Take a Look MPEG 4 listings on 148

cebbigh

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
May 24, 2005
1,601
0
Frostbite Falls
I happen to have a Dish500 pointed at 148 that I was thinking of removing when I go to a Dish1000 (the channel I originally got the 148 for was moved to 119). The installer is scheduled for Tuesday. Do you think there a good reason now to keep a dish pointed at 148?
 

rad

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Cutting Edge
Sep 7, 2003
11,454
5,913
Dripping Springs, TX
OK, I'm confused. Didn't the tech chat say that E* wasn't going with MPEG4 since they didn't like the compression ratio's they were getting? From http://www.satelliteguys.us/showthread.php?t=111277&highlight=tech+chat )Tech Chat notes):

"MPEG4- No encoder in place yet to support(slower rollout than competition)
8PSK- Turbo allows 30 to 40 percent improvement in quailty, improve bandwidth for HD programming"


So E* is saying on thing and doing another (they wouldn't never do that would they? ;) )
 

CJPC

Pub Member / Supporter
Jun 27, 2004
501
0
.
They sadly may just be test channels... One because it seems E wants to move many people off 148 to 129, and second, didnt they show starz hd off 148 about a year ago (i remember there was a pic here on the site, using the 411 iirc)
 

mdonnelly

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Aug 26, 2004
8,161
2,940
Mustang, OK
Need to ask P.Smith about this. It doesn't seem to be new activity. It looks like he reported this to Lyngsat in September.
 

dfergie

Proud Staff Member
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
rad said:
OK, I'm confused. Didn't the tech chat say that E* wasn't going with MPEG4 since they didn't like the compression ratio's they were getting? From http://www.satelliteguys.us/showthread.php?t=111277&highlight=tech+chat )Tech Chat notes):

"MPEG4- No encoder in place yet to support(slower rollout than competition)
8PSK- Turbo allows 30 to 40 percent improvement in quailty, improve bandwidth for HD programming"
This all came word for word from the chat... I rewatched and paused where needed to take these down...
 

goaliebob99

SatelliteGuys Master
Supporting Founder
Aug 5, 2004
14,486
520
-.-. .... .. -.-. .- --. ---
guys this is just test channles that have been up forever.... the last I knew those channels are braudcasting Null packets... (no video content..) The safe bet right now would be to look to 129 and 61.5 for your new hd... and forget about mp4 for a while now... atleast untill the compression rate gets better.
 

mlb

SatelliteGuys Pro
Nov 22, 2005
1,027
0
Kettering, Ohio
I was told by E* CSR's last week that the MPEG4 was for their "interactive TV" programs. Using it for shopping would make sense to me. The SD and HDTV channels themselves would remain MPEG2 for the foreseeable future, is what I was told to expect.
 

BrianMis

Original PIT Dweller
Mar 29, 2005
5,898
2,903
Western PA
mlb said:
I was told by E* CSR's last week that the MPEG4 was for their "interactive TV" programs. Using it for shopping would make sense to me. The SD and HDTV channels themselves would remain MPEG2 for the foreseeable future, is what I was told to expect.

Please, Please take everything said by any CSR at E* with a grain of salt.

They have been wrong before. :rolleyes:
 

Paradox-SJ

SatelliteGuys Pro
Nov 20, 2003
1,636
2
San Jose, California
mlb said:
I was told by E* CSR's last week that the MPEG4 was for their "interactive TV" programs. Using it for shopping would make sense to me. The SD and HDTV channels themselves would remain MPEG2 for the foreseeable future, is what I was told to expect.

If a CSR's lips are moving they are probably lieing....
 

Tom Bombadil

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
May 5, 2005
3,601
1
Chicago-Milwaukee Region
I sure hope E* is testing MPEG4. In fact, they said they are testing it, and so far it isn't passing the mustard. So I wouldn't hold out much hope for picking up meaningful content from 148 in MPEG4 in the near term.

Anyway, it is highly unlikely that E* is going to offer unique, new channels in MPEG4 from 148. You test out on 148 and when it is ready, and you have a coordinated program to replace 8PSK receivers with MPEG4 receivers, then you go into production on the main birds. As there are plenty of existing HD channels to use for testing, there is no need to use new channels for testing.

My hope is that E* plans to put as much programming as possible on 110, 119, and 129, so that a D1000 is all that most of us need.
 

mlb

SatelliteGuys Pro
Nov 22, 2005
1,027
0
Kettering, Ohio
That isn't what I want to hear... I've trying to decide whether to become a new customer and lease a 942 or not... I don't want to pay the money and find out I should have waited for the 962 to be released.
 

Tom Bombadil

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
May 5, 2005
3,601
1
Chicago-Milwaukee Region
Given a choice, all of us would rather have a 962 (or whatever Dish calls their MPEG4 compatible DVR). However as no such beast presently exists, and there is no announced date for its introduction, we are all left with deciding to get a 942 now and start enjoying a very functional HD-DVR, or wait, wait, wait. That's the way it goes with computers, cell phones, iPods, HDTV sets, etc.
 

HokieEngineer

Proud Staff Member
Oct 13, 2003
2,289
0
As GoalieBob and others have said, these are just test channels which have been on 148 for awhile. They are reported on lyngsat as FTA though, so I'll have to swing a dish over there and see if anything is still being tested, unless P. Smith beats me to it ;)

There is one other h.264 channel, its on 129 on the test QPSK turbo transponder. Currently there is an mpeg2 channel mirroring one of the Voom channels, and a h.264 test channel reportedly showing the SD version of a NYC local.

Don't believe anything the CSRs say about mpeg4. They'll probably be the last to know.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)