MLB 2010 Season

Bottom line. It makes the game better!
Disagree....

The single worst thing that happened to the game was the DH. The next worst thing to happen is the unbalanced schedule of Interleague play. Both sacrificed the game for money. Pitchers become even worse hitters because they don't bat in the minors due to the DH. Some teams in the same division get an unfair advantage over others due to the fact that they get to play more games against weaker teams due to Interleague play.
 
Is there anyone who has the 2010 Interleague final record of the AL v. NL?
The American League posted a 134-118 record in Interleague Play, marking the seventh straight season in which the A.L. has won the season-series and extending its all-time Interleague lead to 1,808-1,652 (.523). A.L. Clubs posted six of the top seven Interleague records this season. The A.L. collected a .269 batting average with 1,168 runs scored, 233 home runs and a 4.16 ERA, compared to the N.L.'s .251 batting average, 1,098 runs scored, 242 home runs and 4.37 ERA.

The Chicago White Sox compiled a Major League-leading 2.76 ERA and finished with the top Interleague record at 15-3 (.833), followed by the Texas Rangers, who went 14-4 (.778), and then the Boston Red Sox and New York Mets, both of whom went 13-5 (722). Overall, A.L. West Clubs went 42-30 (.583) in Interleague Play, with three of its four Clubs playing over .500.

2010 Interleague average attendance up 17.8 percent over Intraleague | MLB.com: Official Info
 
Since 2003 the Red Sox are a MLB best 93-57 in interleague play.

Of course, that doesn't include 8-0 in World Series games. ;)
 
Al won 16 more games making an 8 game difference between the two
AL 134 to NL 118

Actually, there is no game difference between the two. Each league has played 252 games.

If the AL won 16 more games, wouldn't the NL be 16 GB ?

Yep. The term "Games Behind", as used in baseball standings, is defined as the number of games a team would have to play and defeat the first place team to be virtually tied with it, which is to say, to have the same, absolute won-loss differential.

NL is 16 games back. If the NL had won 8 more, they'd be tied.

Yes, but only because all eight of those games would have been against the AL, so the AL would have won eight fewer. It wouldn't ever work out that way if the competitive field was larger than two,