Social Feed

Z
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Greetings, Gang!

I just switched to DISH this summer. I was housesitting, so the installer used the existing dishes on the roof to the 522 receiver. I'm not sure which dishes those were, exactly, but two coaxes came into the house and went to the #1 and #2 inputs on the back of the receiver. I really loved the DVR!

I'm waiting for my house to be built on my property and am living in an RV in the meantime. I'd used DirecTV portably for years without a problem. The dish was mounted on a tripod and it took all of 15 minutes to aim it with the help of the basic $35 analog signal meter. I was told that DISHMover did not support RVs, but I should be able to do this myself.

The installer at the house gave me a DPP dish to use later. I also have a basic twin LNB as an option. "Later" is here, and I'm having problems.:rant:

The RV has an input on the outer wall for a *single* coax. I tried setting up with a single coax cable from LNB connector #1 to the outside connection, then ran a single coax inside to input #1. I was able to get a 60 signal on 119, but couldn't pull in 110. When I tried again, I lost 119 but got 110. When I ran "check switch" the receiver recognized 110 but not 119. About that time my analog signal meter quit - it got no power from the receiver like normal. Now I don't know if that is a receiver problem or something in the meter fried??

I tried the old "open the window and max the volume" trick to hear the onscreen signal meter. Nothing. Then the receiver insisted on changing to either sat 105 or 129 on the signal strength page ALL BY ITSELF, no matter what I changed it back to. I don't have HD.

The first advanced tech rep I talked with said to use the DPP LNB and use a separator just before the receiver so there is input for both #1 and #2. That sounded good and I figured I'd get one Monday after the Xmas holiday.

Then I realized that one feature of having twin inputs to the receiver was being able to record more than just one - especially since I don't have a second TV.

I used the HughesNet dual coax (a mistake?) to run from both outputs on the DPP in through the window straight to inputs #1 and #2 on the receiver. I still couldn't get a signal tuned in, and "check switch" didn't seem to recognize the new configuration. We are talking less than 30 feet, so is line loss a factor?

I recall from somewhere that there is a Catch-22 at work here.....you can't get the onscreen signal meter to work properly unless the "check switch" function is working properly BUT the "check switch" function won't work properly unless it sees a valid signal. SHEESH! Of course, I did the hard off/on thing several times with the receiver, to no avail.

I would like to run two coaxes from the DPP LNB and don't mind doing some new "plumbing" in the RV for it if I can get increased versatility from the 522. All my coaxes were working fine before. I can run another resistance test on all of them again, I suppose.

Can I manually set anything on the "check switch?" Use regular (not satellite TV) coax? I really appreciate any help you can give me. I have just enough knowledge to be scary. ;)

P.S. I just LOVE the RANT smiley!
3 Replies · 1353 views
whatchel1
clear the switch matrix

1st thing you are going to have to do is clear the switch matrix. To do this disconnect the cable to the recvr. Then run the chk switch, next hook both inputs up with the 2 cables and run chk switch again. Then let us know what it shows. How many output ports are on the LNB, are three 2 or 3? What was the question about the HD I don't understand that, are you asking about a hard drive or Hi Def?
T
Greetings, Gang!

I just switched to DISH this summer. I was housesitting, so the installer used the existing dishes on the roof to the 522 receiver. I'm not sure which dishes those were, exactly, but two coaxes came into the house and went to the #1 and #2 inputs on the back of the receiver. I really loved the DVR!

I'm waiting for my house to be built on my property and am living in an RV in the meantime. I'd used DirecTV portably for years without a problem. The dish was mounted on a tripod and it took all of 15 minutes to aim it with the help of the basic $35 analog signal meter. I was told that DISHMover did not support RVs, but I should be able to do this myself.

The installer at the house gave me a DPP dish to use later. I also have a basic twin LNB as an option. "Later" is here, and I'm having problems.:rant:

The RV has an input on the outer wall for a *single* coax. I tried setting up with a single coax cable from LNB connector #1 to the outside connection, then ran a single coax inside to input #1. I was able to get a 60 signal on 119, but couldn't pull in 110. When I tried again, I lost 119 but got 110. When I ran "check switch" the receiver recognized 110 but not 119. About that time my analog signal meter quit - it got no power from the receiver like normal. Now I don't know if that is a receiver problem or something in the meter fried??

I tried the old "open the window and max the volume" trick to hear the onscreen signal meter. Nothing. Then the receiver insisted on changing to either sat 105 or 129 on the signal strength page ALL BY ITSELF, no matter what I changed it back to. I don't have HD.

The first advanced tech rep I talked with said to use the DPP LNB and use a separator just before the receiver so there is input for both #1 and #2. That sounded good and I figured I'd get one Monday after the Xmas holiday.

Then I realized that one feature of having twin inputs to the receiver was being able to record more than just one - especially since I don't have a second TV.

I used the HughesNet dual coax (a mistake?) to run from both outputs on the DPP in through the window straight to inputs #1 and #2 on the receiver. I still couldn't get a signal tuned in, and "check switch" didn't seem to recognize the new configuration. We are talking less than 30 feet, so is line loss a factor?

I recall from somewhere that there is a Catch-22 at work here.....you can't get the onscreen signal meter to work properly unless the "check switch" function is working properly BUT the "check switch" function won't work properly unless it sees a valid signal. SHEESH! Of course, I did the hard off/on thing several times with the receiver, to no avail.

I would like to run two coaxes from the DPP LNB and don't mind doing some new "plumbing" in the RV for it if I can get increased versatility from the 522. All my coaxes were working fine before. I can run another resistance test on all of them again, I suppose.

Can I manually set anything on the "check switch?" Use regular (not satellite TV) coax? I really appreciate any help you can give me. I have just enough knowledge to be scary. ;)

P.S. I just LOVE the RANT smiley!

Okay so I assume you are using the DishPro Plus LNB at the Rv as well; so there are a few things:
1. If you are using the the DPP lnb on the RV, you only need one line plugged into port 1 of the lnb going to the input on the rv. Then once on the inside YOU DO NEED THE SEPARATOR because the 522/625 receivers need both connections(port 1 and 2 on the receiver) to check switch properly.
2. To get the best signal on 110/119, make sure the tripod is plum and your elevation/azimuth settings are correct. Check dishpointer dot com for that info depending on your area. The 110/119 are in the southwest (compass, hello) but I do advise a meter to find these sats if you are going to be moving the dish multiple times a year or even months.
3. You can clear it by running check switch without connections to clear it but it takes forever and does not help you find the signal...you need a meter if you are going to be doing this multiple times.
4. It is possible you might have fried the DPP. I'm not sure how but maybe too much current or an open ground in your RV? You might want to look at that or just your meter went out, I can't tell without looking at it myself.
5. Like I said the dual tuner receivers depend on BOTH INPUTS FROM THE LNB.
6. If I am correct, Hughesnet cable is not approved for dish network equipment. but that will not work if I am correct. If you are using the DPP you only need one line going to the receiver then USING THE SEPARATOR to both inputs.

Hope this info is useful...call back if you need any more info.
Z
Success!

Thanks for your suggestions! I started from scratch and checked the volts DC output on both #1 and #2 on the back of the receiver. 13.3 - good so far.

I checked the HughesNet coax for resistance and everything was 0.00. Ran the coax out the window to bypass any possible internal wiring problems in the RV. Checked vDC again at the end of the coax before attaching them to the LNBs. Still 13.3! Attached the HughesNet dual coax (RG6, 75 ohm resistance, 3000 mHz) to the DPP #1 and #2 LNBs. Ran check switch, and the receiver actually recognized the change in configuration! Finally getting somewhere!

Then I double-checked the mast and discovered a "hit forehead with palm of hand" error. I had been reading the elevation from the center of the adjustment bolt, NOT the correct vertical flange. ( I am REALLY out of practice at this!) :o

I corrected the elevation and covered the 110 with the tinfoil "hat." I did remember to start the azimuth swing several degrees west of where I thought it should be. It was hard to be patient to stop the swing long enough to let the on-screen signal meter catch up, but I did.:angel: Five minutes later I had enough 119 signal to run another check switch and make slight adjustments to get 110. Yeehaa! :eureka

The receiver WAS putting out power to run my analog signal meter and the meter didn't still didn't work. Then the meter is toast, so I'll get another. Hey - it lasted 15 years. $13 is cheap enough......although it would be nice to have the dual analog signal meter for $75. :lick

I mentioned HD (high def) because the receiver kept switching to satellite 129 all by itself on the on-screen signal meter while I was trying to aim the dish. (I think 129 is HD?) I don't need HD.

Now all I need to do is rewire the RV for the dual coax. I won't need it for HughesNet any more. THAT is another tale of woe. :river I fixed THAT with a USB modem.

At least in my quest for satellite knowledge I learned more about "reverse corkscrew diplexing" than any noob should know! :cool:

Thanks again!

Jayne
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68652 Replies · 2680086 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Sweet Miracle - Rush
long_time_Dish
Sweet Baby James - James Taylor
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
ClarkGable
Sweet City Woman - The Stampeders
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
gms49ers
Jet City Woman - Queensryche
FTA4PA
Detroit Rock City - Kiss
R
· posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
0 Replies · 10 views
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 37 views
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
I was reading this article


That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.


Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
897 Replies · 72101 views
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

IMG_2172.webp
Jimbo
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

View attachment 194983
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...

You have services like Hulu Live and You Tube TV that do, what you call Cable, but they ARE Streaming, so Which is is ?

Does it get counted 2x as both Streaming and Cable ?
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Jimbo
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Bruce
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
Jimbo
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Bruce
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Nielsen Streaming Ratings: Third-party measurement firm Nielsen tracks U.S. streaming viewership, releasing weekly reports that measure total minutes viewed across major television sets, broken down by program (such as original, acquired, and movie content) rather than minute-by-minute audience retention curves.
  • Like
Reactions: llokey and Jimbo
S
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.
Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
Jimbo
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.

Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
I have turned some off, not others ...
dishstaller

Funny thing is that as the screen size and pic quality increase, the quality of the programming has DEcreased.
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
174 Replies · 2677 views
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
Y
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Jimbo
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
No, I was actually referring to outside of the Top 8, but should have been Top 12 ...

I guess I should have looked at the bracket from last year first ...

I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
Ronnie-
I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
AZ.
AZ.
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Yep, wonder why we rank the top 25 in 2 poles still? Do the ranking change much if they are unranked or have many loses? They sure do, any given day never take your opponent as a cake walk.....
Jimbo
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time ....however .
You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

They are trying to make this Basketball and its a far cry from the way that is played.

How long till they go to 32 teams ? Then they will say, well, the NFL is 32 teams, we can make more money that way .... except the NFL is 32 teams, that are a set number of teams and divisions, you don't have that in College ... oh but they will try.

They would have to choose what teams they would want in and thats it.
Hopefully that NEVER happens.

I can see the NCAA going away and the CFP taking that portion over and a Collective Bargaining agreement coming in the not to distant future.
  • Haha
Reactions: meStevo
rvvaquero
The problem with rankings and playoffs is that they are designed to hype the game and make money. Period.

The only reason that BYU and Texas Tech were upsets is that they were hyped up in the standings in the first place. I love watching BYU and Bear Bachmeier. They are a fun and talented team, but not nearly so strong, fast, big, and skilled as a true top ten team. Does anyone truly believe they could compete with the likes of Georgia, Ohio State, Indiana, Alabama, etc.? Yet, they were ranked above those teams.

Each year, there are 10 to 12 teams who truly could compete for the championship if it depended on winning more than one game in a playoff. Including teams like James Madison, Tulane, BYU, etc. in a playoff has nothing to do with determining a national champion. It's just about money.
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage and AZ.
Ronnie-
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.


You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

.
But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
  • Like
Reactions: osu1991
Jimbo
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.



But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
No, no ... if you want to make the playoffs, you want to Win it ... If you want to Win it, you need to Win 4-5 games in a row against Top 10 teams for the most part, theres a Possibility you'd play someone out side of the Top 10, but not much.

The Playoffs is a 4-5 game Win or Go Home.