Still, the explanation/justification for the $100 charge for International movers doesn't make sense. What "re-use" of the reflector is one talking about? Those reflectors are left at the original residence, and to my personal numerous personal experiences, NEVER taken down by Dish for such phantom re-use. Hmm. Couldn't Dish have a tax write off for these lost pieces of equipment? Maybe? I suppose we won't go down that road as no one really has an answer for that. Still, it is probably cheaper for Dish just to leave the reflectors there, anyway, especially when they will charge $100 for International moves.
Sorry, but IMHO, and with no justification that makes sense to reality, Dish is hosing International subscribers for the $100 even though there may be a higher cost in the move for Dish for the replacement dual-band LNBF (heck, that expensive piece is also still left at the original residence under the mover program, is it not? I can tell you Dish left it there from the previous owner when my brother moved in). However, all the Internationals offered by Dish aren't necessarily offered by competitors, and so such a subscriber is faced with paying the $100 or doing without their Internationals: there just aren't any, perhaps only one, but mostly NONE, competitors to take their International business. Keep in mind International Channels and packages represent poor value when compared to standard packages. Meaning Internationals pay a higher rate for those channels and receiver fewer of them. They would seem to be paying there way like the rest of us--or in many cases, Internationals also subscribe to standard packages, so they are paying there way two times.
Now, for standard ubiquitous services, all the channels offered on AEP, for instance, there are competitors offering virtually the same channels and level of service and quality for those offended by a $100 charge to take their business: sat, cable, AT&T, Verizon, et al., even just getting a RoKu.
One solution could be for Dish to take down the original reflector and LNBF's to re-use at the new address of the mover. There would be a cost to send a tech for the 'UNinstall" but Dish would benefit financially by truly re-using this costly equipment. But me thinks Charlie wants the $100 cash much more, instead, because he can.
Finally, $100 is not chump change, especially when added to what is likely already a costly move, and any out of pocket expenses have a big impact. The amount of $100 for what is marketed as a Free Mover program (yes, cleverly leaving out the details by referring to "standard installation" when 99% of the customers couldn't tell you what that means) should not be dismissed When faced with that kind of "ding" people may attempt to save their family money and risk taking down the reflector and LNBF's themselves, an action one can't really fault. But if one is really concerned for one's personal safety, the company ought to do what it should and provide the free mover even for internationals with, perhaps, a few reasonable protections for Dish such as an International in good standing (no missed payments) length of subscription and level or type of International subscription (if it's only $6 per month subscription, Dish does have an argument for wanting the customer to make a fair investment for such a low level of International subscription). Weak justifications just affirm that Dish charges the $100 for Plus Internationals who move just because they can.