was announced, I announced ESPN will be launching a streaming version a year before it was announced, which I also included some of the plans, like teaming up with gambling companies.

I also said that Fox was looking to team up with Disney, putting their sports content on ESPN, then talks feel apart.

All of the above, I backed up with links after they were announced, which I included my original post.

Everytime you post something about the entertainment industry, you have been wrong, the last time we interacted , you said I was incorrect on Hollywood's share of China's Box Office, I wrote it was 25%, then I backed it up with a link, then you went radio silent.

Here is where you are incorrect again-

On the earnings call, Zaslav declined to say whether a spinoff at his company was in the works.

"We can move quickly if we decide to change," Zaslav said.

The company posted a net loss of $453 million, which underscored continued struggles in key business units, including lower television advertising at its cable channels.



 
Dude, so far here, lately, thanks to my friend giving me insider info, I have posted here that Comcast/Universal will be spinning off their cable channels, a month before it was announced, I announced ESPN will be launching a streaming version a year before it was announced, which I also included some of the plans, like teaming up with gambling companies.

I also said that Fox was looking to team up with Disney, putting their sports content on ESPN, then talks feel apart.

All of the above, I backed up with links after they were announced, which I included my original post.

Everytime you post something about the entertainment industry, you have been wrong, the last time we interacted , you said I was incorrect on Hollywood's share of China's Box Office, I wrote it was 25%, then I backed it up with a link, then you went radio silent.

Here is where you are incorrect again-

On the earnings call, Zaslav declined to say whether a spinoff at his company was in the works.

"We can move quickly if we decide to change," Zaslav said.

The company posted a net loss of $453 million, which underscored continued struggles in key business units, including lower television advertising at its cable channels.



I know you think you have full knowledge here. Trust me I have better knowledge on this specific subject than you do. He declined to comment. That doesn't mean a transaction is in the works. There are implications on what is confirmed or denied in the SEC space and that is why most of the time the C-suite will decline to discuss any type of transactions. Will there be a transaction. Possible. But to assume that something is being spun off is just not correct. On the advertising side I didn't say it was going up! I said that the declines were slowing. It is still a HUGE portion of their cash flow generation. Have you watched any of the upfront presentations from companies this week so far? The information there is important.
 
Oh and on the China box takes. I didn't remember the exact %. I didn't say you were wrong. I just said it was less impactful because of the lower % take. I think I said it was like 35% (again, I couldn't remember the exact %). I didn't dispute your 25% and I didn't comment further because it was the same point whether it was 35 or 25 or 15%...
 
I know you think you have full knowledge here.
Never wrote that, I have less knowledge about the entertainment industry now, since I retired last year, for about the 5th time.

Was even offered a job late last year, but it would have involved me moving to California, if I really cared that much, would have taken it, but at almost 58, finally said enough.

Have you watched any of the upfront presentations from companies this week so far? The information there is important.
Yep, can really see the decline for the Networks.

ABC-only 5 hours in Prime Time are new scripted Shows.
Fox-only 4 Hours are new scripted shows, 2 hours of that are cartoons on Sunday.
NBC-7 Hours are new scripted shows
CBS-13 hours and the winner
Warner-this is about the 4th time they have tried to restart things since Discovery took over.
 
Last edited:
Can you clarify what you mean on this?
Basically Food Network, HGTV, etc are going to cutback on new content, so if they have deals with certain production companies, hosts, etc, they will just let the deals expire.

That is what I was told, hence why I wrote rumors in that post, no more knowledge beyond that.

But it makes sense, since paid live TV has lost over 30 Million per sub fees, along with a expected 7 Million this year, next year probably about the same.

That is a lot of revenue lost, both in per sub fees and advertising revenue ( because of less people watching those cable channels).

Networks have already cut back new scripted content, makes sense for more Cable Channels to start cutting also.

That also means, since 2017, over 45 Million per sub fees lost by the end of 2026, estimated of course.
 
Also, just noticed this from the press release-

HBO Max®​ is the premier global streaming platform from Warner Bros. Discovery that delivers the most unique and captivating stories, ranging from the highest quality in scripted programming, movies, documentaries, true crime, adult animation, and live sports and news (where available). HBO Max is the destination for prestigious entertainment brands such as HBO, Warner Bros., Max Originals, DC, Harry Potter, A24 Films, as well as iconic shows like "Friends" and "The Big Bang Theory," all in one place.

No mention of Discovery as a brand.

Back to Discovery+ then?

No CNN or sports mentioned either.

I wonder if the price will go down then………of course, that is not a real question.

 
From Google's AI-

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, it's true that Discovery+ content will no longer be on HBO Max after the rebrand to HBO Max. Warner Bros. Discovery is reversing course and will be renaming the streaming service back to HBO Max, which is separate from Discovery+, according to multiple news sources. The move aims to refocus the platform around HBO's prestige programming and differentiate it from the broader offerings of Discovery+
 
From Google's AI-

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, it's true that Discovery+ content will no longer be on HBO Max after the rebrand to HBO Max. Warner Bros. Discovery is reversing course and will be renaming the streaming service back to HBO Max, which is separate from Discovery+, according to multiple news sources. The move aims to refocus the platform around HBO's prestige programming and differentiate it from the broader offerings of Discovery+
Not sure AI's source on this, but its not true. Although I hear the emphasis on Discovery content will decrease it will still be available. Also, sports is staying. Not sure if it is going to be on a different "tier" or not. Discovery+ never went away it just wasn't heavily promoted. It is also important to note that Max was built on the Discovery+ platform.
 
Top