Wholesale cost of channels (1 Viewer)

Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

rharkins

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Guru
Mar 8, 2006
138
82
Kansas City, MO USA
Sorry if someone else posted this, but I didn't see it. Here's a table from SNL Kagan showing the wholesale price per subscriber for content. I'm sure this needs to be taken with a grain of salt since negotiation between provider and distributor needs to be taken into account

Here's the link to the original article:
What Cable Subscribers Pay for Channels They Don't Watch | Peter Kafka | MediaMemo | AllThingsD

Let the ala carte discussion continue! I just hate it that 40% of the charges relate to sports programming, and I just don't watch sports. If I added up the channels I do watch regularly, the wholesale cost would be $5 or so.

Rick
 

Attachments

  • 3-9-2010 2-23-31 PM.jpg
    3-9-2010 2-23-31 PM.jpg
    105.9 KB · Views: 486
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

CowboyDren

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jul 18, 2005
990
1
64133
Oh. My. Gosh. I hate channel bundling even MORE now. I spend a LOT of money for stuff I don't watch, and it's only reinforced here. Call me un-American or immasculine, but these sports channels are killing me, and I NEVER watch them. Ever.
 

satjay

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jun 30, 2005
12,644
808
Michigan
Has anyone put together what there package would cost if they turned back time and were able to package there own channels like Cband was. Intresting that the MLB network price was nothing to crazy
 

DodgerKing

SatelliteGuys Master
Nov 14, 2007
16,776
26
SoCal
Has anyone totaled this up to see what the total cost for everything would be?
It is not as difficult as you may think. Instead of adding each price separately, just take the average they listed at the end and multiply that by the total number of channels.

172 total channels and an average of .20 per channel makes a total of $34.40
 
Last edited:

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
23,708
2,414
Norman, OK
You only get EI if you paid a lot of money up front. Dish decided against it, DIRECTV and some cable companies decided to do it.
 
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

DodgerKing

SatelliteGuys Master
Nov 14, 2007
16,776
26
SoCal
From the article

You’ll find this particularly upsetting if you don’t watch sports. Because sports channels account for about 40 percent of cable fees.
A good point if sports was not that big of a deal for subs and not a big money maker for cable and DBS providers. I would be willing to bet that more than 40% of subs sign up for satellite or cable because of sports as their #1 reason and way more that 40% of subs watch sports on these channels at least part of the time.
 
Last edited:

DodgerKing

SatelliteGuys Master
Nov 14, 2007
16,776
26
SoCal
You only get EI if you paid a lot of money up front. Dish decided against it, DIRECTV and some cable companies decided to do it.
Exactly, which helps demonstrate my point.

The point being that MLB can charge less for MLBNet because of the fact that the companies that carry this channel also carry EI, something they pay a lot more for. So baseball ends up making money off of the other part of the carriage agreement linking the two.

Also the fact that MLBNet is less than a year old so nobody is going to pay a lot for something new and unknown.

If MLBNet ends up being successful and popular and/or it is no longer tied to EI, then you may see the price for it going up.
 

ryotgz

SatelliteGuys Pro
Dec 30, 2008
1,186
0
USA
Glad to see some of the more expensive packages you get for only one channel costs a few cents. But you have to have $5-$10 more for other crap channels.
 

Rob052067

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jan 7, 2009
161
4
Columbus, OH
The generic wholesale prices in this listing are, I assume, based on carriage by the provider on the most common tier where the cost of the channel is spread over all subscribers. In an ala carte world, each channel's cost would be spread among only the number of customers who choose to subscribe to each channel.

To make this easy to understand, say a channel costs $0.10 per customer when that cost is spread among all 100,000 customers of CableSatCoXYZ. But, if say only 10,000 customers choose to subscribe to that same channel in an ala carte world, it would be very likely that the cost for that channel would have to be $1.00 per customer.

In other words, if the average cost per channel is $0.10, and there are 100 channels in the most popular package, the cost of programming is $10.00 total for all 100 channels. But, if customers choose to receive only their 10 favorite channels, and the cost per channel rises to an average of $1.00 each, the total cost for only 10 channels would still be $10.00.

This is a very simplistic example, but it is simple economics. The cost per channel is kept lower in the current business model, and there would not likely be any savings to the consumer in an ala carte world.
 

merk

SatelliteGuys Family
Mar 8, 2010
49
0
Los Angeles, CA
according to that pricing, all the channels i watch would be under $5. I'm also one of the ones who never watches any of the sports channels.

personally, i'd rather have ala carte. let me pick what i want.
 
Register Today to see less ads! It's Free!

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top