Social Feed
Hi all
this is my first post (yeih!)
We are setting a streaming center in Tennessee and will be streaming some 6
FTA channels. For these we are thinking of getting some 6 PCI DVB-S cards.
We are non-profit, so we try to keep our costs to the minimum.
I have a couple of questions and I am sure some of you have answers (you've been there before, done that before...)
The questions:
1) We have several 2.4 Ghz PCs with 512 Mb RAM (Windows based). The PC(s) will be receiving the signal via PCI DVB-S cards and encode it with locally installed software (adobe flash media live encoder). I wonder how PCU and memory intensive is the simultaneous use of say 2-4 PCI DBV-S cards (on one PC). Has anyone any idea?
2) Any other potential problems you see with this approach (as opposed to using, for example, USB DVB-S Receivers)? The PCs will work 24hx7.
3) Also I was thinking of purchasing generic (no namers) cards from Hong Kong, any opinion on making 2-4 PCI GENERIC cards work simultaneously? I have seen that there are issues with PCI cards of different brands: with drivers, combination of different brands, using different TV viewing software, etc.
But most of the threads I've read have to do with watching simultaneously or watching and recording different channels simultaneously. We are just encoding different channels simultaneously.
I thank you in advance for your answers.
this is my first post (yeih!)
We are setting a streaming center in Tennessee and will be streaming some 6
FTA channels. For these we are thinking of getting some 6 PCI DVB-S cards.
We are non-profit, so we try to keep our costs to the minimum.
I have a couple of questions and I am sure some of you have answers (you've been there before, done that before...)
The questions:
1) We have several 2.4 Ghz PCs with 512 Mb RAM (Windows based). The PC(s) will be receiving the signal via PCI DVB-S cards and encode it with locally installed software (adobe flash media live encoder). I wonder how PCU and memory intensive is the simultaneous use of say 2-4 PCI DBV-S cards (on one PC). Has anyone any idea?
2) Any other potential problems you see with this approach (as opposed to using, for example, USB DVB-S Receivers)? The PCs will work 24hx7.
3) Also I was thinking of purchasing generic (no namers) cards from Hong Kong, any opinion on making 2-4 PCI GENERIC cards work simultaneously? I have seen that there are issues with PCI cards of different brands: with drivers, combination of different brands, using different TV viewing software, etc.
But most of the threads I've read have to do with watching simultaneously or watching and recording different channels simultaneously. We are just encoding different channels simultaneously.
I thank you in advance for your answers.
24 Replies
·
6733 views
dan0el
Did you research the issue of using a PC's GRAPHICS CARD for video encoding? What did Adobe support suggest you about it? The idea is to offload repetitive massive calculations required for signal encoding to a specialized processor designed for that very purpose.
Many PCs have stand along graphics cards, others have graphics chipsets on their MoBo. You can buy an adequate graphics card for this task for cheap, provided you know what model and how to make it work for this task.
Did you research the issue of using a PC's GRAPHICS CARD for video encoding? What did Adobe support suggest you about it? The idea is to offload repetitive massive calculations required for signal encoding to a specialized processor designed for that very purpose.
Many PCs have stand along graphics cards, others have graphics chipsets on their MoBo. You can buy an adequate graphics card for this task for cheap, provided you know what model and how to make it work for this task.
D
Thanks Zamar23 for your input. Actually the Flash Live Media Encoder is really designed to work with live video input (your webcam or professional cameras) as a source. This "live input" can be a TV signal "imported" through a TV-in Card, and I would have hoped it could also be a TV signal "imported" through a DVB-S2 card.
I am not sure as to why Adobe has limited their software this way. Other encoders (for windows media video) can take MPEG2 as a format (for eg). However at the time of this writing, this seems not to be a common feature for either software encoders or hardware encoders for Flash format. They are all geared to taking a live feed (i.e. input from real video cameras).
Industry is moving towards integrating flash better with TV signals and it is widely hoped that with the new flash player (flash 10.1) a superior integration will be achieved.
With regards to doing "encoding" with a graphics card, I am not sure I understand your point. We receive the signal via satellite and then need to "process" it to make it available to the streaming server for distribution to the world. This "processing" is done with the Flash Live Media Encoder (freely downloadable via Adobe).
The inherent limit of this sofware is that it accepts only "raw video", posing a potential problem with usage with DVB-S2 cards (if these cards transform incoming signal into something else than raw video). However, at this stage, it is too early for me to say whether it will work or not. We really have to try on our end and see if we can make it work with a DVB-S2 card. It all depends on whether the software will accept the DVB-S2 card as a source for video input.
It might (I hope!), and whatever the outcome, I'll be glad to post it here.
dan0el
Did you research the issue of using a PC's GRAPHICS CARD for video encoding? What did Adobe support suggest you about it? The idea is to offload repetitive massive calculations required for signal encoding to a specialized processor designed for that very purpose.
Thanks Zamar23 for your input. Actually the Flash Live Media Encoder is really designed to work with live video input (your webcam or professional cameras) as a source. This "live input" can be a TV signal "imported" through a TV-in Card, and I would have hoped it could also be a TV signal "imported" through a DVB-S2 card.
I am not sure as to why Adobe has limited their software this way. Other encoders (for windows media video) can take MPEG2 as a format (for eg). However at the time of this writing, this seems not to be a common feature for either software encoders or hardware encoders for Flash format. They are all geared to taking a live feed (i.e. input from real video cameras).
Industry is moving towards integrating flash better with TV signals and it is widely hoped that with the new flash player (flash 10.1) a superior integration will be achieved.
With regards to doing "encoding" with a graphics card, I am not sure I understand your point. We receive the signal via satellite and then need to "process" it to make it available to the streaming server for distribution to the world. This "processing" is done with the Flash Live Media Encoder (freely downloadable via Adobe).
The inherent limit of this sofware is that it accepts only "raw video", posing a potential problem with usage with DVB-S2 cards (if these cards transform incoming signal into something else than raw video). However, at this stage, it is too early for me to say whether it will work or not. We really have to try on our end and see if we can make it work with a DVB-S2 card. It all depends on whether the software will accept the DVB-S2 card as a source for video input.
It might (I hope!), and whatever the outcome, I'll be glad to post it here.
......
With regards to the DVB-S2 card, I am not sure as to what to expect. With the TV-in cards, we've had no problem at all, they were very quiet on resources. My guess at this stage is that if we gear up the hardware for the Flash Media Live Encoder. This should also cover the DVB-S2 card. But we will see.
I don't understand at all what you're trying to do, or how your software works, however I sense a bit of mis-communication in what I see above.
Most DVB-S or DVB-S2 cards don't transform the signal into any kind of video at all. That is usually up to the software that you run. The card doesn't even know if it IS video or if it's some other kind of data. Some of the cards are not even intended to be used for video. Also, whether the card is DVB or DVB-S2, or a digital TV card doesn't really matter much with respect to the video signals that your computer will see from it, it is only important relative to the card's ability to lock onto the sat signal.
There are programs that will grab the video on the sat signal, and make it available to programs via streaming, or by other methods. However sat signals are not in any standard format, and to extract video from the card, your program would not only have to be capable of receiving video from the card, but would also have to be able to communicate with the card to specify which PIDs the audio and video are being carried , and what frequency and SR and FEC and other values that the sat signal is using.
It is not very CPU intensive to have multiple cards on a computer, I have 2 DVB-S cards and a DVB-S2 card, and used to have a TV card, and could use them all at the same time, however displaying video on the computer IS CPU intensive, particularly if it's HD. If you're streaming SD A/V data through the network and not trying to display it on the computer with the cards, then the 2.4 GHz computer should be fast enough for several cards, and there are programs you can buy that will allow you to address multiple cards of the same type via their MAC addresses. I use different model cards, so I didn't need this feature, and I can grab data from all the cards.
I don't have a clue relative to what format your program needs the video to be in, or what they mean by "raw video",. It may be some type of transport stream or program stream. If it is, then I'm guessing that you can probably use something like TSREADER , or a TSREADER/VLC combination to stream to it, but it's also possible that by raw video, they might be referring to an old analog NTSC signal, in which case, DVB-S or DVB-S2 cards won't be of use.
The fact that you're limiting yourself to using one specific program I think limits you somewhat, and perhaps you should be asking your questions at a forum devoted to that software, rather than in a forum with people who don't use your software. Once you find out what format it needs it's data, and/or what cards it's compatable with, then the people here can be of more help I think.
D
Caraboolee -- thank you for your interest -- we are in the process of mounting the structure, but since we lost the person who did this for us, I am waiting for the next person, so this might take a couple of months still.
I'm having trouble finding a for sure answer on this. When I first started diving back into satellite stuff I noticed the GT Media V8 Finder2 which looks pretty cool and relatively low price point. But I can't find an answer, seems like some people (and Amazon's own AI guesser-bot) say it doesn't support motors.
The manual itself (the PDF that I found is named 20220718043903GTMEDIAV8FINDER2.pdf and it's on page 6 of 8) does show on the installation screen a "Motor Setup" menu item and says "If select DiSEqC1.2 or USALS, we can press ◀︎▶︎ to select IF Channel, and use number key to input Center Frequency."
Which…… the USALS part seems promising, but I don't know what IF and Center frequencies have to do with anything? Can it drive the motor off its battery for one, and does it have options for e.g. using the ◀︎▶︎ arrows to change the aim and save adjustments?
The closest I've found to real-world experience here is in Long shot with TBS6909X card where someone is talking about a different rotor and says:
> when I connect my V8 Finder 2, it immediately moves the dish if it's not in the correct position
which seems really promising! Moving the dish is what I'm after here, with something newer than the old MPEG-2 receiver I have now. Even for other receivers its really unclear if motor support is just pretty much a safe assumption that they don't even mention it anymore?
The V9 Prime actually looks pretty nice too and assuming it runs motors maybe that'd be better than the V8 Finder 2 for actual long term use since it has networking. But I'm having trouble finding listings for it (and actually most other receivers I see mentioned here) on Amazon or eBay or even Aliexpress. I'm wanting a DVB-S2 receiver for at least MPEG-4 with H.264/AVC and maybe should just get H.265/HEVC while I'm shopping. Main criteria:
* run my "Goto X"-era SG-2100 rotator
* be able to view most/all modern FTA satellites
* ideally a scheduled DVR feature and/or network would make it more useful
* I don't mind if it has… "alternative" firmwares or features but just for broader compatibility/interest
My main goal is I guess just exploration, seeing what's up there. Honestly not a big TV guy and definitely not into infomercials but if I can time shift the occasional Bob Ross or Mr. Rogers Neighborhood, or catch some world events as they're being uplinked, that sort of thing might be interesting. (Honestly main goal started out as weather satellites but this is kinda a warmup excercise for what will likely be a separate setup due to the frequencies.)
My dish is kinda far from my house and even farther from my "radio shack" so if I could just run a PoE ethernet line to something in a box below the dish, or a coax only to the crawlspace where I have 110V but either way would need it full remote including changing between satellites. To avoid having to buy and pull tons more coax up and down through the house. I'm into open source and real standards, so I'd much rather something that I can say use with VLC or go2rtc via a raw IP address and protocol rather than some convenient but proprietary iOS cloud app thingy.
The manual itself (the PDF that I found is named 20220718043903GTMEDIAV8FINDER2.pdf and it's on page 6 of 8) does show on the installation screen a "Motor Setup" menu item and says "If select DiSEqC1.2 or USALS, we can press ◀︎▶︎ to select IF Channel, and use number key to input Center Frequency."
Which…… the USALS part seems promising, but I don't know what IF and Center frequencies have to do with anything? Can it drive the motor off its battery for one, and does it have options for e.g. using the ◀︎▶︎ arrows to change the aim and save adjustments?
The closest I've found to real-world experience here is in Long shot with TBS6909X card where someone is talking about a different rotor and says:
> when I connect my V8 Finder 2, it immediately moves the dish if it's not in the correct position
which seems really promising! Moving the dish is what I'm after here, with something newer than the old MPEG-2 receiver I have now. Even for other receivers its really unclear if motor support is just pretty much a safe assumption that they don't even mention it anymore?
The V9 Prime actually looks pretty nice too and assuming it runs motors maybe that'd be better than the V8 Finder 2 for actual long term use since it has networking. But I'm having trouble finding listings for it (and actually most other receivers I see mentioned here) on Amazon or eBay or even Aliexpress. I'm wanting a DVB-S2 receiver for at least MPEG-4 with H.264/AVC and maybe should just get H.265/HEVC while I'm shopping. Main criteria:
* run my "Goto X"-era SG-2100 rotator
* be able to view most/all modern FTA satellites
* ideally a scheduled DVR feature and/or network would make it more useful
* I don't mind if it has… "alternative" firmwares or features but just for broader compatibility/interest
My main goal is I guess just exploration, seeing what's up there. Honestly not a big TV guy and definitely not into infomercials but if I can time shift the occasional Bob Ross or Mr. Rogers Neighborhood, or catch some world events as they're being uplinked, that sort of thing might be interesting. (Honestly main goal started out as weather satellites but this is kinda a warmup excercise for what will likely be a separate setup due to the frequencies.)
My dish is kinda far from my house and even farther from my "radio shack" so if I could just run a PoE ethernet line to something in a box below the dish, or a coax only to the crawlspace where I have 110V but either way would need it full remote including changing between satellites. To avoid having to buy and pull tons more coax up and down through the house. I'm into open source and real standards, so I'd much rather something that I can say use with VLC or go2rtc via a raw IP address and protocol rather than some convenient but proprietary iOS cloud app thingy.
3 Replies
·
108 views
Thanks, great tips and yeah when I'd read how the H/V bias worked I wondered if the higher voltage was ever useful for better power transfer
It was perhaps slightly impulsive (though I guess not too late to cancel) but instead of the Finder unit I ended up going for kinda the opposite: a completely faceless USB tuner box (TBS5930) which should have RF support all the way up through DVB-S2X. If I'm understanding correctly the actual video/audio will then be whatever I can get software/GPU support for so my hope is that any unencrypted MPEG-2/AVC/HEVC feed can be viewed with VLC or whatnot. As well as access to what I assume is pure data like the Blockstream stuff just for example. (They had a lot of good resources for reception of their own signal in lots of various interesting ways and is kinda how I found the TBS options.)
And I think I will be able to control DiSEqC stuff through Linux including motor commands. So the idea is kinda what I mentioned, hoping this can just get chained in to an old thin client PC or if there's any Raspberry Pi that doesn't cost triple digits these days, somewhere physically convenient and then run it all over LAN from my laptop.
All this is somewhat theoretical of course based on what I'm piecing together but at a certain point I usually have to close all the browser tabs and just commit to try *something* that looks promising and go from there.
It was perhaps slightly impulsive (though I guess not too late to cancel) but instead of the Finder unit I ended up going for kinda the opposite: a completely faceless USB tuner box (TBS5930) which should have RF support all the way up through DVB-S2X. If I'm understanding correctly the actual video/audio will then be whatever I can get software/GPU support for so my hope is that any unencrypted MPEG-2/AVC/HEVC feed can be viewed with VLC or whatnot. As well as access to what I assume is pure data like the Blockstream stuff just for example. (They had a lot of good resources for reception of their own signal in lots of various interesting ways and is kinda how I found the TBS options.)
And I think I will be able to control DiSEqC stuff through Linux including motor commands. So the idea is kinda what I mentioned, hoping this can just get chained in to an old thin client PC or if there's any Raspberry Pi that doesn't cost triple digits these days, somewhere physically convenient and then run it all over LAN from my laptop.
All this is somewhat theoretical of course based on what I'm piecing together but at a certain point I usually have to close all the browser tabs and just commit to try *something* that looks promising and go from there.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VVvKL573guE
Direct YouTube Link - AI That Learns YOU!
Jensen Huang Loves It! #shorts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VVvKL573guE
Direct YouTube Link - AI That Learns YOU!
Jensen Huang Loves It! #shortsTWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
0 Replies
·
0 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ctuZx2SesL0
Direct YouTube Link - AI Worm: The Unstoppable Cybersecurity Threat Explained #shorts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ctuZx2SesL0
Direct YouTube Link - AI Worm: The Unstoppable Cybersecurity Threat Explained #shorts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
0 Replies
·
0 views
Lon.TV
Time for another AWESOME video from Lon Seidman of LON.TV!
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZX9ePUKo00
Direct YouTube Link - Let's Talk About Windows 11's Bloated Notepad and a Fix!
The Official LON.TV Website
Lon on Facebook
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZX9ePUKo00
Direct YouTube Link - Let's Talk About Windows 11's Bloated Notepad and a Fix!
The Official LON.TV Website
Lon on Facebook
0 Replies
·
1 views
Mexico takes on South Africa to open the World Cup Final (it is called the Final... this just isn't the World Cup Final... Final). The tournament has been plagued with rife malfeasance as FIFA has been committing all sorts of fraud with the ticket sales. Hotel rooms have gone unfilled as the prices to attend a game and stay somewhere are through the roof. I swear this is impacting Mansfield, OH hotel rates which are higher than average for the Indycar race. And there is a broadening VAR presence which will ruin things as nothing worse now when scoring a goal and knowing you can't quite celebrate yet as they check to see if a player was offside by a pixel a half-hour ago.
The Group Stage used to mean something, but now 32 of the 48... yeah, 48 teams are going to the Knockout Round. Getting into the Knockout Round used to be a big deal, even for the US. But now... if you don't lose all of your group stage games, you get to move on. Oi! And this is avoiding all the political stuff!
I have never been so unexcited for a World Cup before. Every game used to matter. But FIFA be darned if they don't try to squeeze out every dime they can out of the players, refs, and fans.
The Group Stage used to mean something, but now 32 of the 48... yeah, 48 teams are going to the Knockout Round. Getting into the Knockout Round used to be a big deal, even for the US. But now... if you don't lose all of your group stage games, you get to move on. Oi! And this is avoiding all the political stuff!
I have never been so unexcited for a World Cup before. Every game used to matter. But FIFA be darned if they don't try to squeeze out every dime they can out of the players, refs, and fans.
1 Replies
·
16 views
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
I was reading this article
thehill.com
That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.
And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.
Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.
There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.
In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.
Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.
Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.
So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households
So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.
That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.
But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.
Imagine what 2024 will be like.
Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022
The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…
thehill.com
That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.
And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.
Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.
There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.
In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.
Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.
Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.
So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households
So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.
That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.
But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.
Imagine what 2024 will be like.
821 Replies
·
69355 views
Comcast Corporation, one of the largest telecommunications and media conglomerates in the United States, has shed more than 13 million pay-TV subscribers since reaching its zenith in the late 2000s. The company's video subscriber base, which includes traditional cable television services, stood at approximately 24.2 million customers toward the end of 2008. By the close of the first quarter of 2026, that figure had plummeted to roughly10.95 million, representing a loss of about 13.25 million subscribers, or more than half of its historical peak.
cordcuttersnews.com
Comcast Has Lost Over 13 Million TV Subscribers Since It Peaked Back in 2008 - A Look Back At This Historic Fall That Saw It Lose More Than Half of Its TV Subscribers | Cord Cutters News
Comcast Corporation, one of the largest telecommunications and media conglomerates in the United States, has shed more than 13 million pay-TV subscribers since reaching its zenith in the late 2000s. The company’s video subscriber base, which includes traditional cable television services, stood...
cordcuttersnews.com
Comcast Corporation, one of the largest telecommunications and media conglomerates in the United States, has shed more than 13 million pay-TV subscribers since reaching its zenith in the late 2000s. The company's video subscriber base, which includes traditional cable television services, stood at approximately 24.2 million customers toward the end of 2008. By the close of the first quarter of 2026, that figure had plummeted to roughly10.95 million, representing a loss of about 13.25 million subscribers, or more than half of its historical peak.
Comcast Has Lost Over 13 Million TV Subscribers Since It Peaked Back in 2008 - A Look Back At This Historic Fall That Saw It Lose More Than Half of Its TV Subscribers | Cord Cutters News
Comcast Corporation, one of the largest telecommunications and media conglomerates in the United States, has shed more than 13 million pay-TV subscribers since reaching its zenith in the late 2000s. The company’s video subscriber base, which includes traditional cable television services, stood...
Couldn't happen to a nicer company!
The average monthly cost of cable television in the United States has climbed to $147, marking a significant increase that reflects broader trends in media consumption and rising operational expenses for providers. This figure represents the baseline expense for standard television packages across major cable operators, excluding additional fees for premium channels, equipment rentals, or taxes that often push household bills even higher.
This is without Broadband services ( bundled), also, paying a lot more for a lot less new scripted content and now….sports.
cordcuttersnews.com
This is without Broadband services ( bundled), also, paying a lot more for a lot less new scripted content and now….sports.
The Cost of Cable TV Has Jumped Almost 55% Over the Last 10 Years | Cord Cutters News
The average monthly cost of cable television in the United States has climbed to $147, marking a significant increase that reflects broader trends in media consumption and rising operational expenses for providers. This figure represents the baseline expense for standard television packages...
cordcuttersnews.com
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Anybody been following the Tournaments? I've been watching all weekend on the various ESPN's...
1129 Replies
·
100785 views
Last weekend I got in on a MLB game top of the 8th 1-1, first thought was extra innings... 
and it actually went extra after the 9th.
Catching a little of the AUSL, something to watch when I can't get into anything else.
and it actually went extra after the 9th. Catching a little of the AUSL, something to watch when I can't get into anything else.
Wasn't there a law passed a long time back mandating service providers level the sound from one ch. to the next? Or was that just for within any single given ch., and not letting commercials be boosted? Regardless it's a pain on DiSH with some ch's way louder than others, and having to jockey the sound up & down. Is there some fix? Can some TVs compensate for this?
11 Replies
·
691 views
maybe he should post his gear so we could look into it
.. t.v. soundbars AVR whatever he's running.. our home theater has volume leveling but so does our soundbar in the bedroom
T
Most stuff has all this volume leveling, almost all them dont work the way should or advertised as. maybe "ai" versions of volume level will work closer to way we would like to which make all channels and inputs same defualt sound level, including commercials
There is reason my entire mp3/audio music collection on my pc was changed to have same defualt "dB" for all files via something like MP3Gain so there all same defualt volume level and there for I never have to play around with my volume. I know Winamp could change dB defualts but never worked as good as just manual changing all the audio/mp3/music collection files to just be all the same
maybe he should post his gear so we could look into it
Most stuff has all this volume leveling, almost all them dont work the way should or advertised as. maybe "ai" versions of volume level will work closer to way we would like to which make all channels and inputs same defualt sound level, including commercials
There is reason my entire mp3/audio music collection on my pc was changed to have same defualt "dB" for all files via something like MP3Gain so there all same defualt volume level and there for I never have to play around with my volume. I know Winamp could change dB defualts but never worked as good as just manual changing all the audio/mp3/music collection files to just be all the same
S
That's a fundamental issue with volume levels - it's not just that people want some "level" but that the material itself can demand (or at least so says the creator) a wide dynamic range or a smaller one. ie: do you boost the typical conversations upward and use most of your range just for voices? Or do you leave room for the explosions and jet engines. Creators and viewer/listeners all vary in their priorities, and most volume-leveling products are trying to do things in real time so they have very little context to work with. Even when using a tool that reads a whole file and displays a peak volume, you can wonder how often such a volume occurs and then you can disagree on how important it is for something like an explosion to have any clipping/distortion.
I think the OP refers to the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, AKA the CALM act. But as the name suggests, I think it only has to do with commercials and not different sources.
By the way, if you watch westerns with realistic gunshot sound levels, I recommend hearing protection.
I think the OP refers to the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, AKA the CALM act. But as the name suggests, I think it only has to do with commercials and not different sources.
By the way, if you watch westerns with realistic gunshot sound levels, I recommend hearing protection.
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Cutting Edge
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!
So let the game continue!
The last song was added by Bobby who posted...
One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters
CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!
Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game
Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.
Example:
Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow
Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio
Another example:
Ride the Lightning -- Metallica
Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne
Get it?
An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
So let the game continue!
The last song was added by Bobby who posted...
One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters
CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!
Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game
Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.
Example:
Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow
Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio
Another example:
Ride the Lightning -- Metallica
Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne
Get it?
An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
67108 Replies
·
2662323 views
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
This is a thread that will keep you apprised of 4K events that will be showing on Dish channel 540. Keep looking here for information.
As of today, 9-27-17, there are no scheduled events posted for the next 2 weeks. That is subject to change on a daily basis.
As of today, 9-27-17, there are no scheduled events posted for the next 2 weeks. That is subject to change on a daily basis.
699 Replies
·
164672 views