What happens now to E6?

jegrant

jegrant

SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 5, 2005
1,211
172
Maybe they could move it to 61.5?

E*3 is gasping for air, IMO.
 
C

CJPC

Pub Member / Supporter
Jun 27, 2004
501
0
.
Ya, but rainbow 1 is there as well, and its "new" (using that term loosley!)
 
digiblur

digiblur

SatelliteGuys Master
Jun 8, 2005
14,190
4
Louisiana
The more you move it around the sky the more fuel you use. Last time I checked there weren't any Exxon stations at geostationary orbit.
 
D

DeadBirdDog

Member
Apr 12, 2006
9
0
digiblur said:
Last time I checked there weren't any Exxon stations at geostationary orbit.


Well with their profits that may be about to change...
 
DSSJAKE

DSSJAKE

New Member
May 16, 2006
4
0
Planet Earth
Echo 6

ralfyguy said:
Are they gonna move E6 somewhere? Wouldn't it be good to move that to 129?

HI there.

This sat, and all retiring sats, will go to neverland, a place far,far away...
where old sats tell stories of better times and fart all day.

ECHO 6 farewell my friend, see ya sometime, somewhere, in this life or next...
 
ralfyguy

ralfyguy

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Sep 17, 2005
3,212
410
McAlester, Oklahoma
They're moving AMC-16 from 85 to 118 and is apparently not a big deal. So why not kick E6 from 110 to 129? E5 is pretty much at the end of it's life anyways. Some day it'll crap out eventually, and then they gonna have to move one after all.
 
mike123abc

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
24,238
3,124
Norman, OK
They probably want to make sure E10 is completely stable before they remove the backup. They really need E11 up with the steerable spots up to backup both E7 and E10.
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
1
Views
818
Mr Tony
M
T
Replies
6
Views
1K
bhelms
B
rvvaquero
Replies
23
Views
3K
Dishman1978
Dishman1978

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top