What are the plans for AMC16 and E4?

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Dish has applied to the FCC to move AMC-16 to 118.7 W for use of Ku band. Dish has a lease agreement with TeleSat for the Anik F3 satellite at 118.7 W but that satellite won't be launched until the 3rd quarter of 2006 at the earliest. By the way, I believe a modified Superdish could be used to receive 110, 119, 118.7 (or 121) and 129. AMC-16 is suppose to go back to 85 W after the Anik F3 satellite is launched but Dish has licenses for Ka band at some other slots including 117 W and 113 W so Dish may want to request to have it moved to one of these locations. In addition, Dish has license to extended Ku band at 109 W and AMC-16 might be able to provide some extended Ku band similar to AMC-6 that SES Americom is trying to get FCC approval to use.

The E-4 satellite is at 77 W and Dish has applied to use it for the extreme southern part of the U.S. Remember E-4 is a very crippled satellite (cue the Sanford & Son theme music) and may only have 6 usable TPs.
 
ITK said:
How do they *move* satellites?
Most satellites have an onboard fuel supply and steering jets. It's not unusual to move a satellite from one azimuth to another. Obviously, the fuel supply is finite, and you can't do this very many times with the same satellite.
 
If they run out of fuel, then they have to use tractor beams from a nearby satellite. That uses up even more fuel.
 
Actually a European company with the backing of several others is developing spacecraft that would dock with a satellite and extend its life by providing a station-keeping propulsion module. I believe their goal is to extend the life of a typical communication satellite from 10 - 12 years to 15 - 20 years. Obviously you would only want to do this with a satellite that still has useful and working communication capabilities instead of ones with obsolete or non-functioning capabilities. In the last few years the reliability of communication satellites has increased substantially so this effort maybe worthwhile.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)