I'd be anxious to know how much people are paying, though? Everyone seems so quick to jump ship based on programming, but is anyone looking at the difference in price?
For me it's a no-brainer. To get exactly what I'm getting with E* from D* (including the channels, fees, & receivers) I would actually be spending $25/month more...and that's a BIG deal. To go to Comcast the difference is an astounding $30-$35 more per month!
Is losing VOOM that important that you'd be willing to pay more?
And lost about 300 hours per day of actual HD content.So, instead of adding 22 channels, Dish has a net add of 5 nationals and 2 RSNs. ...
So, instead of adding 22 channels, Dish has a net add of 5 nationals and 2 RSNs. Morons.
Bottom line for me is Dish is noe in the red with me in the HD department the took channels I watched and replaced them with channels I do not watch. I am stuck with a contract till the end of the year , but instead of staying at the end of the contract, I will go looking for a better deal if it is out there. Before you Dish loyalist attack, let me say I will not leave if a better deal or channel package is not out there. My point is the way they do run their operation has made me think about leaving. If you did right by me I would not leave. I get a discount on service and I am still thinking of leaving, what does that say about Dish! It is more about the way they treat the consumer. I know this had nothing to do with what channels were "popular " and everything to do with lawsuits. Yet they assume I am too stupid to see their lies. Why put up with this kind of treatment if you have a choice. They claim Voom breached htier contract, In my eyes Dish breached theirs with ME. In a nut shell they lost a loyal customer, now I am just a customer.
Said it before and I'll say it again..Adding some Nat'l channels is cool, I guess, but it's NOT HD..NOT HD...NOT HD...NOT HD...NOT HD...NOT HD. VOOM WAS HD-repeats or not, it WAS HD. I didn't buy a HDTV for SD content!!!!!! I would've stuck with my Sony Trinitron for SD..If I hear one more person say: "But look at all the other HD channels we got in place of VOOM!" THERE ARE NONE (ok, maybe 3 or so) 3<15=we got screwed for HD. If they did some sort of poll that resulted in people saying they'd prefer Nat'l HD channels, it's either b/c: A. they thought they would be in true HD or B.they have no freakin' clue what HD is..It's simple; 90% of the new channels are NOT in HD!!!!!!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH! (stabbing myself with a broken pencil in my eye)
I concur..but as I said before why did the "non-geek-masses" even bother with an HDTV? For maybe 10-15 HD channels? Maybe when "the masses" realize they're watching "glorified SD" (so it's in 5.1-whoop-di-do) they'll miss the "TRUE" HD content..Man, I'm a " " machine..The problem is that the general populace is not filled with the HD-geeks like you and me. In the end E* has to try and get subscribers and we are definitely living in an age where "brand recognition" rules. I really think the DirecTV ads about the "Channels you've never heard of" hurt E* more than we know. I blame this more on the "masses" and VOOM than anything else. Although, I blame E* for the poor way they handled the removal.
I concur..but as I said before why did the "non-geek-masses" even bother with an HDTV? For maybe 10-15 HD channels? Maybe when "the masses" realize they're watching "glorified SD" (so it's in 5.1-whoop-di-do) they'll miss the "TRUE" HD content..Man, I'm a " " machine..
Honestly the masses we're talking about bought those HDTV's for their network programming. All they really care about seeing in HD is Lost, CSI, E/R, etc. and their regional NFL games on Sunday.
There are those who care about some of the pay channels in HD, but again it's strictly to watch the popular shows in HD. Branching out to find an eye-popping experience is not #1 on their agenda.
Man, spending a couple grand to watch 3 or 4 shows in HD..I'm in the wrong profession..I wish they'd buy me a Rolls-Royce to just drive around on Sunday...Honestly the masses we're talking about bought those HDTV's for their network programming. All they really care about seeing in HD is Lost, CSI, E/R, etc. and their regional NFL games on Sunday.
There are those who care about some of the pay channels in HD, but again it's strictly to watch the popular shows in HD. Branching out to find an eye-popping experience is not #1 on their agenda.
The #1 reason I thought anybody bought an HDTV was to watch HDTV...NOT SD!!!!!!!!!! I don't know anyone who bought an HDTV just for sports. This still doesn't explain the desire for people to demand these Nat'l channels in SD over any other channels in HD..We (masses) already had ABC Family, Disney, etc. So what, now it's in 5.1...........IT'S STILL SD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Isn't that the ultimate debate here? Losing HD for SD??? (and the way it was handled, I guess)The number 1 reason among people I know for buying an HDTV is to get sports in HD.
Don't know how long they will be there though, if they lost Dish, and only send to Expressvu and Optimum, how long can they go on?