Social Feed

Main Feed My Feed
nrholland
nrholland
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

POSSIBLE DISTANT NETS FROM DISH

If the SHVERA acts goes thru as planned, will Dish be able to provide distant nets again? Likely, I would imagine they would be from New York and L.A. like they were before (I would prefer Buffalo or Atlanta and Seattle).

If they are able to do that again, what will become of AAD? Or will dish just let AAD do the distant nets as they have been doing it and let them take care of that portion of the programming?
Read more
18 Replies · 3393 views
Load Replies (18) Reply Legacy View
M
Mr Tony
Right now DIsh cant import stations into markets that dont have the network.

If they could, places like Mankato, MN that only has CBS in the DMA Dish could import the Mpls loclas like DIrectV does
Read more
Reply
T
TigerpounceTN
Iceberg said:
Right now DIsh cant import stations into markets that dont have the network.

If they could, places like Mankato, MN that only has CBS in the DMA Dish could import the Mpls loclas like DIrectV does
Click to expand...


Why can DirecTV do it but Dish can't?
Read more
Reply
M
Mr Tony
Dish lost a lawsuit...damn...4 years ago this December If I remember right

basically they were giving distants to folks who didnt technically qualify for them. A long time ago the rule was pretty simple...locals available? no distants allowed. But Dish still sold distants to folks who might have qualified. Technically I was one of them. I qualified for all locals but CBS but Minneapolis locals were available. SO for a long time I had both Minneapolis locals and distants except for CBS. Had Fox from Denver & LA, NBC from NY & Denver and ABC from Denver & Atlanta (If I remember right)

so they lost a lawsuit and had to take distants away to EVERYONE who had them...even folks who legit qualified for them.
Read more
Reply
D
DishSubLA
. . . And Dish and all the major nets were set and ready with a settlement to that suit where Dish was to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the big nets in exchange for continuing to provide Distant Nets to its subscribers--all but ONE major net, that is. Can you guess which one? Well, here is a hint: Rupert Murdoch. Yes, at that time Rupert Murdoch owned both the Fox television network and . . . Direc TV. All the other nets wanted this deal, but the settlement had to be to the agreement of all the nets. Rupert was not about to allow a settlement that would take away his Direc TV's advantage over Dish. This is exactly why the govt. should have never allowed media companies to own both content providers/channels and TV services such as cable, FiOS Uverse and satellite. Oh, and don't forget that AT&T won't let Dish Sling on its 3G network, but will on WiFi, and AT&T just happens to be a competitor to Dish and will have its own "TV to go" solution. Wanna bet AT&T let's its Uverse subs use AT&T's 3G network?

Now, if you disagree with that opinion, then consider the possible Comcast NBC/Universal merger with Comcast on top. This is a very bad deal for consumers. Comcasts leverage will be unprecedented and already has a practice of denying competitors access to content it produces in the form of sports channels. If the Dems allow this take-over to occur, then everyone in D.C. really is corrupt to the highest degree. Also, it would create a company "too big to fail." Remember Chrysler corporation? No U.S. President is going to let a troubled Comcast/NBC/Universal go out of business with the massive loss of jobs should that occur anytime in the future. More $$$ to the biggest corporations.
Read more
Reply
G
Greg Bimson
DishSubLA said:
. . . And Dish and all the major nets were set and ready with a settlement to that suit where Dish was to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the big nets in exchange for continuing to provide Distant Nets to its subscribers--all but ONE major net, that is. Can you guess which one? Well, here is a hint: Rupert Murdoch. Yes, at that time Rupert Murdoch owned both the Fox television network and . . . Direc TV.
Click to expand...
So far correct, but then...
DishSubLA said:
All the other nets wanted this deal, but the settlement had to be to the agreement of all the nets.
Click to expand...
A settlement was never part of the problem. One needs to go back to the timeline:
In May, the 11th Circuit ruled for the broadcasters, sending the case back to Dimitrouleas with orders to ban EchoStar's access to the copyright license needed to distribute distant-network signals.

In August, EchoStar settled with all parties, except Fox stations owned by News Corp. Among other things, EchoStar agreed to pay the stations $100 million and ramp up local station service from 165 to 175 markets by Dec. 31.​
The 11th Circuit told Judge Dimitrouleas to enter a permanent injunction banning use of the copyright license. Judge Dimitrouleas only did what his superiors told him he must do. Just because a settlement was reached didn't alter the fact that Judge Dimitrouleas was told to enter the injunction. Judge Dimitrouleas even alluded to the fact that all parties could have settled yet he was mandated by his superiors to enter the injunction.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (18)
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

Will the iPhone Duo fit in a pocket?

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cptJK6wlKJY


Direct YouTube Link - Will the iPhone Duo fit in a pocket?
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 0 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Tech News Weekly 460

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0_HFoQcM7U


Direct YouTube Link - Tech News Weekly 460
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 0 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Bruce
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

thehill.com

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…
thehill.com thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
Read more
875 Replies · 71304 views
Load Replies (875) Reply Legacy View
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
My 26 year old son doesn't want to use traditional sat or cable now and only uses streaming apps and he is not on them as much as we were with satellite, using it for back ground noise while we do other things around the house. He doesn't even care about antenna ota TV either. Mind you he had a satellite receiver in his room since he was born and didn't want one after he got to be a teenager. So I took it out. I mainly used it to load up kid shows on the Dvr , so he would be entertained while I was doing stuff around the house when he was a baby and toddler. So Gen Z will not care one bit about live TV services going the way of the Dodo bird.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dishdude
Bruce
Bruce
Some interesting information was in this article-

www.lightreading.com

50M subs might be the 'floor' for US pay-TV

Fifty million-plus subs could serve as the 'floor' for US pay-TV by 2030, reckons MoffettNathanson.
www.lightreading.com

This first-

The total pay-TV sector (traditional service providers and virtual MVPDs) shed 885,000 subscribers in Q2 2026

So with the loss of 2.03 Million in the first quarter, already at 2.915 Million gone this year, two quarters left to report.

#2-

The segment ended Q2 with 61.51 million subs comprising 27.5 million cable video subs, 21.42 million vMVPD customers, 9.56 million satellite TV customers, and 3.01 million telco TV subs.

There are approximately 133.97 million households in the United States, according to recent YCharts US Households Data from mid-2026.

That means more than 72 Million households do not have a paid live TV service, about 54% of the total.

What is worse, 7 years ago, paid live TV had over 80% of the population subscribing ( about 100 Million), almost all were Cable/Satellite customers.

Today, only about 37 Million subscribe to Cable/Satellite, less than 28% of our population.

#3-

At one time, Satellite TV (Dish and DirecTV), had about 34 Million subscribers added together, now, 9.56 Million.

That is over a 70% loss for those who subscribe to Satellite TV.

For Cable TV, not as bad, since they have broadband to help against the losses ( bundles), but as more options appear ( 5G, fiber, starlink, etc), I expect a big increase in those leaving cable.

Also expect YTTV to really start gaining even more subscribers, for those who still wish to have a live TV service, based on price point and it is a really great service.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons
Bruce
Bruce
Looks like Optimum Communications ( formerly CableVision) is collapsing, due to it's high debt, lenders/creditors are taking over-

cordcuttersnews.com

The End of Another Major Cable TV Provider? Struggling With Over $21 Billion in Debt As It Has Lost Over Half of All of Its TV Customers As Creditors Are About to Take Over | Cord Cutters News

Optimum Communications is approaching a debt restructuring agreement that would transfer control of the U.S. broadband and cable provider to a group of its primary lenders, according to people familiar with the discussions. The proposed transaction would also resolve ongoing litigation between...
cordcuttersnews.com cordcuttersnews.com
Read more
Reply
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: ncted, MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons
Bruce
Bruce
Sony is discontinuing it's last 4K disc player, Panasonic has been rumored to be doing the same, the end of physical media is unfortunately, about to happen.

cordcuttersnews.com

Bad News For Blu-ray Fans: Sony Has Stopped Making a Popular Player | Cord Cutters News

Sony has discontinued its final standalone UHD Blu-ray player, the UBP-X700/K, ending shipments of the device with no successor model announced. The move, first spotted by Japanese website Kunkoku.jp and confirmed through the status of the product on Sony’s own website, marks the company’s...
cordcuttersnews.com cordcuttersnews.com
Read more
Reply
  • Sad
Reactions: navychop
navychop
navychop
Got a Sony 700 at WM dot commie.

I think.

Ordered, anyway. Amazon let me go thru entire process but then said no inventory.

Hopefully,, WM will come thru.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (875)
dishstaller
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

You can't even trust the cost per ounce info in grocery stores anymore

I'm surprised Walmart hasn't banned this guy from all of their stores. He has been on their CASE the past few months.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f3zr37ekgKM?feature=share
Read more
30 Replies · 289 views
Load Replies (30) Reply Legacy View
  • Wow
Reactions: NYDutch
Juan
Juan
dishstaller said:
I'm surprised Walmart hasn't banned this guy from all of their stores. He has been on their CASE the past few months.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f3zr37ekgKM?feature=share
Click to expand...

When walmart set a price...they weigh the container and the product...the product label only shows the weight of the product...I am sure if you brought your own plastic baggies to bring the product home you could get the cheaper price
Read more
Reply
dishstaller
dishstaller
Juan said:
When walmart set a price...they weigh the container and the product...
Click to expand...
Then they are stupid. Everyone knows that the price per ounce should be the price per ounce of actual product.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
Juan
Juan
dishstaller said:
Then they are stupid. Everyone knows that the price per ounce should be the price per ounce of actual product.
Click to expand...
You are paying for the whole thing
Read more
Reply
T
telstar_1
Juan said:
You are paying for the whole thing
Click to expand...
Well, the bag can't weigh that much, right? But by law food product packaging must display the actual net weight of the product, i.e., the contents of the container, so by any logic, if not law, a store's stated per-ounce cost should reflect that figure. But since there's not any law regulating shelf statements, a store can say whatever it wants without violating any rules. So I guess the answer is more consumer legislation. Or simply caveat emptor.
Read more
Reply
Juan
Juan
telstar_1 said:
Well, the bag can't weigh that much, right? But by law food product packaging must display the actual net weight of the product, i.e., the contents of the container, so by any logic, if not law, a store's stated per-ounce cost should reflect that figure. But since there's not any law regulating shelf statements, a store can say whatever it wants without violating any rules. So I guess the answer is more consumer legislation. Or simply caveat emptor.
Click to expand...
But a box can weigh more than an ounce..maybe 2...a can might weigh 5 ounces..a bag...not much
Read more
Reply
dishstaller
dishstaller
Juan said:
.a bag...not much
Click to expand...
Well, according to the price per ounce on that first bag of coffee he mentions, that would mean the bag weighed over 6 ounces. That bag does NOT weigh 6 ounces. According to Google, an empty bag weighs half an ounce.
Read more
Reply
Juan
Juan
dishstaller said:
Well, according to the price per ounce on that first bag of coffee he mentions, that would mean the bag weighed over 6 ounces. That bag does NOT weigh 6 ounces. According to Google, an empty bag weighs half an ounce.
Click to expand...
You need to weigh the actual bag...a deli bag weighs less than that but a thick coffee bag is gonna weigh around an ounce...an empty tin can has some weight
Read more
Reply
NYDutch
NYDutch
Juan said:
You need to weigh the actual bag...a deli bag weighs less than that but a thick coffee bag is gonna weigh around an ounce...an empty tin can has some weight
Click to expand...
Products sold by the ounce, pound, etc, should always be priced for the product only. Only the shipping weight should include the packaging.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: slow_poke_pete, Bobby and Jimbo
harshness
harshness
NYDutch said:
Products sold by the ounce, pound, etc, should always be priced for the product only.
Click to expand...
Unless the specific product or its packaging is known at the time of weighing, estimating the tare weight for a PoS system is a tall order.

I'm pretty sure that produce bags can't get any thinner. ;)

You certainly don't want to put unbagged produce on a belt, scale, or in a clerk's hands (gloved or not).
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
harshness said:
Unless the specific product or its packaging is known at the time of weighing, estimating the tare weight for a PoS system is a tall order.

I'm pretty sure that produce bags can't get any thinner. ;)

You certainly don't want to put unbagged produce on a belt, scale, or in a clerk's hands (gloved or not).
Click to expand...
I would think that all the packaging would already be accounted for ... they weigh the container, subtract that from the scale, then add the product , so its weighing the Product only
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby, dishstaller and NYDutch
dishstaller
dishstaller
Juan said:
but a thick coffee bag is gonna weigh around an ounce...
Click to expand...

Obviously you didn't read my post.....google says a coffee bag weighs half an ounce. But let's say you are correct and it DOES weigh a full ounce, that would still fall 5 ounces shy for Walmart's numbers to match.
You wouldn't happen to be kin to Bernie would you
Read more
Reply
Juan
Juan
dishstaller said:
Obviously you didn't read my post.....google says a coffee bag weighs half an ounce. But let's say you are correct and it DOES weigh a full ounce, that would still fall 5 ounces shy for Walmart's numbers to match.
You wouldn't happen to be kin to Bernie would you
Click to expand...
None of it means a hill of coffee beans...the price is the price...its not going to get any lower...as long as you pay the price on the shelf at the register..there is no crime
Read more
Reply
dishstaller
dishstaller
Juan said:
None of it means a hill of coffee beans...the price is the price...its not going to get any lower...as long as you pay the price on the shelf at the register..there is no crime
Click to expand...
I can't BELIEVE this is being such a difficult subject. The issue isn't the price....it's the advertised price per ounce. A lot of shoppers, myself included, use the price per ounce in determining which is the better value....with that number being inaccurate, it can trick someone into thinking that one product cost less per ounce than a competing product. Is this a crime?...above my pay grade. Is it dishonest? Yes.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: AZ.
Juan
Juan
dishstaller said:
I can't BELIEVE this is being such a difficult subject. The issue isn't the price....it's the advertised price per ounce. A lot of shoppers, myself included, use the price per ounce in determining which is the better value....with that number being inaccurate, it can trick someone into thinking that one product cost less per ounce than a competing product. Is this a crime?...above my pay grade. Is it dishonest? Yes.
Click to expand...
Again it makes no difference...call the ftc and file a complaint...maybe your lawyer can file a class action lawsuit and you can collect your 25 cents
Read more
Reply
View all replies (30)
Bruce
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

Traditional/Streaming Live TV Providers Losses, 3rd Quarter 2026 Edition

Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

cordcuttersnews.com

Comcast Just Lost 274,000 TV Customers & 144,000 Internet Customers In Just Three Months | Cord Cutters News

Comcast Corporation reported its third-quarter 2026 results on October 22, showing continued erosion in its domestic residential broadband internet and video customer bases as competitive pressures intensified across the connectivity market. The company recorded a net loss of 144,000 domestic...
cordcuttersnews.com cordcuttersnews.com
Read more
4 Replies · 56 views
Load Replies (4) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
dishstaller
dishstaller
Losing 144,000 internet customers surprises me more.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony and Howard Simmons
S
savarese04
dishstaller said:
Losing 144,000 internet customers surprises me more.
Click to expand...
people are moving to fiber, which is better up and down and also not Comcast.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
dishdude
dishdude
savarese04 said:
people are moving to fiber, which is better up and down and also not Comcast.
Click to expand...
dishstaller said:
Losing 144,000 internet customers surprises me more.
Click to expand...

Cord cutting 2.0. Not just fiber, 5G is really taking a toll on the cable companies.
Read more
Reply
AZ.
AZ.
dishdude said:
Cord cutting 2.0. Not just fiber, 5G is really taking a toll on the cable companies.
Click to expand...
I agree, for $35 it aint perfect but just as reliable as my cable was. And that was twice as much and still rising
Read more
Reply
dishstaller
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Country singer John Anderson died today

He was 71 yrs old. One of my favorite songs is Seminole Wind....the violin is killer.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8sh9P3X33w
Read more
9 Replies · 89 views
Load Replies (9) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Mr Tony, RaiderPower, NYDutch and 3 others
M
mikew
I Wish I Could Have Been There is an amazing song. Rest in peace Mr Anderson.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie and dishstaller
dishstaller
dishstaller
mikew said:
I Wish I Could Have Been There is an amazing song.
Click to expand...
That's one of those songs that hits a little too close to home for me. I like the song but just can't listen to it. It's kinda like that song "Daddy never was the Cadillac kind".....reminds me too much of my Grandfather who died Feb 18, 1995.
Read more
Reply
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony and mikew
dfergie
dfergie
R.I.P. I thought he was older…
Read more
Reply
M
Mr Tony
R.I.P.
Got a few songs on my 'setup' (old cell phone with music) that I can listen to while working
Read more
Reply
S
slow_poke_pete
RIP
Read more
Reply
KE4EST
KE4EST
dfergie said:
R.I.P. I thought he was older…
Click to expand...
Same here. I thought he was older......RIP
Read more
Reply
View all replies (9)
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

iPhone 1 vs iPhone Duo!

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_fUiEcLbmr0


Direct YouTube Link - iPhone 1 vs iPhone Duo!
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 5 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
SuperDish_Fan23
SuperDish_Fan23
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Its crazy how the ViP922 is so rare for no reason.

Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!
Read more
25 Replies · 628 views
Load Replies (25) Reply Legacy View
S
Strega
That's not really unusual. Cable companies like to the provide the box too. The phone company provided the phones in until the government forced them to allow third-party phones.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
Almighty1
Strega said:
That's not really unusual. Cable companies like to the provide the box too. The phone company provided the phones in until the government forced them to allow third-party phones.
Click to expand...
Yes, the Western Electric phones that says "Bell System Property, NOT FOR SALE, Western Electric".
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: AZ., Bobby and charlesrshell
Bobby
Bobby
Almighty1 said:
Yes, the Western Electric phones that says "Bell System Property, NOT FOR SALE, Western Electric".
Click to expand...
In my very early work life I installed and repaired those phones.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell, Almighty1, Foxbat and 1 other person
AZ.
AZ.
Almighty1 said:
Yes, the Western Electric phones that says "Bell System Property, NOT FOR SALE, Western Electric".
Click to expand...
someone is showing their age
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: slow_poke_pete, Almighty1 and charlesrshell
Almighty1
Almighty1
AZ. said:
someone is showing their age
Click to expand...
LOL. It depends if the person saw it during the years when they were actually still available which is 1968 to 1983 meaning the person could be 43-58 years old or they can even be a few years old if they learned to read and write at a young age and actually saw a telephone with that label somewhere recently just like even here in San Francisco, payphone still exist physically in public places but whether they can be used or not is a different issue. It still looks like this even today:
1792633296785.webp
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
dishstaller
I opened my Radio Shack in Sept 1984 and right about that time they did the whole deregulation thing with the phone companies. I bought TONS of those phones that had been refurbished with a new outer shell. You could throw one of those out of a 3 story high window and it would still work.
That was an interesting time in history. I would have older customers come in and ask about phones.....they were terrified that they were going to get into trouble hooking up a second phone without the phone company knowing about it. One of the funniest episodes of WKRP was the one where Johnny thought the cops were showing up because they had an unregistered phone. I guess younger folks can't conceive of a time when you were limited to the number of phones you could have in your house....and limited to the length of the cord 🤣
Read more
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Almighty1, navychop and charlesrshell
llokey
llokey
Bobby said:
In my very early work life I installed and repaired those phones.
Click to expand...
And I kept them working through the ESS offices.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and charlesrshell
Bobby
Bobby
llokey said:
And I kept them working through the ESS offices.
Click to expand...
The two central offices in the area I worked were actually step by step offices. :)
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
Almighty1
dishstaller said:
I opened my Radio Shack in Sept 1984 and right about that time they did the whole deregulation thing with the phone companies. I bought TONS of those phones that had been refurbished with a new outer shell. You could throw one of those out of a 3 story high window and it would still work.
That was an interesting time in history. I would have older customers come in and ask about phones.....they were terrified that they were going to get into trouble hooking up a second phone without the phone company knowing about it. One of the funniest episodes of WKRP was the one where Johnny thought the cops were showing up because they had an unregistered phone. I guess younger folks can't conceive of a time when you were limited to the number of phones you could have in your house....and limited to the length of the cord 🤣
Click to expand...
Speaking about cords, I actually did drop a Trimline phone from probably 3 feet high on the floor when I was about 10 or so and it caused a small crack, this was the one with the modular jacks and it was hooked up with I think a 50 ft or longer RJ11C cable from Radio Shack. I still use the phone today connected to a Obi VoIP adapter and the cord is my custom made 6 position RJ11C, not sure of the official name for it without looking it up and Belden MediaTwist Crescent shaped Cat6+ cable.

1792686536450.webp
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
Almighty1 said:
LOL. It depends if the person saw it during the years when they were actually still available which is 1968 to 1983 meaning the person could be 43-58 years old or they can even be a few years old if they learned to read and write at a young age and actually saw a telephone with that label somewhere recently just like even here in San Francisco, payphone still exist physically in public places but whether they can be used or not is a different issue. It still looks like this even today:
View attachment 194957
Click to expand...
so that persons in hiding lol:biggrin
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
slow_poke_pete
remembers when ATT had stores and leased home phones
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
View all replies (25)
Linus Tech Tips
· posted in Linus Tech Tips

There’s a Secret (Better) Netflix for Millionaires

Time for another AWESOME video from Linus Tech Tips!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5SoaRx2TA


Direct YouTube Link - There's a Secret (Better) Netflix for Millionaires
Linus on Facebook
The LTT Store
Read more
0 Replies · 7 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

How AI Is Changing Developer Life

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4qHlGE3NrU


Direct YouTube Link - How AI Is Changing Developer Life
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 6 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Load More
Top
Back