Social Feed

smata671
Last reply · posted in Old YAHOOGROUPS - VOOM! Archives
Probably wrong, but this morning I called for something else and
asked about the upcoming software upgrade and the CS rep told me that
I needed a landline connected to the box to receive the next software
upgrade.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/EyMolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VOOM/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
VOOM-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
13 Replies · 2647 views
Aldo A. Falla
THANK YOU, I knew I couln't be the only sane person here...and guess what,
even when/if the add/correct everything "they" want, something else will
come up and the cycle will start right over...

To anyone reading this thread, PLEASE SPEAK UP IF YOU ARE HAPPY WITH VOOM!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Heitner [mailto:ddprobert@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:51 PM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


Ditto.

I want the missing channels as much as the next person but you don't see
me on here whining and making stupid empty threats.

I have two receivers and I got my parents to sign up for voom and they
have 3 receivers. We're all waiting, patiently I might add, for the missing
channels but we know they're gonna be added eventually and can wait. We're
all happy and love our VOOM. You talked about perfection.. well when voom
"does" add the missing channels and releases the dvr, voom will be just
that, perfect!

Loving Voom in Kemah, TX
Robert Heitner



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Eric [mailto:etoop@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:33 PM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


Thank you for Clarifying Aldo,

I agree 100%, lately there has been nothing but crabbing on here about
the service.... Which until 24 hours ago was wonderful. I didn't think this
forum was created for people to whine about the channels they don't have and
threaten to cancel if they don't appear. They knew what they were getting
from the start.

Thanks again

Eric



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Aldo A. Falla [mailto:afalla@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:20 PM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


My point is....

Everybody stop f*ing bitching about this and that...we all read when we
signed up that we needed a landline, I don't care how cool or smart you
think you are, or how much you save because you use DSL or any other phone
substitute, it's there in black and white so if you're not happy stop
bitching and cancel, stop putting down the service because you
neglected/chose to ignore the requirements.....

As far as OTA, you got the service for the HD, not to watch your g*d*mn
local news and/or channels on your 61" HD set....if you can afford an HD set
you better be able to afford additional local cable/additional dish for
those channels Voom doesn't carry, again their channel line up is listed
before hand in b/w, if you chose to ignore this and now you're bitching all
over the forums 'cause you can't get Sci Fi or HGTV it's on you!!...Let me
let you in on a little secret, get two receivers, one being your VOOM and
the other one being of your choice which carries your local
networks/superstations/OTAs & missing channels....Should anyone have really
spent all this money on an HD If they can't afford to have two receivers? HD
is not cheap, HD is cutting edge, with ANY AND ALL NEW TECHNOLOGY THERE ARE
DRAWBACKS, NOTHING IS PERFECT!!!

If you can't figure any of the above by yourselves then return your HD and
get a regular TV.

I'm sure I'm speaking for a large silent majority of people who have
nothing to complain, but are fed up with reading all these complaints and
whines...I don't even know who this Wilt guy is but the man's a saint, he
actually puts up with all the crybabies here...yeah yeah I know you want
your money back and you're tired of waiting for the CSR and/or Supervisor,
guess what? that's life, or better yet, GET A LIFE!!!

A VERY HAPPY VOOM CUSTOMER WITH LOCAL CABLE HD FOR MY OTA & VOOM FOR THE
HD!!!
and yes, I do get HGTV & the Sci Fi Channels...on my local cable!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric [mailto:etoop@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:57 PM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


Shut up!



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Aldo A. Falla [mailto:afalla@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 6:50 PM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


yeah...and don't pay your taxes to the IRS either, you really don't have
to!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric [mailto:etoop@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:59 AM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


I'm sure it is just like DirecTV and Dish where they say REQUIRED but
I have friends that have had them for years and NEVER had a phone line
plugged into it.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: smata671 [mailto:smata671@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:45 AM
To: VOOM@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [VOOM] Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next
Upgrade


Probably wrong, but this morning I called for something else and
asked about the upcoming software upgrade and the CS rep told me that
I needed a landline connected to the box to receive the next software
upgrade.










Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VOOM/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
VOOM-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.714 / Virus Database: 470 - Release Date: 7/2/2004
M
Aldo

Some of the people come to vent about certain things but you are very correct about the phone line issue. People new about up front. I do have to say tho I find legitimate complaints at times about service interruptions as about the TNT-HD the other night although I have to add that I would have not noticed that night because I was busy and not watching TV. I did offer my location and that I had the issue so that there would be a location for Voom to troubleshoot. Point being certain things need to be brought up, but many things are getting brought way to often. I want to add that more channels would be nice, but as you mentioned I have what Voom does not offer thru my local cable company. Before I ordered I looked at Vooms programing offering then printed out that line up -v- cable co lineup and chose the cable package to complement what Voom was missing. (Wifes channels are the cable ones hehe) I stick to Voom most of the time when I watch TV.
Pete In Plano
I LOVE Voom. They are state of the art and are going thru growing pains. The future of the technology is endless. I am hanging on for the long ride ahead. WM9, MPEG4, Oval dual LNB dish picking up 2 Sattelites!!!!!!!! 96 HD channels!!!! And I can RENT the boxes and not plunk down $499 each, which I don't have so I would not have HD without Voom!! $0 down and $0 installation. Come off it, NO ONE else has this!!!! Loving my Voom in Plano, TX
rkr0923
I disagree with the OTA signals...........Lot's of HD content on there for FREE!
if we had a STB that wasn't a Tonka
so, NO! I shouldn't have to pay for two services.
krose_59
[VOOM] Re: Customer Service Says Landline Required for Next Upgrade

My Voom box gets all the OTA channels just fine as it has from day
one. I don't even need local channel scanning in my situation, but I
understand others might need this feature. So far, they've kept the
local channel map updated when new channels hit the air. Now if the
local PBS and WB stations would get their act together and get on
the air, but that's a whole other story.

Overall, I'm quite happy with Voom, although there is always room
for improvment, both with the technical and programming sides. Some
people would never be happy no matter how many channels are added,
or how good the PQ is.



--- In VOOM@yahoogroups.com, rkr0923 <rkr0923.19qtrk@n...> wrote:
>
> I disagree with the OTA signals...........Lot's of HD content on

there
> for FREE!
> if we had a STB that wasn't a Tonka
> so, NO! I shouldn't have to pay for two services.
>
>
> --
> rkr0923




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/EyMolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VOOM/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
VOOM-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
M
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I have Dish with Hopper3. I choose to get local channels OTA and had a "guide list" established at my previous home. Having moved a few miles away, I wanted to update the list by appending a couple new stations via a rescan. As many would know, some stations come in with the UHF/VHF antenna aimed in one direction, while others come in better with a different direction.

Unfortunately, when a scan is done (bringing in 25-30 stations for that particular antenna aim), the dialog screen does not present the established guide list; it presents an empty field to the right that the scanned stations may be selected one by one and added to the empty guide. But because of antenna aim, some stations originally saved are missing, and would have to be retrieved with a different antenna aim. But as I explain, if a 2nd​ scan is done with a different antenna aim, the stations saved from the first scan are lost.

It troubles me that Dish didn't develop software that would allow a user to simply append only 1 or 2 channels to the established list. :mad:

Any thought on this? Has anyone experienced this or heard of this from others?
12 Replies · 438 views
dishstaller
I could very well be wrong....it has been a LOT of years but back when I had a 722K it seemed like when you went back to the scan screen that you could just scan again and it would ADD those channels to the previous list or you could delete the previous results and only add the channels from the new scan.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
M
Methinks you are wrong, Dishstaller - at least for what I see now..
I so wish that functionality was available ...
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
N
I could very well be wrong....it has been a LOT of years but back when I had a 722K it seemed like when you went back to the scan screen that you could just scan again and it would ADD those channels to the previous list or you could delete the previous results and only add the channels from the new scan.
I am not sure about that but I do know that you could manually add additional channels just by entering the actual RF channel number and the older receivers would add the virtual channels to your list
dishstaller
I am not sure about that but I do know that you could manually add additional channels just by entering the actual RF channel number and the older receivers would add the virtual channels to your list
Like I said.....that has been many years ago. Swapped my 722K for a Hopper in 2012.

It does seem like I remember having to delete the existing channels when we did a rescan. Back then our local stations KEPT monkeying around with things and it was non-stop complaints from customers about their channels not coming in. Got so bad that I stopped selling OR installing OTAs....something I had been doing since 1984 so you know it HAD to be pretty bad.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
M
You made one of my points for me with this comment, Dishstaller:

"... local stations KEPT monkeying around with things and it was non-stop complaints from customers about their channels not coming in ..."
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
138 Replies · 2836 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
HipKat
Balls
Bears. Took care of the elite Seahawks defense in a great performance.
NFC North. The entire division is 2 games above .500
Lions. Finally handed an L to that weird Minnesota team. Good vibes for Jack Campbell.
Pitt. Took the lead of the division convincingly.
Bengals vs Titans game. Fireworks game. Not sure it was a well-played game, but it sure was fun. JoeyB with 6 scores... and 4 turnovers.
Denver. They keep winning, man. Payton is a baller of a coach.
Packers. Thorough beatdown of the hard-to-read Panthers.
Jags. Demolished the hapless Colts.
Rams. The Super team finally wins back-to-back games.


Goats
Vikings. Took their first L. I know their D is insane, but their offense is setting back football to the 1950's.
Cowboys. Lost a 2-score lead vs. the Gardner Minshew-led Cards... at home. Embarrassing.
Browns. Playing for the division lead by scoring 6 points.
Bucs vs Falcons game. Setting modern football back to the ice age. Honorable mention to Tua Penix err ... Michael Tagov .... well, you know what I mean.
Bengals fans acting like Burrow just won the MVP after his performance. I get it. 6 scores is awesome. But. He also turned the ball over 4 times and required overtime to beat the 1-win Titans. So spare me the parade.
Chiefs. Not because they lost. It was a close game decided on the last play vs. a divisional rival on the road. That's always rough. But because of their whining over the CLEAR flag they got on the would-be winning play. They are used to getting the calls, and when they don't, they complain. Honorable mention to Mahomes for this quote: "I mean, at the end of the day, you have to go with whatever is called, but a lot of times in those big moments, the little stuff doesn't get called like that"... so you admit it was a penalty?? Just shut up, man.
Colts. They began the fire sale earlier in the week, and it showed. This team is cooked; Daniel Jones should go to the bench, and Steichen will be fired pretty soon.
Chargers. Wow. That's all I got.
Miami. For having the Pats sort of on the ropes and letting them go.
Eagles. Another team that should consider selling some assets. They are going nowhere.
Howard Simmons
Balls
Bears. Took care of the elite Seahawks defense in a great performance.
NFC North. The entire division is 2 games above .500
Lions. Finally handed an L to that weird Minnesota team. Good vibes for Jack Campbell.
Pitt. Took the lead of the division convincingly.
Bengals vs Titans game. Fireworks game. Not sure it was a well-played game, but it sure was fun. JoeyB with 6 scores... and 4 turnovers.
Denver. They keep winning, man. Payton is a baller of a coach.
Packers. Thorough beatdown of the hard-to-read Panthers.
Jags. Demolished the hapless Colts.
Rams. The Super team finally wins back-to-back games.


Goats
Vikings. Took their first L. I know their D is insane, but their offense is setting back football to the 1950's.
Cowboys. Lost a 2-score lead vs. the Gardner Minshew-led Cards... at home. Embarrassing.
Browns. Playing for the division lead by scoring 6 points.
Bucs vs Falcons game. Setting modern football back to the ice age. Honorable mention to Tua Penix err ... Michael Tagov .... well, you know what I mean.
Bengals fans acting like Burrow just won the MVP after his performance. I get it. 6 scores is awesome. But. He also turned the ball over 4 times and required overtime to beat the 1-win Titans. So spare me the parade.
Chiefs. Not because they lost. It was a close game decided on the last play vs. a divisional rival on the road. That's always rough. But because of their whining over the CLEAR flag they got on the would-be winning play. They are used to getting the calls, and when they don't, they complain. Honorable mention to Mahomes for this quote: "I mean, at the end of the day, you have to go with whatever is called, but a lot of times in those big moments, the little stuff doesn't get called like that"... so you admit it was a penalty?? Just shut up, man.
Colts. They began the fire sale earlier in the week, and it showed. This team is cooked; Daniel Jones should go to the bench, and Steichen will be fired pretty soon.
Chargers. Wow. That's all I got.
Miami. For having the Pats sort of on the ropes and letting them go.
Eagles. Another team that should consider selling some assets. They are going nowhere.
Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.🙄
meStevo
Just the same vilification as players like Brady experienced, a product of their success and largely overblown (just like them 'getting all the calls').
  • Like
Reactions: Mike0616 and AZ.
Y
Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.🙄
Well you see him more because he is incredibly talented. And yes, typically players try to spin things being in their favor. This isn't cricket where sportsmanship (except in Australia) is expected.
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
HipKat
Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.🙄
He wants to be Brady
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: AZ. and Mike0616
HipKat
Just the same vilification as players like Brady experienced, a product of their success and largely overblown (just like them 'getting all the calls').
The only people who deny what Brady got from the officials are Brady fans
  • Like
Reactions: AZ. and Mike0616
gms49ers
The NFL, for some time, has protected the marquee quarterbacks. Brady, Mahomes, Allen, Burrow - they all get the calls.
The lower tier QBs don't seem to get the same benefit. For instance, some of the hits that Darnold took from Chicago on Monday night would have been a flag frenzy if any of the marquee QBs were hit like that. And I am not in any way a fan of anything Seahawks related. I am a fan of balanced officiating - and that hasn't been the case for a while.

My team is not immune to this - Fred Warner laid some vicious hits in the Commanders game that I thought should have been flagged - one was, but they picked it up.

Not a good look on NFL officials.
ewindowman
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th
448 Replies · 15352 views
nelson61
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Scott Greczkowski
Washington Post

SpaceX has held talks with Boost's parent company EchoStar in recent months about launching its own signature wireless service through a deal with the company, according to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Musk, the SpaceX CEO, has discussed the deal personally, meeting with EchoStar chairman Charlie Ergen last month, according to the people. The potential deal may result in SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile or SpaceX gaining access to its network, which it leases from AT&T and T-Mobile US, the people said.
Access to those lease agreements would be a coup for SpaceX. The back door would allow Musk to make a play for a U.S. wireless market that equity research firm MoffettNathanson estimates is worth $235 billion. But the proposed service may need consent from those carriers for the service to actually launch, the people said.
Can't remember where or who I saw predict this. :D

It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Bruce
It wouldn't surprise me to see Elon soon own all of DISH / Echostar in the future.
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
Scott Greczkowski
Again, why would Musk want a TV Service, specially one that is losing over a million subscribers a year.

Phone service…maybe, but not TV.
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Bruce
I know he wants TV. He wants to deliver EVERYTHING to EVERYWHERE.
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.
S
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Nebugeater
Again, if so, why would he want Dish/Sling of all the providers?

He could deliver anything without actually owning, for example, watching the Lions game in my Tesla Y on it's screen via the YT app, while on the way to my future in-laws on Sunday.


Just a guess on my part but there may be some value to aquring to get all the retransmision agreements that are in place even though at some point they need to be renewed
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Bruce
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68750 Replies · 2684688 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
H
Roll Me Up And SMOKE Me When I Die-Willie Nelson
ClarkGable
Roll On Down The Highway - Bachman-Turner Overdrive
FTA4PA
Highway To Hell - AC/DC
dishstaller
Highway Song - Blackfoot
gms49ers
The Rain Song - Led Zeppelin
T
Last reply · posted in FTA Receiver / Equipment Support
Anyone watching IPTV on Amiko 4k s52 UHD ?

I put a bunch of *.m3u files in the root of my USB KEY but Amiko won't try to play them?

No INSTRUCTIONS for this.

Dan
1 Replies · 99 views
zippyfrog
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Over the past year I have been tracking the changes on Western Arc. The past 3 months have had a lot of changes that I posted in the other MPEG2 Western Arc shutdown thread. Now that 129 is (basically) out of commission, here is where Western Arc stands. This is just a national channel list, (no local channels) based off what I can see and what others have contributed. Thanks to everyone who has helped me come up with the locations of some of the channels – I would try and list all of you out, but I know I would forget someone! As has been suggested in other parts of the forum, it would be great to collect the spotbeam data for those who could contribute!

A couple of pieces of info:
  • Out of the 64 transponders between 110/119, there are currently 50 transponders that Dish is licensed to use. 22 are Spotbeams, 28 are ConUS transponders (14 transponders are licensed to DirecTV and Dish doesn't have access to them)
  • Those 28 ConUS transponders are divided as follows:
    • 10 are dedicated to National HD channels (ESPN, CNN, Disney Channel, etc). Dish is maxing out at 16 HD channels per transponder (note – in an earlier post I said there was one transponder with 17 HD channels, that was an error on my part. When I double checked my listings, one channel changed transponders). Before the transition, there was a maximum of 14 HD channels per transponder.
    • 1 transponder is dedicated to adult content
    • 2 are a mixture HD PPV Movies/4k channels
    • 3 are set aside for HD Sports channels that are only on for live games (NBA League Pass, the PAC 12 alternate channels, some PPV events, etc); 3 SD PPV Sports Channels are there as well.
    • 7 are for SD and/or music channels. Dish is maxing out at 26 SD channels per transponder thus far on the SD transponders.
    • 5 transponders on 110 I have no channels listed but Dish operates. (they are labeled as ConUS on my chart below) There are other things that could be on those transponders, like RV Distant Networks, internal testing channels, etc, that I can't see. They might be able to be used for additional content, but I am not sure exactly what is on those transponders.
There are two transponders that have lower than normal SD channels – 110, TP 21 and 119, TP 19. Previously those transponders contained the programming guides that get downloaded from the satellite when the receivers download EPG. I assume that is where the programming guides are still downloaded from, thus less channels there.

When I talk about number of channels on a transponder, all my numbers are unique channels – for example, channel 101 and 199 are the same channel mapped to two different numbers, but in terms of space, only takes up 1 channel worth of bandwidth on the transponder.

Finally, I have to give Dish a ton of credit. When it was 110/119/129, Dish had 82 transponders they were using – it took a lot to get it down to 50 transponders and figure out where all the pieces were going to go. What are the things they did to get there? Here are the things I saw:
  • During this migration from 129, Dish converted 7 ConUS transponders on 119 into Spotbeams – that is how they ended up fitting on all the HD locals that used to be on 129. (for those interested, TP 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 are the ones that used to be ConUS on 119 that are now Spotbeam)
  • Removed almost all SD duplicate channels that are offered in HD
  • Converted remaining SD channels from MPEG2 to MPEG4
  • There are also 2 subtle things that changed from the HD channel perspective
    • At the beginning of the transition, Dish decreased the number of PPV Movie channels – prior to this transition the PPV channels HD PPV movies were 502-522; now they are 502-517.
    • At the beginning of April when MLB, NBA, and NHL regular seasons were all going on at the same time and this transition began, there were a ton of games "joined in progress" for the HD feeds. That wasn't common since the days before the full time HD RSN's. The reason for that was prior to the transition, Dish had 4 transponders set aside for HD Sports – 2 transponders was the bandwidth set aside from the HD RSN's before Dish dropped the RSN's, then 2 transponders were for alternate channels. Now we are down to 3 transponders for HD sports.
254 Replies · 66410 views
zippyfrog
Dish has officially removed all the locals from 119 and they are all on 110 now. TP 02, 04, 06, 08, 10 were all functioning as Spotbeams as of last week, but now they are ConUS.

This means all 21 transponders that Dish has access to at 119 are now ConUS.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
D
Dish has officially removed all the locals from 119 and they are all on 110 now.
Might be a silly question, but does this mean ALL 29 TP's on 110 are positively spot beams now?
zippyfrog
Might be a silly question, but does this mean ALL 29 TP's on 110 are positively spot beams now?
Nope - TP 1-13 are still ConUS on 110. Which is crazy...there are so many different spotbeams on the new 110 satellite compared to the older 110 or 119. Now, someone can correct me if I am wrong on this - but aren't there two satellites at 110 right now? If so, it looks like TP 1-13 are coming from the old satellite at 110 and 14 onward are spotbeams on the new satellite.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
D
Now, someone can correct me if I am wrong on this - but aren't there two satellites at 110 right now?
Hopefully nelson61 can chime in on this one, because I'm not sure, either.
I guess the thing I'm really perplexed about, is if there are NO more locals - at least on spotbeams - on 119, then how DID they cram ALL the locals on 110 & NOT have ALL those x-ponders in SB mode by now?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
zippyfrog
Hopefully nelson61 can chime in on this one, because I'm not sure, either.
I guess the thing I'm really perplexed about, is if there are NO more locals - at least on spotbeams - on 119, then how DID they cram ALL the locals on 110 & NOT have ALL those x-ponders in SB mode by now?

Here was a comment by nelson61 last year:
EchoStar 23 (Conus beam) will still be at 110W so there can be some Conus beam coverage from 110W depending on how many transponders they use for the spots.
In the same thread, he gave all the kml files for the spotbeams to put on Google Earth, and it looks like there are a lot more spotbeams per transponder available than the old satellite. My gut is that there is just a more technilogically advanced satellite, and can handle more channels.

I would love an analysis of how many channels could be fit on all the spots!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
D
My gut is that there is just a more technilogically advanced satellite, and can handle more channels.
My only trouble with that explanation, is the fact that they are wasting at least 1 TP (TP 10, to be precise) on a local market (part of the Chicago locals are on that TP) that could be used for more CONUS channels (namely more HD!)
zippyfrog
My only trouble with that explanation, is the fact that they are wasting at least 1 TP (TP 10, to be precise) on a local market (part of the Chicago locals are on that TP) that could be used for more CONUS channels (namely more HD!)
I ran the Schedule S through ChatGPT to analyze the data quickly, and according to ChatGPT, the 16 transponders currently being used for SpotBeams on 110 is all that has been authorized by the FCC. So Dish might be using TP 01-13 for ConUS on 110 for the foreseeable future. If that is the case, Dish has a ton of space to bring in more HD channels nationally or use that bandwidth for something else.

I know my lists aren't perfect as I can't see all the test channels and behind the scenes channels, but for channels available to subscribers - there are no channels on 119 TP 01-08 and 10; and on 110, TP14 has only 4 channels. With Dish putting 16 HD channels per transponder right now, that is about 145+ slots for HD channels that are available if Dish does keep 110 as ConUS for TP 01-13.

1793870854650.webp