Satellite chart !!!PIC!!!

[nelson61]

I'm aware of Horizons 2 but I need some sort of proof of the other birds you mentioned. I will gladly make the changes if they are necessary.

I like the new Satbeams Beta. You can drill down to lots of details for each satellite.

SatBeams - Home

 

[phlatwound]

I like the new Satbeams Beta. You can drill down to lots of details for each satellite.

SatBeams - Home

Very nice site, thanks.

 

[gertnerbot]

Your chart suggests otherwise



May I be so bold to ask what constitutes proof? The changes suggested seem to be general knowledge.

And, one concern: I might be stupid here, but, I am having trouble figuring out the vertical scale. Is there any meaning? It sort of looks like three levels, small satellites at the top, mixed in the middle, and large satellites at the bottom.. but I find no common attributes among the satellites depicted in those levels. Perhaps it was a matter of convenience in creating the picture?

There isn't any meaning to the vertical scale. Mainly I put the more "important" birds as the biggest and the less important as the smallest. But the reason that they are different sizes is to accommodate all of the satellites on to one chart.

 

[gertnerbot]

I've posted the +100 degrees chart!

Picasa Web Albums - gertnerbot - Satellite

 

[gertnerbot]

Satellite Chart 2 !!!PIC!!!

Here is the chart that includes 101 to 148 degrees. Please tell me of any changes or modifications that I need to make.

Picasa Web Albums - gertnerbot - Satellite

 

[Mr Tony]

129 isnt Echo 5....thats at 148 right now
Ciel II is at 129 for DBS
Echo 2 is dead...blew up a year or so ago
Echo 1 is on the move right now to 77 or 72ish I forget

 

[gertnerbot]

129 isnt Echo 5....thats at 148 right now
Ciel II is at 129 for DBS
Echo 2 is dead...blew up a year or so ago
Echo 1 is on the move right now to 77 or 72ish I forget

Would you happen to know which frequency those run on (Ku, C or Both)?

 

[Mr Tony]

all are DBS (so techncally KU)

Dish only has one KU linear satellite and that is at 121...all the rest are circular polarity

 

[ACRadio]

At 110W...KU DBS...
Echostar 10
Echostar 11

Add AMC 4 to AMC 2 at 101W
Satmex 6 should be blue in color
AMC 18 should be red in color

Maybe do 2 entries for 129W since Galaxy 27 and Ciel II are 2 seperate sats...G27 has C and KU payloads...and possibly the same with 125W where Galaxy 14 (C) and AMC21 (KU) are 2 seperate birds...similar to what you did at 105W...

 

[guapoharry]

Would you happen to know which frequency those run on (Ku, C or Both)?

Dude, why don't you try putting the info in the following post to some use?

http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/180076-satellite-chart-pic.html#post1878369

List of satellites by orbital location and links to transponder lists

While technically correct, putting two birds at the same orbital location will complicate the visual design. IMHO.

 

[gertnerbot]

Dude, why don't you try putting the info in the following post to some use?

http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/180076-satellite-chart-pic.html#post1878369

List of satellites by orbital location and links to transponder lists

While technically correct, putting two birds at the same orbital location will complicate the visual design. IMHO.

Well it's just a simple chart and if you don't like my chart, make your own. And furthermore, several different satellite lists show different things and obviously known of them show the same thing. So in short, get it over it ok.

 

[xxtornxx]

here's another chart' if the dl worked and if you you can zoom in. iI have it adobe reader and can zoom and read each sat.

 

[Smith P.]

here's another chart' if the dl worked and if you you can zoom in. iI have it adobe reader and can zoom and read each sat.

See post #5 (Dec 2008), your is obsolete now (2006).

 

[gertnerbot]

So do you now see the trouble I'm having. I've been shown 4 different charts and I'm unsure which ones are out of date and which ones are good.

 

[B.J.]

So do you now see the trouble I'm having. I've been shown 4 different charts and I'm unsure which ones are out of date and which ones are good.

None of the charts are 100% accurate, even with respect to what sats are active on what bands. I know of one CONUS satellite which is not shown correctly, with respect to what bands it has, on ANY of the popular satellite charts. Lyngsat is probably the most accurate chart out there. Personally, while I admire the effort, I think trying to make a chart to compete with Lyngsat is re-inventing the wheel and starting by making it square.

 

[gertnerbot]

None of the charts are 100% accurate, even with respect to what sats are active on what bands. I know of one CONUS satellite which is not shown correctly, with respect to what bands it has, on ANY of the popular satellite charts. Lyngsat is probably the most accurate chart out there. Personally, while I admire the effort, I think trying to make a chart to compete with Lyngsat is re-inventing the wheel and starting by making it square.

Well my whole purpose for doing this is not to show exactly what each bird does or their signal or distance from the earth or their orbital pattern or blah blah blah. I made the chart so when, even using a Birdog, you can look at the chart to see, "Oh ok, I need to go two birds to the left or right to find the one that I need!" That's all the chart is for; it's intended purpose is not to specifically state how many licks it takes to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop but rather to give you an idea of where each bird is.

 

[PKII]

please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't your chart backwards?
Brasilsat at 65 W would be over Brazil, not over Alaska.
Maybe I'm not looking at it properly. If that's the case, just ignore me ;-)

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/launch/980031_001.pdf

Hmm. I think we need a few more satellites up there.

 

[guapoharry]

please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't your chart backwards?
Brasilsat at 65 W would be over Brazil, not over Alaska.
Maybe I'm not looking at it properly. If that's the case, just ignore me ;-)

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/launch/980031_001.pdf

Hey, THANKS for posting that link.

That PDF really looks cool when printed on a large format printer...:up

 

[mikelib]

Hey, THANKS for posting that link.

That PDF really looks cool when printed on a large format printer...:up

Harry,
I have been trying to make that PDF into a poster to hang in the garage. I have not been very successful, when I make it larger it loses it's resolution and the font looks dull. How big is your printed copy?
Mike Lib

 

[guapoharry]

I printed out two. One is 18"x24". The other is 24"x36"

For comparison, they are pictured along with a used Pansat2500A bought for $23 shipped...