Social Feed

H
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV General Forum
This might be old news, but I thought it was funny. I am watching the Royals v. Mariners game (MLBEI) via FSN KC. A Time Warner commercial come on and the guy says the D* DOES NOT HAVE HD programming on demand. So I went to my OD screen and chose high def, and guess what I found......;)

Damn cable co's.....:D
16 Replies · 4485 views
D
Cable is desperate...
P
I'm pretty sure DirecTV's VOD is out of beta. I haven't set it up because no broadband here.
N
Cable is desperate...

AMEN!!! They just lost another customer today when my wife called to cancel our TWC service after having D* installed yesterday. They asked her why ... she said her husband wanted MORE HD ... and I got it too ... 46 channels as opposed to TWC's 13. They said they are increasing their number of HD channels soon. Why wait? :hungry: Besides, the D* DVR is so much more feature packed than the seriously crippled TWC one where no ports are supported ... no USB, no SATA, no Firewire, no Ethernet ... and you can only have one output at a time ... so cannot get anything off of the hard drive, nor increase the hard drive size. Bye bye TWC ... it was a pleasure to say so.
skottey
I'm pretty sure DirecTV's VOD is out of beta. I haven't set it up because no broadband here.

No broadband? That sucks. You must really be in east Kentucky... BFEgypt. The small town in northern Michigan I grew up in has had broadband for 6-7 years and there are less than 25,000 citizens county-wide up there. Glad I got out of there 13 1/2 years ago.

Hasn't the price come down on directduo, or whatever they are calling it now? I keep seeing ads for satellite broadband with DirecTV on DirecTV's national network spot ads. I think you still need a phone line for upload but download over the sat. You can forget online gaming with the latency but it would be useful for surfing and downloading DirecTV VOD.
Jimbo
AMEN!!! They just lost another customer today when my wife called to cancel our TWC service after having D* installed yesterday. They asked her why ... she said her husband wanted MORE HD ... and I got it too ... 46 channels as opposed to TWC's 13. They said they are increasing their number of HD channels soon. Why wait? :hungry: Besides, the D* DVR is so much more feature packed than the seriously crippled TWC one where no ports are supported ... no USB, no SATA, no Firewire, no Ethernet ... and you can only have one output at a time ... so cannot get anything off of the hard drive, nor increase the hard drive size. Bye bye TWC ... it was a pleasure to say so.

Why do you only have 46 HD channels ?
skottey
so cannot get anything off of the hard drive, nor increase the hard drive size. Bye bye TWC ... it was a pleasure to say so.

How do you get stuff off the hard drive with DirecTV and what context do you mean with "getting it off the hard drive?" The data is encrypted and unreadable on a PC, at least with Dish and DirecTV. If there is a program that can read a movie file from DirecTV on the PC, I'd like to hear about it.

I realize you can buy an eSATA hard drive and expand your storage space (which you can do with TW's twin BHN too by the way, at least with the SA 8300HD like we have in the Tampa market). But as far as I know you cannot just hook that drive up to a PC and copy the data over and somehow read a high quality HD movie by breaking the encryption and making a useful file out of it that you can store on the PC and share with others. Maybe I am missing something. Really, what do you mean by getting it off the hard drive?
skottey
Why do you only have 46 HD channels ?

He is either counting the true count (NO game only RSNs, broadcast networks, PPVs) or he isn't subscribing to the Premiere pack or any premiums. We certainly don't get 95 HD channels (even with the Premiere pack), but I am not complaining about what I get. I am very happy with DirecTV. I just wish they would take the initiative and stop lying about the number of HD channels. Then others would follow suit.

Instead of worrying about windfall profits with the oil companies, who are straight up about their profits and doing legitimate business in the US, congress should be holding hearings about all satellite and cable providers and come up with a standard for counting HD channels. The lies need to stop. The average Joe thinks he is getting 95 HD nationals. Nevermind that a bunch of them in the count are PPV movies he'll never order. We all know that PPV is not the same thing as real HD channels like HDNET, HGTV HD, CNN HD, HBO HD, etc... anybody that counts HD PPV in a national channel HD count is not being truthful. Like I said twice before, if Verizon FIOS, who has the bandwidth, added 400 HD PPV channels with movies starting at five minute intervals, would you count them as having an addional 400 HD nationals? No you wouldn't. I love DirecTV and am not picking on them. Just about all providers are lying nowadays, pretending they really have 95 or 32 or 17 HD nationals. This sh*t is very misleading and proably falls under FALSE ADVERTISING laws.
Jimbo
He is either counting the true count (NO game only RSNs, broadcast networks, PPVs) or he isn't subscribing to the Premiere pack or any premiums. We certainly don't get 95 HD channels (even with the Premiere pack), but I am not complaining about what I get. I am very happy with DirecTV. I just wish they would take the initiative and stop lying about the number of HD channels. Then others would follow suit.

Instead of worrying about windfall profits with the oil companies, who are straight up about their profits and doing legitimate business in the US, congress should be holding hearings about all satellite and cable providers and come up with a standard for counting HD channels. The lies need to stop. The average Joe thinks he is getting 95 HD nationals. Nevermind that a bunch of them in the count are PPV movies he'll never order. We all know that PPV is not the same thing as real HD channels like HDNET, HGTV HD, CNN HD, HBO HD, etc... anybody that counts HD PPV in a national channel HD count is not being truthful. Like I said twice before, if Verizon FIOS, who has the bandwidth, added 400 HD PPV channels with movies starting at five minute intervals, would you count them as having an addional 400 HD nationals? No you wouldn't. I love DirecTV and am not picking on them. Just about all providers are lying nowadays, pretending they really have 95 or 32 or 17 HD nationals. This sh*t is very misleading and proably falls under FALSE ADVERTISING laws.

How can they NOT count RSN's, although I feel the RSN should count as 1 channel, not the total number of RSN's.
The way I look at it, IF you are able to purchase it thru D*, it should count.

PPV's should also count as one, kinda as a seperate area.

Actually I really don't care about the number of HD channels, IF everything I watch is in HD thats enough for me.

There are very few channels left that I watch that are not in HD, Comedy Central being one of them, now that my local RSN is in HD, I'm pretty much set, oh, maybe TV Land would be good too.
That said, there is still alot of HD channels that are showing a small amount of HD.

Like I said before, if all the channels I watch are in HD then I have no need for any more....

Jimbo
harshness
Why do you only have 46 HD channels ?
According to the DIRECTV website, you get about 46 HD channels (including LIL plus one RSN but not including PPV/event channels) when you subscribe to a Choice Xtra or Plus package and add the HD Extra pack.
hdtvtechno
No broadband? That sucks. You must really be in east Kentucky... BFEgypt. The small town in northern Michigan I grew up in has had broadband for 6-7 years and there are less than 25,000 citizens county-wide up there. Glad I got out of there 13 1/2 years ago.

Hasn't the price come down on directduo, or whatever they are calling it now? I keep seeing ads for satellite broadband with DirecTV on DirecTV's national network spot ads. I think you still need a phone line for upload but download over the sat. You can forget online gaming with the latency but it would be useful for surfing and downloading DirecTV VOD.

I think its been upgraded to two way satellite internet now..no phone line required
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 0 views
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
128 Replies · 2388 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
rvvaquero
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Y
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
  • Like
Reactions: AZ. and b4pjoe
b4pjoe
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.
rvvaquero
Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.
meStevo
Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.
HipKat
Balls
Bears. Gave the Pats a good beatdown.
Bucs. Got Baker back and absolutely demolished the previously surprising Panthers.
Falcons. Took care of the 49ers and did so convincingly.
Vikings. I hate them. I do. I've never seen such a bad/good team. Know what I mean? I know their D is epic. But their O is insulting. How they remain undefeated is a mystery.
Rams. Finally looked the part. Mind you against the hapless Cards.
Cowboys. Fireworks performance from their O.
Dolphins. Finally logged in a W. There won't be many. Enjoy it, Miami fans.
Browns. Still atop the AFC North.
Giants. Epic OT win with Buffalo's very own Motor Singletary finishing it off.
Seattle. Dominated KC from start to finish.

Goats
Jets. Couldn't beat the winless Dolphins. Aaron Glenn is a dead man walking.
Eagles. Injured beyond repair
Ravens and Lamar. Has he ever played a full season? Honestly, dude is fragile. Of course he's back for the Bills game.
49ers. No longer undefeated.
Colts. A sh*t show. When are they gonna realize that Daniel Jones is ass?
Steelers vs Saints game. Ass, just ass all around. Those poor people in Paris have had enough lately, and on top of that, endure that game.
Chiefs. They looked terrible. Like really bad.
Pack vs. Detroit game refs. Some of the worst refereeing I've seen in a long time. And the sample is pretty large.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68634 Replies · 2679088 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
EatMyVolts
The 59th Street Bridge Song -- Simon & Garfunkel
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
10 Replies · 544 views
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
Mister B
What bothers me is the total waste of broadcasting spectrum in this very crowded market. It has been almost three years now since KFOX converted their broadcast tower to ATSC 3.0 and moved all of their channels to other towers causing noticeable degradation of the picture quality.
I have a Sony TV with 3.0 capabilities but still use the 1.0 version of locals due to the fact that one or all of the 3.0 channels are often missing or unwatchable. In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.
The only thing that could motivate me to be interested in 3.0 would be if all of the minor networks (diginets) could be in at least 720P rather than blurry ultra-compressed 480i.
Three years is long enough to waste one of the few available RF frequencies in the area for this trial.
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.
navychop
In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.

They might notice the hand going into their pocket for their wallet.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
navychop
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.

QFT. Of course, my preference involves a curb and some kicking.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
S
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
WHAT ABOUT THE INTERNET PART OF IT. NO ONE WANTS A BOX CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET EITHER.
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Local Radio Discussion
21 Replies · 602 views
dishdude
It's probably been 2 decades since I've listened to an AM radio station. Very rarely listen to FM any more.
  • Like
Reactions: reubenray and Jimbo
Jimbo
I am 1 that wants the AM to Stay ....
That said, since '08 I have had Sat radio available to me ... I think I have turned on AM 3 or 4 times, just to see if its still there.

Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Even FM, I haven't really had on since '13ish, I may turn it on from time to time, just to see if its still there.
harshness
Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Automation has seen to that. You can't get evening drive traffic reports where I live, much less disaster reports.
dishstaller
Very rarely listen to FM any more
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
Jimbo
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
dishstaller
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
No, just regular FM stations. One is the country station I mentioned and the other is a Talk Radio station which used to get fantastic results but honestly, since the death of Rush Limbaugh, talk radio just doesn't do as well. There were two guys who had an early morning show which was hugely popular here in the southeast but one of them retired a couple years ago and the show just doesn't garner the same numbers as it used to.
S
Haven't listened AM or FM in years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 12 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4944 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 5 views