Social Feed

Main Feed My Feed
I
Iceman
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Can anyone answer this?? Dish CSRs can't

I was looking on Dish Network's website at the channel package lineup. It shows that Comcast Sports is in the AT120 package. It is channel 424. Funny, I press 424 and nothing happens. I call Dish and ask them why. A CSR by the name of Abe, tells me he is "fixing the situation" and ask me to power off my receiver and wait 15 minutes, power back on and it should be there.
Just for laughs and giggles I do as instructed, and just as I thought, still no 424.
I called back and spoke to a Chris, who tells me they don't have Comcast Sports, they are a cable company....I called Dish Network. I then begin to lose my temper due to the fact this jackass doesn't even know what channels that the company who pays his check carries.
I instruct him to look on the website. He places me on hold for a couple of minutes comes back and says "Oh, I see it now", but you can't get it; you don't qualify for it. I am pissed. He said I don't live in the area to receive it. I totally lose it. I asked him what channel is he going to put in it's place since that is part of the 120 channels they advertise that I will get. He sits in silence with no answer. I hang up and call back.
I get Mary. Mary tells me I don't qualify for it due to my address, even though Comcast cable company does have it for my area as well as Directv with no qualifications. This is the kicker. She says if I pay $5 more, I can get with the FOX Sports regional network package. ?????????? Either I qualify or I don't. Why would $5 more a month qualify my address??? Just another way to steal $5 a month from me I guess.
Wow... Three different CSRs, three different answers...

PATHETIC

Does anyone out there know for sure?
Read more
7 Replies · 2476 views
Load Replies (7) Reply Legacy View
G
Greg Bimson
Yes, it is a classic case of CSR roulette. However...

The OP is in Georgia. Getting Comcast Sports Net will get everything but the professional sports. Of course, Comcast Sports Net is the Mid-Atlantic version, that carries the Orioles, Wizards, Capitals, and Mystics. This is not the Comcast Sports Net from Philadelphia.

The worst part is that the only way a Georgian can get CSN Mid-Atlantic is to subscribe to the Sports Pack. That is an extra $5 a month.
Read more
Reply
I
Iceman
mike123abc said:
Here is what each CSR was trying to do:


2. They use an address broker that gives the regional sports channel based on your address. Dish/DIRECTV use slightly different ones, but unless you are right on the dividing line they should be the same.


3. Well the last one was trying to sell you the out of market regional sports package. This would give you all the regional sports packages from around the country, but they do black out all the Pro Sports games if you are not in their market.
Click to expand...

Here's where I get confused. Though Comcast Sports is based out of the Washington area, it is a National channel, like ESPN, except of course, blackouts do apply; Just like when I am watching the Braves on my local Fox, if I try to watch it on ESPN or FOX Sports South, It's blacked out because my local carrier gets the nod.
My two local cable providers, Comcast and Charter, both offer Comcast Sports channel in their expanded package with no kind of address qualification. Directv also carries this station with no address qualification.

What the hell does my address have to do with Comcast Sports for Dish Network when THREE other cable/satellite providers offer this channel without qualifications?

The way Dish Network's package is suppose to work is you get every channel listed in that sports category except ALL of the Fox Sports Networks. You get ONE Fox Sports Net channel; the one that is in your region of course. If you want the other Fox Sports Net channels, you have to pay the $5 to get the Fox Multi-Sports Package.

Oh.... I forgot to include in the original post the best excuse I heard. I was told that in the Sports category, I only get ONE sports channel. I asked "do you mean one Fox Sports Network?" They said, "No, one channel sir. Look at the #2 footnote on the website. It says you may receive one sports network." I told them that means one FOX sports network, not one damn channel out of that whole package. They continued to argue with me. So I asked if I get ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNEWS, ESPN Classic, Turner South??? They said "Yes." I said, "That's five channels in that package. You just told me I only get ONE. Get your story straight." They put me on forever hold to discuss this with their supervisor. The supervisor got involved in the call and informed me that they will be discussing this matter further and I would get a call back shortly.

No call yet.

This whole company is going down hill fast.

Do you have the 120 or more package? What channel is Dish Network going to substitute your Comcast Sports channel for, or are they going to continue to charge you for a channel they advertise as part of the 120, 180,etc.????
Read more
Reply
U
utexex79
the footnote says 'Receive one Regional Sports Network only', the key word here being Regional. From what I understand, this includes Fox, NESN, MSG, Sunshine, Empire and Comcast. you receive all of the ESPN channels as they are considered 'national'. In my case, I receive FSSW. I do not get Turner South, which is "available in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, South Carolina and regions of North Carolina".

why the CSR couldn't explain this to you is another matter alltogether...
Read more
Reply
TNGTony
TNGTony
Iceman, Long post, please read it all the way through before responding.

This is a classic case of lousy customer service (not explaining the situation properly) and complete customer misunderstanding of the situation.

The footnote (which is at the top of all the web pages in question) is the following
* Please note: If you subscribe to America's Top 120 you will receive the regional sports network(s) determined by your geographical location. Click Here for sports blackout information.
Click to expand...

It does not say "Fox Sports Networks". That may be what you understood it meant, it it is not what it says! The confusion starts off with all the sports networks (regional and national) being listed in aphabetical order. This puts Comcast first in the list of sports channels right above ESPN.

The REGIONAL sports networks have specific REGIONS they serve. You are entitled to one, two or even three REGIONAL sports networks as part of AT60 PLUS and higher packages.

The REGIONAL sports networks that are available to you depend 100% on where you live.

Most REGIONAL sports channels are "Fox Sports Net" branded channels, but not all.

-Com-Cast mid-atlantic used to be called Home Team Sports.
-Florida has the Sunshine Network.
-Upstate New York has Empire Sports.
-NYC has "Madison Square Garden Net." and Yankees Entertainment & Sports" channel (Not available on Dish).
-New England has NESN.
-Philadelphia has Comcast Sports Philadelphia (only available on cable because that is the way the channel owners want it)

Comcast Sports Mid atlantic serves Baltimore/Washington down to eastern North Carolina. That is their REGION.

Example...you get Turner South as part of your REGIONAL sports networks as part of AT60+. I cannot, under any circumstances even if my name is Ted Turner, get that channel in Ohio legally. Why? Because of the programming contracts the CHANNEL (not Dish Network) has. By the same token, I get Fox Sports Ohio (used to be Sportschannel Cincinnati) and you don't.

Here is the list of the RSNs on Dish:

Fox Sports West 2 FSW2 (LA area subs only) Not available on OOM Package
MSG - Madison Square Garden Network MSG
Fox Sports New York FOXNY
Fox Sports Rocky Mountain FOXRM
Fox Sports Arizona FOXAZ
Fox Sports Southwest FOXSW
Fox Sports West FOXW
Fox Sports Midwest FOXMW
Fox Sports Bay Area FOXBA
Fox Sports South FOXS
Fox Sports Chicago FOXCH
Sunshine Network SUN
Fox Sports Florida FOXFL rts
Comcast Sports Network-Mid Atlantic (HTS) CCSN
Fox Sports Ohio(Cleveland/State Wide) FOXOH
Fox Sports Northwest FOXNW
Fox Sports Ohio(Cincinnati) FOXCN
Fox Sports Pittsburgh FOXPT
Fox Sports Detroit FOXD
Empire Sports Network EMP
New England Sports Network NESN
Fox Sports New England FOXNE
Fox Sports North (MN) (WI on FS Alt2-446) FOXN DL2* Sports
Turner South (available ONLY in MS, AL, TN, GA, SC and Western NC)


And now to confuse things a little more: many of these channels have several different feeds. Dish only carries the main ones except on an as-needed basis to get all the pro sports. That is when the Alternates are activated. If the game is supposed to be available to you in your area. The alternate channel will be made available to you (445-450 range) for the duration of the event.

Some of these feeds are available in areas that may seem strange. For example, Fox Sports Ohio has 6, count them 6 feeds. Most of the time they are the same. But one of the feeds is specifically for cable systems in central and Eastern Kentucky and Indiana outside the Cincinnati Reds area. One is specifically for Central Ohio and, is specifically for West Virginia. One is specifically for the Cleveland (NE and Eastern Ohio) and one is for the Cincinnati area. Dish carries two of the 6 channels. These are the two main feeds. The two feeds with all the major league sports. People in Cincinnati cannot get the Cleveland channel and vice-versa. However, people in south-central Ohio can get both! Why? Because the RSNs want it that way.

So that is the long way of saying that the Comcast sports channel on cable in your area may not be the same as the channel on Dish or DirecTV.

Another point of confusion: DirecTV includes the RSN Out-of-Market package (No pro sports for the most part) in some of their basic packages. Dish does not. At the same time many of, Dish packages are cheaper by a few, which happens to be the cost of the RSN out-of-market package on Dish.
(Before people jump my case here and start arguing price, the point was not to start a price comparison argument. It's just another illustration which is usually correct but not always depending on the packages.)

Another completely unrelated thought here: It takes 24-48 hours from the time your receiver is activated to the time you can see your regional sports network. Why? Because the RSNs work backwards. The receiver assumes you DO NOT qualify to get the channel until it gets a specific authorization code that comes from a different source. Why? Because that is the way the RSNs want it!

See ya
Tony
Read more
Reply
C
Chris Freeland
In addition to what TNGTony said above, the Comcast Sports Net that you are referring too that are on your local cable company is actually Comcast/Charter Sports SE and you are a little mistaken because neither E* nor D* caries this channel. Their are no pro sports on CSE, mostly TN and some GA college sports on it if I am not mistaken. I live in nearby TN and qualify for the same channels as I believe that you do, Fox Sport South and Turner South. CSE is exclusively on Comcast and Charter cable.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (7)
JSheridan
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

All DMA's now Western Arc

I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
Read more
156 Replies · 4327 views
Load Replies (156) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: That American Girl, MikeD-C05, AkaDoubleG and 6 others
Foxbat
Foxbat
Unless Dish acquires DirecTV and its mid-USA satellite slots, I may not have Dish Network to reach 40 years. Or, I guess we could buy a new house…
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
Foxbat said:
Unless Dish acquires DirecTV and its mid-USA satellite slots, I may not have Dish Network to reach 40 years. Or, I guess we could buy a new house…
Click to expand...
have charlie buy you a new house :biggrin :clapping
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
T
telstar_1
Well, I didn't immediately think of broadcast, where there are all kinds of digital "subchannels"- I remember back when digital broadcast began that supposedly the 6mhz channel would likely support just 1 HD program and that the added subchannels would likely have to remain SD. I don't watch enough broadcast to know. Are there a lot of the subchannels in SD-only, and how do they do that, like are they in 4:3 or some kind of low-res widescreen?
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Foxbat
slow_poke_pete said:
have charlie buy you a new house :biggrin :clapping
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, I don't think my social proximity to Charle Ergen provides any special perks. Maybe if Foxbat, Jr. were to marry his daughter…🤞🏻🤣
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: Bobby, slow_poke_pete and charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
Foxbat said:
Unfortunately, I don't think my social proximity to Charle Ergen provides any special perks. Maybe if Foxbat, Jr. were to marry his daughter…🤞🏻🤣
Click to expand...
that would be one hell of a convo :biggrin.
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: charlesrshell
osu1991
osu1991
telstar_1 said:
Well, I didn't immediately think of broadcast, where there are all kinds of digital "subchannels"- I remember back when digital broadcast began that supposedly the 6mhz channel would likely support just 1 HD program and that the added subchannels would likely have to remain SD. I don't watch enough broadcast to know. Are there a lot of the subchannels in SD-only, and how do they do that, like are they in 4:3 or some kind of low-res widescreen?
Click to expand...
New more efficient encoders. I think there's around 60 channels/sub channels now in the Tulsa dma. 480 widescreen for most of the sub channels, but some have 2 HD channels and a couple of SD sub channels while others have 1 HD and 5 or more SD sub channels. If they moved to mp4 or hevc encoding they could do higher bitrates for SD or more HD or even 4K in that 6Mhz channel. That could render some early digital tvs unable to tune though as they may not have the codecs for that. Considering 4K tvs have been on sale for years, I think it would be a very small minority of TVs with the problem. I'd rather see that happen and keep ATSC 1 than continue the move to a DRM enforced ATSC 3 world.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
View all replies (156)
S
SatZach
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Is Roku the new Legacy Cable?

The title was to catch everyone's eye lol! But it is a thought I've been having as I dev a Roku app for a client. You see many MAAANY years ago I got really interested in cable TV channels and even chatted with a regional carrier, Insight about what it took to get a channel number. It was surprisingly easy although prohibitively expensive.



You could petition, reserve a high channel number, they monitored performance and if they liked you, you'd get lower channel number overtime and cut into ad overlays.



Roku has a similar setup. Make an app, if it has a strong, original linear component you could get channel assignment on The Roku Channel.



As mixed as my feelings are on the current media landscape, I can't help but feel a little excited interest when I scope out the apps in the Roku store.
Read more
2 Replies · 46 views
Load Replies (2) Reply Legacy View
navychop
navychop
Hmmm. I think Roku will last. But will Firestick? With their backing, I guess so. Apple TV STB? Of Course. Walmart? Seems someone ought to go, but with their backing?….

Off brands have, as probably expected, very short lives.
Read more
Reply
S
SatZach
navychop said:
Hmmm. I think Roku will last. But will Firestick? With their backing, I guess so. Apple TV STB? Of Course. Walmart? Seems someone ought to go, but with their backing?….

Off brands have, as probably expected, very short lives.
Click to expand...
All of those services have FAST Channels. FAST is a linear online broadcast stndrd. You notice how their linear channels all have some overlap? They are gettting paid for every second those streams are up without really having to do their own accounting. Best part is they don't even facilitate any of the stream bandwidth. Over glorified app stores on some android hardware. No reason NOT to stay in the game.
Read more
Reply
K
klang
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy - Paramount+

Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.
Read more
94 Replies · 3717 views
Load Replies (94) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05, TheKrell and Foxbat
harshness
harshness
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
harshness said:
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.
Click to expand...
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
long_time_Dish said:
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...
Click to expand...
Me either ...
They turned out to be a Poor adversary ....
Read more
Reply
Foxbat
Foxbat
They got their proper due on "Deep Space Nine"
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
Foxbat said:
They got their proper due on "Deep Space Nine"
Click to expand...
And too many episodes centering on/around them as well...
Read more
Reply
View all replies (94)
SuperDish_Fan23
SuperDish_Fan23
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Its crazy how the ViP922 is so rare for no reason.

Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!
Read more
35 Replies · 1106 views
Load Replies (35) Reply Legacy View
S
Strega
I looked for wrecked trains on ebay and those are hard to find too!
Read more
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: AZ., dishdude and charlesrshell
Almighty1
Almighty1
I remember this in the news too...

www.nbcnews.com

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

A widow rented a rotary dial telephone for 42 years, paying what her family calculates as more than $14,000 for a now- outdated phone.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and charlesrshell
Bobby
Bobby
Almighty1 said:
I remember this in the news too...

www.nbcnews.com

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

A widow rented a rotary dial telephone for 42 years, paying what her family calculates as more than $14,000 for a now- outdated phone.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
Click to expand...
That is a misnomer. In the old days you subscribed to telephone service. That included the telephone line and one telephone. An extension cost $1 a month extra. So that $14,000 over 42 years was for the service not the leased telephone. There is no way they paid $28 a month for 42 years for a leased telephone.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05, charlesrshell, AZ. and 2 others
SuperDish_Fan23
SuperDish_Fan23
SuperDish_Fan23 said:
Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!
Click to expand...
Whoever still has their 922, please let me know i just wanna see photos of the ui and other stuff
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
SuperDish_Fan23 said:
Whoever still has their 922, please let me know i just wanna see photos of the ui and other stuff
Click to expand...

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wL6dsORmXg
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: SuperDish_Fan23 and charlesrshell
T
telstar_1
Slicker guides never did much for me
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
Almighty1
Bobby said:
That is a misnomer. In the old days you subscribed to telephone service. That included the telephone line and one telephone. An extension cost $1 a month extra. So that $14,000 over 42 years was for the service not the leased telephone. There is no way they paid $28 a month for 42 years for a leased telephone.
Click to expand...
Good point as part of that time mentioned was before I was even alive.

While reports from the family's case focused entirely on the equipment rental charges, media records show that Ester Strogen originally started by paying $29.95 per quarter ($9.98 per month) in the 1960s for her combined telephone connection.
The actual base cost for standard residential telephone service over a 42-year period (spanning roughly 1964 to 2006) reveals how basic connection costs evolved compared to the equipment rental fees:

Historical Phone Service Rates
  • 1960s – 1970s Base Rate: Standard local phone service was heavily subsidized and tightly regulated under the Bell System monopoly. A basic landline package with unlimited local calling typically cost between $5.00 and $10.00 per month.
  • 1980s – 2000s Post-Deregulation Rate: Following the AT&T divestiture in 1984, base line service rates steadily climbed due to the introduction of subscriber line charges, touch-tone fees, and local infrastructure adjustments. By 2006, basic flat-rate local residential phone service hovered around $15.00 to $25.00 per month (excluding long-distance packages and taxes).
The True Lifetime Service Bill

Assuming an average baseline connection fee of roughly $12.00 a month over that 42-year span, the line connectivity itself would have realistically accumulated to approximately $6,000 in raw cash payouts.
When you bundle the actual service costs together with the escalating equipment rental fees, the total cumulative out-of-pocket phone expenses over those four decades easily crossed $12,000 to $14,000. Long-distance phone calls—which were billed entirely by the minute back then and could cost up to 15 to 30 cents per minute—would add significantly more to that historical total depending on usage.

The widely publicized calculation stems from a viral news story from 2006 involving a widow named Ester Strogen. Her family discovered she had been continuously leasing two rotary dial telephones from AT&T for 42 years.
The total cost—which actually came out to more than $14,000 by the time the lease was canceled—was calculated based on the following legacy telecom structure:
  • The Monthly Fee: At the time her granddaughters discovered the charges, the ongoing leasing fee was $29.10 per month for the two outdated phones.
  • The Math: Over 42 years (504 months), paying roughly $24 to $30 a month accumulates to between $12,000 and $14,600 ($29.10 × 504 months = $14,666.40).
Why did this happen?
Prior to the landmark breakup of AT&T ("Ma Bell") in 1984, consumers were legally not allowed to own their phones; they were required to lease them directly from the phone company.
When the laws changed and phone ownership became legal, AT&T spun off its rental division into a company called QLT Consumer Lease Services. Millions of customers, particularly elderly individuals who were used to seeing a single unified phone bill, simply never realized that the small recurring "equipment lease" line-item could be canceled by buying a cheap phone at a retail store.

Yes, leasing absolutely cost that much in reality, and the math is entirely accurate. However, the calculations performed by the family did contain one major historical nuance: they multiplied the final 2006 rate across all 42 years, which means the actual total cash paid out was likely a bit lower.
The original viral story focused on 82-year-old widow Ester Strogen from Canton, Ohio, who paid $29.10 a month for two black rotary phones until her family intervened in July 2006.
The reality behind how the cost reached that staggering total breaks down into two distinct phases:

Phase 1: The Historical Base Rate (1960s – 1984)

When Strogen first got the phones in the 1960s, renting was a legal mandate and cost a fraction of the 2006 price—usually just a few dollars a month.
  • The "Insurance" Mirage: In exchange for that fee, Ma Bell promised free, lifetime maintenance. If the phone broke, they replaced it instantly at no extra cost.
  • The Cost-Plus Reality: Because these solid-state phones were built like tanks out of heavy plastic and steel, they almost never broke. Consumers paid a continuous premium for decades for a repair service they rarely used.
Phase 2: The Deregulation Rate Hikes (1984 – 2006)

After AT&T was forced to break up its monopoly in 1984, the rental side of the business was shifted to Lucent Technologies and later a legacy holding company. To maximize profit off a shrinking customer base, they steadily increased the monthly rental fees over the next 20 years.
  • By 2006, the rental cost had quietly ballooned to roughly $14.55 per phone per month.
  • When the family discovered the $29.10 monthly charge, they looked back at the 42-year span and estimated the collective loss at over $14,000.
Even adjusted for historical inflation—where $2 a month in 1964 had the purchasing power of roughly $20 today—Ester Strogen and hundreds of thousands of other elderly Americans realistically paid thousands of dollars out-of-pocket for standard desk phones they could have purchased at retail for $10.

The exact out-of-pocket dollar amount Ester Strogen paid over those 42 years was never publicly determined, as neither AT&T nor the family had access to monthly billing records stretching all the way back to the 1960s.
The figures reported in the media are entirely mathematical estimates based on the 2006 rate. The two primary numbers used to define the "cost" are:
  • The Stated Media Total: More than $14,000.
  • The Exact Family Formula: $14,666.40. This was derived by taking her final recorded bill of $29.10 per month and multiplying it across the full 42 years (504 months).
What the True Cash Cost Likely Was

Because AT&T did not charge $29.10 a month back in 1964, the true historical cash sum she handed over was lower than $14,000. In the 1960s and 1970s, basic phone lease fees were generally bundled into standard service or itemized at just $1.00 to $2.00 a month per phone.
If we realistically assume she paid lower base rates for the first 20 years before the post-1984 deregulation price hikes took effect, a realistic estimate of the actual cash paid is between $5,000 and $7,000.

The Real Cost When Adjusted for Inflation

While the family's $14,000 calculation overestimates the raw cash paid, it actually underestimates the true economic damage when factoring in the time value of money.
Paying $2.00 a month for equipment in 1964 sounds minor, but due to severe inflation during the 1970s, those early single dollars had the purchasing power of roughly $20.00 each in 2006 terms. If you adjust every historical lower monthly payment upward to account for inflation, Ester Strogen realistically lost the equivalent of well over $15,000 in modern purchasing power by renting instead of buying.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
telstar_1 said:
Slicker guides never did much for me
Click to expand...
me either. sometimes it seems like things disappear when they start changing sh*t around :biggrin
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
Strega said:
I looked for wrecked trains on ebay and those are hard to find too!
Click to expand...
you would be better off looking in ca for a train wreck to nowhere :biggrin :p
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
View all replies (35)
jcrandall
jcrandall
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum

Channels on DIRECTV Satellite and not on Stream/Internet

So...DirecTV advertises the Choice package with 95+ bonus channels for Satellite customers. You don't want 90+ of the 95...

Excluding PPV, premium networks, infomercial, shopping, religion, and non-English programming, there are 7 channels on satellite that are not on streaming:
NFL Network, MavTV, FE TV, Free Speech, NASA, INSP, and Pursuit. I'm pretty sure a couple of those are public interest that they have to carry to meet an FCC quota on satellite.

I hope they get called out for this advertising because that is ridiculous. One big network, NFL, will probably get added to streaming when their next agreement comes up, and the rest are likely very low viewership.

What about streaming, what do you get extra with the Choice package that isn't on Satellite:
Two stations - one of which is an internet TV - Fox Weather, and Heros & Icons (a diginet). Nothing special here to look at either.

If they cleaned up a couple of their agreements, added a few public interest stations to streaming, they could probably have their lineups match. It's close now, if you take out all the garbage on satellite that they earn money on. If they can sell infomercials on satellite, why can't they on streaming, seems like a miss. A bigger miss, including those stations in the "bonus channels just for satellite customers." Pretty sad marketing right there.

1681344805401.png


Attached is a comparison sheet of satellite vs streaming for the three main packages if anyone is interested.

MOD EDIT: See Post #3 for an up to date list of what channels are available on sat but not on streaming/internet, see Post #21 for an up to date list of what's available in the app for streaming customers, but not for sat customers.
Read more
DirecTV Sat vs Stream.pdf 46 KB
243 Replies · 31875 views
Load Replies (243) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: DS0816, Tecnicoloco and Jimbo
K
KyL416
WNPX/28 Nashville (The new home of the Predators) and WMYD/20 Detroit (the new home of the Pistons) are testing on the stream server.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: darren_s, mario315, Former member 209992 and 2 others
harshness
harshness
One might get the impression that what DIRECTV does, or doesn't, is becoming far less consequential than it used to be.
Read more
Reply
M
mario315
harshness said:
One might get the impression that what DIRECTV does, or doesn't, is becoming far less consequential than it used to be.
Click to expand...
Read more
Reply
K
KyL416
WPLG/10 Miami is now available to stream customers

The CW stations WCWW/25 South Bend and WBKP/5 Marquette are testing on the stream server

Last week they also added a bunch of CW stations that are still not available to sat customers:
WETM-DT/19 Elmira
WJET-DT/25 Erie
KLFY-DT/11 Lafayette LA
KARD-DT/15 Monroe
WVBT-DT/44 Norfolk
WTWO-DT/3 Terre Haute
WFXV-DT/34 Utica
KFDX-DT/4 Wichita Falls
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony and mario315
M
mario315
Well, that was fast ! DTV Stream brought back WTCN's HD signal today.

I have to assume the station signing up a week ago as the Miami Heat affiliate here (to carry their games) did the trick. NBA magic !!!

Or the station engineer took care of the problem after hearing about it.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: KyL416
D
darren_s
KyL416 said:
WNPX/28 Nashville (The new home of the Predators) and WMYD/20 Detroit (the new home of the Pistons) are testing on the stream server.
Click to expand...
Channel 28 Nashville hasn't been added so far, correct?
Read more
Reply
K
KyL416
WNPX Nashville and WMYD Detroit were added to stream about 2 months ago.

They also now have PRDTRS/651 for those in Predators territory outside of the Nashville DMA and PISTONS/663-2 for those in Pistons territory outside of the Detroit DMA.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (243)
TheForce
TheForce
Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Phone & Tablet Zone

Apple Event September 2026

Apple Fall Hardware Event takes place today, September 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:00 p.m. ET. It marks the debut of new CEO John Ternus and the expected reveal of Apple's first foldable phone.
Read more
132 Replies · 1466 views
Load Replies (132) Reply Legacy View
comfortably_numb
comfortably_numb
Can't remember if I've posted this yet..


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: slow_poke_pete
Foxbat
Foxbat
If you ponied up for an iPhone Duo, keep it away from anything other than your soft, fleshy fingertips. No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter. And don't bend it more than it needs to. Zack has destroyed $2,000 of Apple hardware to get those views, which should cover his expenses.
​
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: comfortably_numb
comfortably_numb
comfortably_numb
Foxbat said:
No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter
Click to expand...

And definitely no medieval chain armor!
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: Foxbat
harshness
harshness
comfortably_numb said:
medieval chain armor
Click to expand...
Aka "mail" or "maille".
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and comfortably_numb
Foxbat
Foxbat
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.
​

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.
Read more
Reply
S
slow_poke_pete
comfortably_numb said:
Can't remember if I've posted this yet..


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU
Click to expand...

most carriers do. that's why they send updates that slow phones down!! i buy unlocked phones no effect to me
Read more
Reply
S
slow_poke_pete
Foxbat said:
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.
​

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.
Click to expand...

hope you have apple care a screen job is 1000.00 :oops:. can we say over priced garbage!!!
Read more
Reply
View all replies (132)
meStevo
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section

NFL 2026-2027 Season

Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
Read more
127 Replies · 2319 views
Load Replies (127) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
rvvaquero
rvvaquero
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Mike0616, dfergie and b4pjoe
Y
Yespage
rvvaquero said:
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Click to expand...
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: b4pjoe
b4pjoe
b4pjoe
Yespage said:
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Click to expand...
Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: rvvaquero, osu1991 and Yespage
rvvaquero
rvvaquero
Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: b4pjoe and Mike0616
meStevo
meStevo
meStevo
Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Mike0616 and Foxbat
View all replies (127)
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHoCBzfrdmQ


Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 10 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYRNrj5MQzw


Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 18 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41qc5p2NdN4


Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 4 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Load More
Top
Back