Social Feed

waltinvt said:

Satellites? Blu-ray Clarity Claims May Be Dubious - TVWeek - News


More recently, the satcasters have announced upcoming 1080-pixel broadcasts.

Click to expand...

We're listing to a source that thinks this is what the "p" stands for?

tempVAdish said:

We're listing to a source that thinks this is what the "p" stands for?

Click to expand...

Good point - I didn't even catch that but the premise is still valid and providers will probably always dog-sh*t their transmissions enough so the disks continue to be the top of the quality spectrum. I'm not so sure that isn't forgone and un-intentional either.

waltinvt said:

Good point - I didn't even catch that but the premise is still valid and providers will probably always dog-sh*t their transmissions enough so the disks continue to be the top of the quality spectrum. I'm not so sure that isn't forgone and un-intentional either.

Click to expand...

The premise may be valid if this was to "Live TV", but the 1080P Video on Demand, is the only "advertised" 1080P feature for DISH at this time. If that is what is being offered and if no additional compression is occuring to the content, then the premise isn't valid.

VOD 501 channels currently work where the receiver, when a tunner is unused between 1:00AM and 6:00AM streams down content (not at a live bit rate) and stores it to a special VOD partition on the disk. DISH purposely put in much larger hard drives, so even if the VOD partition fills up, there is no reduction to the users space for their own recorded content. Once that VOD content is completely downloaded, it's displayed in the guide and can be purchased for viewing. If it's downloaded and I want to watch it at 1:22PM, it starts at the very beginning at 1:22PM and I have the ability to fast forward, rewind and restart it as many times as I want for 24 hours.

Because the VOD streams are not transmitted at a "live" bitrate, they can download content of a very high quality and not be concerned that several seconds of video take a minute to stream off the SAT. Thus the viewing bitrate for the 1080P content off of the hard drive can be at a significantly higher rate than may be possible over a "channel" of 8PSK on the SAT transmission. This allows DISH, if desired for the program, to have Blue-Ray Disc quality content. Perhaps the hollywood studios might alter this content some to try and encourage the purchase of the Disc, but the technology is fully capable of that in combination with the "Hard disk" buffer. Plus Blue-Ray Disc houses, that embrace a possible method of allowing the user to click to purchase the Disc, could use the VOD to create additional sales. Simply at the conclusion of the video present a request to the user if they want to purchase the disc or not. DISH then ships it to the billing address on record and charges the SRP for the disc. It would behove DISH to ensure that the content viewed during the VOD is the same as the received disc, or customers would likely complain.

I watched 1080P "I am Legend" and was "blown away" by that much clarity from a HD DVR. The only beef I can see "anywhere" that has someone truely viewing the IAL content is that the aspect ratio was changed from the original aspect to fullscreen 16:9 AR. OAR purists would then have a valid reason to complain. Myself, I purchased an HDTV to get rid of letterbox gaps on my screen. Much to my dismay, many OAR content is still "letterboxed" and I actually enjoy 16:9 AR conversions better. This varies from customer to customer of course. Perhaps they can offer two versions of the VOD channel, one in OAR and one in the 16:9 AR.

Money, Money, MONEY! Its all stupid. Just burn your money away because that is what PEOPLE are DOING to such claims like this one!

Can not wait to see Dish Network Sued over this marketing CRAP. Post card and email sent to me saying, August 1st Dish Network upgraded VOD to 1080p and I would be able to see, I am Legend, for the entire month at a discounted rate of $1.99.

Well, sorry to say, its now August 31, still no 1080p VOD software or I am Legend available for me to watch!

I have a 1080p 71" TV, HDMI connection, 7.1 surround sound, never misses a 3am reset, and my bill is over $200 a month. There is NO REASON, why I was not able to have the software downloaded and installed. Plain and simple and I wish everyone the best who sues Dish Network because the post card and email mislead me into thinking my setup would have access. I even stopped recording the Olympics because of the 3am resets. I had to figure out Vista Ultimate's Windows Media player system to view the items I wanted.

DishSatUser said:

The premise may be valid if this was to "Live TV", but the 1080P Video on Demand, is the only "advertised" 1080P feature for DISH at this time. If that is what is being offered and if no additional compression is occuring to the content, then the premise isn't valid.

Click to expand...

Whether live or not, the premise still potentially exists because in the end "X" amount of space is taken up on the HDD and the amount of that space IS related to the visual / audio quality of the VOD. And since, as you say, the amount of HDD space that Dish doesn't allow customers access to (without paying extra) is finite, there exists the incentive for them to cram as many of their products into it as possible.

To what extent they will remains to be seen but historically Dish favors quantity over quality.

DishSatUser said:

VOD 501 channels currently work where the receiver, when a tunner is unused between 1:00AM and 6:00AM streams down content (not at a live bit rate) and stores it to a special VOD partition on the disk. DISH purposely put in much larger hard drives, so even if the VOD partition fills up, there is no reduction to the users space for their own recorded content.

Click to expand...

Do we know for sure that the proportions of these partitions have remained the same or is it possible that Dish has or could change these allocations via software downloads? It's hard to tell because of MPEG4 and 35 hours of HD movies takes up less space than MPEG2 did. I believe we can now hold more than 35 hours, so maybe they split the difference.

DishSatUser said:

Because the VOD streams are not transmitted at a "live" bitrate, they can download content of a very high quality and not be concerned that several seconds of video take a minute to stream off the SAT. Thus the viewing bitrate for the 1080P content off of the hard drive can be at a significantly higher rate than may be possible over a "channel" of 8PSK on the SAT transmission. This allows DISH, if desired for the program, to have Blue-Ray Disc quality content.

Click to expand...

"If desired" being the operative phrase. Since allocated (storage) space is still an issue, don't they still have the choice of whether to offer "X" choices of 1080p VODs at full quality or "X+1 or 2" at less quality?

DishSatUser said:

Perhaps the hollywood studios might alter this content some to try and encourage the purchase of the Disc, but the technology is fully capable of that in combination with the "Hard disk" buffer. Plus Blue-Ray Disc houses, that embrace a possible method of allowing the user to click to purchase the Disc, could use the VOD to create additional sales. Simply at the conclusion of the video present a request to the user if they want to purchase the disc or not. DISH then ships it to the billing address on record and charges the SRP for the disc. It would behove DISH to ensure that the content viewed during the VOD is the same as the received disc, or customers would likely complain.

Click to expand...

I suppose there's two ways of looking at that: show exactly what you can have if you purchase the BD or market that it gets even better with the BD.

It really doesn't matter much because the real issue here is that they've already gained (and are using) the ability to prevent you from keeping the movie on your HD DVR - that was the important thing. Now they can play around with marketing gimmicks and pricing because they're insured that unless you want to wait for it to trickle down the media chain, you're going to have to pay one way or another every time you want to watch a movie........ OR you're going to have to purchase it.

DishSatUser said:

I watched 1080P "I am Legend" and was "blown away" by that much clarity from a HD DVR.

Click to expand...

And I wonder how many people will be smart enough to wonder why then, if this kind of quality IS possible on an HD-DVR, haven't they been getting it right along? Maybe some will even be smart enough to realize progressive vs interlaced doesn't account for all the difference and maybe they've been getting something called "Dish-HD" instead of the full quality HD that was initially (probably a big mistake)offered.

If anyone cares to research old threads, I stated back when "E" followed "D" and lowered the picture quality of their HD (that's when they renamed it "Dish-HD" BTW), that you've likely never see full HD again on satellite unless they worked out a way to be able to charge you more $$ and restrict your ability to archive it.

DishSatUser said:

The only beef I can see "anywhere" that has someone truely viewing the IAL content is that the aspect ratio was changed from the original aspect to fullscreen 16:9 AR. OAR purists would then have a valid reason to complain. Myself, I purchased an HDTV to get rid of letterbox gaps on my screen.

Click to expand...

HDTV has never claimed it would eliminate the letterbox gaps - only provide a format closer to wide screen aspect ratios of movies while still being able to show tv's 4:3 AR reasonably well.

DishSatUser said:

Much to my dismay, many OAR content is still "letterboxed" and I actually enjoy 16:9 AR conversions better. This varies from customer to customer of course. Perhaps they can offer two versions of the VOD channel, one in OAR and one in the 16:9 AR.

Click to expand...

As you say, it varies from customer to customer and the bottom line is some would rather degrade the programming they paid for to use all the screen they paid for while others would rather get ALL the picture they paid for and realize that, just like the theater, in a darkened room with a dark tv surround, they can't even tell that the picture proportions doesn't quite match their tv screen size.

waltinvt said:

Mercer wrote on his blog this week, adding that the Blu-ray Disc Association called the satcasters' statements "irresponsible" and "misleading." .

Click to expand...

What???

That just isn't possible!!

Dish and Direct would never ever do that!!

Say it ain't so!!

For what it's worth, "I am Legend" will be shown on Cinemax in October. The first showing will be October 1st at 10pm.

waltinvt said:

Do we know for sure that the proportions of these partitions have remained the same or is it possible that Dish has or could change these allocations via software downloads? It's hard to tell because of MPEG4 and 35 hours of HD movies takes up less space than MPEG2 did. I believe we can now hold more than 35 hours, so maybe they split the difference.

Click to expand...

While it is "possible" that the partition sizes could be changed due to "software upgrade" capabilities of the receivers, it's improbable.

The reason is, and I'm sure you've seen this on Desktop PCs, additional software is required to "resize or reallocate" partitions without data loss. In the PC world, this is PartitionMagic or other competing products. Since programming space itself is a premium and Dish likely wants more "pay" interactive services, it's not probable a dynamic resizing utility is included on the receiver. So to resize the partitions, there would a complete loss of customer based recordings. This would have significant impact on customer satisfaction and not likely to be a point they'll change.


Instead, they could simply put in a larger HD in the future and rebrand the same receiver as the ViP 1022 (8xx and 9xx numbers being skipped due to end of production equipment already in those ranges). More $ to them for the new equipment that simply provides more recording space. Granted, many customers can simply use an external USB HD to get the same results, sans VOD space, but they rely on the majority of the customers being clueless to this fact.

But the point is, it's most likely improbable they'll do anything to the partitions.

waltinvt said:

It really doesn't matter much because the real issue here is that they've already gained (and are using) the ability to prevent you from keeping the movie on your HD DVR - that was the important thing. Now they can play around with marketing gimmicks and pricing because they're insured that unless you want to wait for it to trickle down the media chain, you're going to have to pay one way or another every time you want to watch a movie........ OR you're going to have to purchase it.

Click to expand...

Thought the real issue wwas the "dubious clains at Blu-Ray clarity" and not if Dish or DirecTV controls the move on your HD DVR. So does Comcast or "any" DVR vendor that provides the capbilities for software updates (so to that extent even stand alone Tivo's). It's simply a mater for them to exercise that capability. But to me, the important issue is it at the same level of clarity? The article went into the HD channels and not the "exclusivity" of the VOD channels that Dish advertised. In that case, I could extend the claim to say....

"Yep it's BS on the clarity, the SD channels even prove that!" That's not what Dish advertised. To the extent that the "VOD and VOD only" for the terms that Dish advertised, the capability to stream to the HD allows for the "clarity to match Blu-Ray".

Now as you suggest, it is also possible for Dish if desired to compress the result for more VOD on the system. For that mater, any provider can compress the heck out of anything they want. What's to stop them? However, Dish does have market share to claim if they stick by what they advertised for the VOD. By doing the background stream, the only benefit of compression at all is more content to the VOD partition. I can't argue that this may occur, but at this point it is not the case in terms of the VOD partition's capacity.

waltinvt said:

And I wonder how many people will be smart enough to wonder why then, if this kind of quality IS possible on an HD-DVR, haven't they been getting it right along? Maybe some will even be smart enough to realize progressive vs interlaced doesn't account for all the difference and maybe they've been getting something called "Dish-HD" instead of the full quality HD that was initially (probably a big mistake)offered.

Click to expand...

If one takes what was advertised and then applies it in general, then yes I can see the confusion to those individuals. The only way around this due to bandwidth limits of the SAT's is to reduce content choice or .... not offer live TV and require a buffered amount on the HD before you could even view TV. The last option is not acceptable to the consumer so compression is required. Again this is not what Dish is advertising with the 1080P VOD channels.

[SARCASM ON]But your right! Perhaps Dish should can the VOD channels and we can all just be happy with the DishHD compression channels. The option of renting 1080P VOD is just tooooooo much! For shame Dish for offering me more choice and options with my equipment![/SARCASM OFF]

waltinvt said:

If anyone cares to research old threads, I stated back when "E" followed "D" and lowered the picture quality of their HD (that's when they renamed it "Dish-HD" BTW), that you've likely never see full HD again on satellite unless they worked out a way to be able to charge you more $$ and restrict your ability to archive it.

Click to expand...

Dude!! You've got kitchen sink syndrome as I never argued against your old threads. I specifically called the validity of the article into question as they extended the 1080P VOD claim to the live TV HD channels. A point that would be accurate on the live TV, but isn't "yet" accurate on the new 1080P VOD, at least demonstrated with the "single sample of IAL". Somewhat premature to jump to those conclusions. Time will bear it out.

So here's how I see it. Some can do the $$ and enjoy the 1080P VOD (although you and others may question the wisdom when perhaps they can rent the Blu-Ray Disc, a valid point there, but some may not be in an easy rental locall such as a majority of the "rural America") and others can ignore it.

Now if a there is a petition thread to DIsh to reduce the compression on the Live TV HD threads, I'll certainly sign onto that. I get your point there.

RockinHARD26 said:

... I even stopped recording the Olympics because of the 3am resets...

Click to expand...

???

You can change the update time to something more convenient for you.