Social Feed

Main Feed My Feed
Shagphil
Shagphil
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info

Between two cities

I live 45 miles from Wilmington NC and 51 miles from Greenville NC. I am almost at mid-point on a direct line between the two. If I point my antenna toward Wilmington, I get those channels great but two of the channels from Greenville fade in and out. If I do the reverse, then the Wilmington channels fade. Is there any way I can put up two antennas pointed in opposite directions and get channels from both sources? The channels #s are different for each city; ie Wilmington is 3,6,10,&20 whereas Greenville is 7,9,12,&14. These are all totally digital now.
Thanks,
shagphil
Read more
4 Replies · 1728 views
Load Replies (4) Reply Legacy View
dodge
dodge
yes you can put up two antennas and you should use a combiner like this one

Winegard Direct.com - Winegard CC 7870 2-Way TV Antenna Joiner Coupler (CC7870) | Winegard [CC-7870] CC 7870 CC-7870 CC7870 CC-7870

just make sure the lengths of the two coaxes from both antennas are the same length that will help in phasing.
Read more
Reply
J
JB Antennaman
The real answer is NO.

Without a real street level address, there is no real way for me to advise you as to which antenna set up you need. But, because some people do not understand virtual channels vs. real channels, the digital mapping of channels might not be the same as the virtual channel numbers that you just described.

UHF suffers from many anomalies such as co channel interference and multipath.

Multipath is where your signal bounces off a nearby object and the signal reaches the tuner in your television multiple times with the same data. In the old days of analog, you would have some ghosting and some static and snow. But with digital, it would be like taking your favorite CD and dropping it in some gumbo mud and then rubbing that mud into the plastic of the CD. Then washing off all the dirt and drying the CD with a clean rag and trying to play that CD in your CD player.

The information on the CD would become corrupt and corrupt information is worse then no information at all.

If you send me your address, I will advise you which antenna / antenna's you need to receive your stations properly and which pre amplifier you will need to compensate for long runs of wire. Depending on where you mount your antenna's and how many ways you split the signals.
Read more
Reply
Jim5506
Jim5506
We have an approximate location, so we can get started.

It looks like you have the following:
Toward Greenville
ABC - 12.1 on channel 12
CBS - 10.1 on channel 9
FOX - 14.1 on channel 47
NBC - 7.1 on channel 32

Toward Wilmington
ABC - 3.1 on channel 46
CBS - ??
FOX - 26.1 on channel 30
NBC - 6.1 on channel 44
I do not see channels 10 and 20 virtual or real toward Wilmington.

I'd get a Winegard 7694 and a rotator or a 7694 toward Greenville and a PR-8800 or other 4 or 8 bay bow tie type UHF antenna toward Wilmington and run seperate cables to your tvs with a/b switches since several of the channels are adjacent frequencies direct combining might cause problems.

It might be interesting to use one of those joiner couplers with two 7694 here to see what happens, they're less than $25.
Read more
Reply
J
JB Antennaman
The problem still is that with UHF, the antenna needs to be pointed in the right direction and using two antenna's would increase the likelyhood of multipath due to the fact that the one antenna would be looking forward, while the other antenna would be looking back. You would need about 8 feet of spacing between the two identical antenna's for the one to reject the image off the other one.

If the antennas were different, such as a XG 91 and a VHF antenna, then the spacing would only have to be about 4 feet. One option that would work would be for the one antenna to be on the one end of the house and mounted 10 feet above the roof and the other antenna to be at the other end of the house and mounted 10 feet above the roof, but then you would have your own little antenna farm and the cost of the two antenna's and the mounts and the wires and the AB switches would be cost prohibitive. It's easier to just mount one really good antenna and use a antenna rotor to turn the antenna then to combine several antenna's pointed in different directions and expect them to work as good as the one really good antenna due to the fact that as the signals gets dragged around by weather, they may or may not always come in - as the weather changes - because unless they were a line of sight signal, the signals might move around as much as 30* from one day to the next and with a UHF signal, 30* might or might not make or break the signal.
Read more
Reply
R
reubenray
· posted in Computers and Gadgets

Laptop Shutting Off When On Battery?

Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
Read more
0 Replies · 3 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Scott Greczkowski
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
Read more
68650 Replies · 2680052 views
Load Replies (68650) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
Throwing It All Away - Genesis
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller and FTA4PA
dishstaller
dishstaller
All I Need is a Miracle - Mike + The Mechanics
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: ClarkGable, long_time_Dish, RaiderPower and 1 other person
gms49ers
gms49ers
Sweet Miracle - Rush
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller and long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
Sweet Baby James - James Taylor
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
ClarkGable
ClarkGable
Sweet City Woman - The Stampeders
Read more
Reply
View all replies (68650)
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee

Macbook PROLED XDR Impressions: They Said They Wouldn't!

Time for another AWESOME video from Marques Brownlee!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2reQut8WNGc


Direct YouTube Link - Macbook PROLED XDR Impressions: They Said They Wouldn't!
The official MKBHD Website!
The MKBHD Store
Read more
0 Replies · 16 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

MacBoo PROLED - What You Need To Know!

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Duq4hKmUE4c


Direct YouTube Link - MacBoo PROLED - What You Need To Know!
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 18 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

MacBook PROLED Nanotexture

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sgr5V8j7c5w


Direct YouTube Link - MacBook PROLED Nanotexture
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 3 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Microsoft's New Round of Employee Buyouts

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbfGWonQfys


Direct YouTube Link - Microsoft's New Round of Employee Buyouts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 15 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Linus Tech Tips
· posted in Linus Tech Tips

Linus was Right - Apple (probably)

Time for another AWESOME video from Linus Tech Tips!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JOW7TTOGfI


Direct YouTube Link - Linus was Right - Apple (probably)
Linus on Facebook
The LTT Store
Read more
0 Replies · 13 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
dishstaller
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

I think we could all use a laugh - Rodney Dangerfield on Carson

Good...simple humor. Enjoy


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJy0WnejlF4
Read more
1 Replies · 31 views
Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View
Jimbo
Bruce
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

thehill.com

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…
thehill.com thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
Read more
897 Replies · 72092 views
Load Replies (897) Reply Legacy View
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
Bruce
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

IMG_2172.webp
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons
Jimbo
Jimbo
Bruce said:
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

View attachment 194983
Click to expand...
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...

You have services like Hulu Live and You Tube TV that do, what you call Cable, but they ARE Streaming, so Which is is ?

Does it get counted 2x as both Streaming and Cable ?
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Jimbo
Jimbo
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Read more
Reply
Bruce
Bruce
Jimbo said:
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Click to expand...
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Bruce said:
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
Click to expand...
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Read more
Reply
Bruce
Bruce
Jimbo said:
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Click to expand...
Nielsen Streaming Ratings: Third-party measurement firm Nielsen tracks U.S. streaming viewership, releasing weekly reports that measure total minutes viewed across major television sets, broken down by program (such as original, acquired, and movie content) rather than minute-by-minute audience retention curves.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: llokey and Jimbo
S
savarese04
Jimbo said:
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...
Click to expand...
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.
Jimbo said:
Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Click to expand...
Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
savarese04 said:
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.

Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
Click to expand...
I have turned some off, not others ...
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
dishstaller
dishstaller
Jimbo said:

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/u4rACh-Tt5k?feature=share
Click to expand...

Funny thing is that as the screen size and pic quality increase, the quality of the programming has DEcreased.
Read more
Reply
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
View all replies (897)
Ramy
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section

2026-27 NCAA College Football

Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
Read more
174 Replies · 2672 views
Load Replies (174) Reply Legacy View
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
Y
Yespage
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Yespage said:
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Click to expand...
No, I was actually referring to outside of the Top 8, but should have been Top 12 ...

I guess I should have looked at the bracket from last year first ...

I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
Read more
Reply
Ronnie-
Ronnie-
Jimbo said:
I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
Click to expand...
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat, osu1991 and AZ.
AZ.
AZ.
Ronnie- said:
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Click to expand...
Yep, wonder why we rank the top 25 in 2 poles still? Do the ranking change much if they are unranked or have many loses? They sure do, any given day never take your opponent as a cake walk.....
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Ronnie- said:
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Click to expand...
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time ....however .
You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

They are trying to make this Basketball and its a far cry from the way that is played.

How long till they go to 32 teams ? Then they will say, well, the NFL is 32 teams, we can make more money that way .... except the NFL is 32 teams, that are a set number of teams and divisions, you don't have that in College ... oh but they will try.

They would have to choose what teams they would want in and thats it.
Hopefully that NEVER happens.

I can see the NCAA going away and the CFP taking that portion over and a Collective Bargaining agreement coming in the not to distant future.
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: meStevo
rvvaquero
rvvaquero
The problem with rankings and playoffs is that they are designed to hype the game and make money. Period.

The only reason that BYU and Texas Tech were upsets is that they were hyped up in the standings in the first place. I love watching BYU and Bear Bachmeier. They are a fun and talented team, but not nearly so strong, fast, big, and skilled as a true top ten team. Does anyone truly believe they could compete with the likes of Georgia, Ohio State, Indiana, Alabama, etc.? Yet, they were ranked above those teams.

Each year, there are 10 to 12 teams who truly could compete for the championship if it depended on winning more than one game in a playoff. Including teams like James Madison, Tulane, BYU, etc. in a playoff has nothing to do with determining a national champion. It's just about money.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage and AZ.
Ronnie-
Ronnie-
Jimbo said:
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time
Click to expand...
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.


Jimbo said:
You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

.
Click to expand...
But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: osu1991
Jimbo
Jimbo
Ronnie- said:
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.



But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
Click to expand...
No, no ... if you want to make the playoffs, you want to Win it ... If you want to Win it, you need to Win 4-5 games in a row against Top 10 teams for the most part, theres a Possibility you'd play someone out side of the Top 10, but not much.

The Playoffs is a 4-5 game Win or Go Home.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (174)
Load More
Top
Back