Social Feed

jlong27

Last reply Mar 10, 2010 · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Motion blur

Why does it occur? I'm pretty sure the problem starts at the source. Some HD is crystal clear while other times it's pretty bad. If the program starts out crystal clear it won't degrade. But if it starts out bad it stays bad and it's really hard to watch.

My local FOX station, when broadcasting network programs, is always really clear. No motion blur. Doesn't matter if it's OTA or Sat, quality is the same.

Just wondering. For reference I have a 622 set to 1080I via HDMI into a Samsung ln52a630.

10 Replies · 2885 views

Load Replies (10) Reply Legacy View

ryotgz

Mar 9, 2010

It also depends on your local station compression. I get OTA from a different location vs. my satellite HD locals. The satellite HD locals blow the OTA out of the water for motion blur (pixelation). At least for my local NBC.

SandFarmer

Mar 9, 2010

ryotgz said:
It also depends on your local station compression. I get OTA from a different location vs. my satellite HD locals. The satellite HD locals blow the OTA out of the water for motion blur (pixelation). At least for my local NBC.

That is so the truth. Especially when resolution is involved:
NBC 1080i
CBS 1080i
CW/Fox 1080i
ABC 720p

The Field Super, please see quote below, that came out to look at my 129 issue, spent two hours switching between OTA Direct, OTA DISH and DISH Locals, saying that he was very appreciative for the opportunity to actually see what I and others had been complaining about in regard to Locals. And at the time there was a dynamic difference between OTA Direct and DISH anything local. We analyzed black density and highlights. Shadows and the lot. OTA Direct won hands down. He supposedly took this info back to DISH and . . . I sent him the link to these forums, of which . . .

"I thank you for the information, especially the link to problems customers have experienced (the link to Satellite Guys). However; I thought about some of the things, and went looking for some answers. It didn't make me very popular, and my job has been eliminated. Today, I am working my last day in this position.

There are a couple of options for me, if I want to stay with Dish. But, I am inclined to look for new adventures elsewhere."

So the good die young at DISH and things don't get fixed. . . .

KAB

Mar 9, 2010

SandFarmer said:
NBC 1080i
CBS 1080i
CW/Fox 1080i
ABC 720p

Fox 720p

dfergie

Mar 9, 2010

Fox is 720p, NBC & CBS look the best for me for football, fox is pretty close... I really can't complain about any of the Satellite provided HD Locals as far as PQ and the CBS & ABC really look stellar OTA (No FOX ava and NBC is passed through SD)

SandFarmer

Mar 9, 2010

KAB said:
Fox 720p

Yup. You're right. I was thinking that CW and Fox have banded together here in Denver. Which created my mistake.

Jim5506

Mar 10, 2010

A 720p transmission OTA can tolerate a 480i subchannel with no visable degradation, but a 1080i channel cannot.

A good 1080i broadcast requires the full 6 MHz bandwidth allotted per channel, otherwise they have to bit starve the picture a bit and you will see a little motion blur when the whole screen changes.

My NBC 1080i has a 480i subchannel and even on very high quality shows like the Tonight Show, when the whole frame changes quickly there is noticable softness in the picture for a half of a second or so.

My CBS station runs 1080i alone and Letterman never exhibits such behavior, but I still don't watch him much.

ripnbigc

Mar 10, 2010

The only channel here that has any motion blur is the local CBS OTA. It is the only one with a subchannel. The Olympics on my local NBC OTA looked stunnning!

Dishlover

Mar 10, 2010

Motion blur is caused by the receiver(TV set). You may be referring to macroblocking. Almost all present sets have motion blur except DLP and CRT. It is because the response times of the plasma/lcd is not fast enough. CRT is about 10 times faster and DLP is about 100 times faster. Motion blur is really only visible on slowly moving things (where the compression doesn't macroblock it), such as a closeup of an actors face that slightly moves. You'll see the resolution really drop off during the movement. Motion blur is present in film and is what makes it look so smooth and lifelike. Film does not macroblock.

View all replies (10)

Scott Greczkowski

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge

Last reply 3 minutes ago · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne

Get it?

An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....

68791 Replies · 2688688 views

Load Replies (68791) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: c-spand

harshness

Today at 10:44 AM

Stay (Just a Little Bit Longer) - Maurice Williams and the Zodiacs

Reactions: long_time_Dish, Bobby and FTA4PA

Bobby

Today at 10:55 AM

Give A Little Bit - Supertramp

Reactions: long_time_Dish and gms49ers

sdfntx

Today at 11:47 AM

Little Bit O' Soul - Music Explosion

gms49ers

Today at 1:02 PM

Soul Man - The Blues Brothers

Reactions: long_time_Dish and FTA4PA

long_time_Dish

3 minutes ago

Heart Full Of Soul - Rush

View all replies (68791)

KAB

Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 5 minutes ago · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Green Dot on WJ4?

Wireless Joey 4. Yesterday, I noticed a little green dot on a small black field in the upper right hand corner of the screen, regardless of channel, recordings, etc. A restart got rid of it, but I am curious as to what It meant and what I did to get it there.

4 Replies · 87 views

Load Replies (4) Reply Legacy View

Redneck_Randy

Today at 8:34 AM

Google Search

The little green dot inside a small black field in the upper right-hand corner of your screen is an Android privacy indicator confirming that the voice remote's microphone is actively listening. Because the Joey 4 runs on an Android

Reactions: charlesrshell

bnewt

Today at 9:16 AM

That's no good

Reactions: KAB and charlesrshell

Almighty1

15 minutes ago

The green dot on Android TV is supposed to show as long as an app or background service is actively using the microphone or camera. [1, 2]

What Normal Behavior Looks Like

- When active: It appears (often with a small microphone or camera icon that fades into a simple green dot) the moment a voice search, assistant command, or streaming app requests audio input.
- When it disappears: It should vanish a few seconds after you finish your command or after the app stops using the microphone. [1]

Why It Might Stay On (Persistent Dot)
If the green dot stays on indefinitely or won't go away, it usually means:

- An app (such as a voice search tool, media player, or background utility) has a hung process or is keeping the microphone channel open.
- A remote control or voice-recognition service is stuck. [1]

How to Fix or Check It

- Restart your TV: Unplug the power cable for about 30 seconds and plug it back in to clear out stuck background apps.
- Check app permissions: Go to your TV's Settings > Privacy or Device Preferences > Microphone to see which apps have access, and revoke permission for any suspicious or unnecessary apps. [1, 2]

Scott Greczkowski

5 minutes ago

Its a bug. I had it happen to mine. The mic is not listening, and if your worried about that remove the batteries from your remote as thats where the mic is.

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

18 minutes ago · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Data Centers Faced a 2026 Ballot Measure Tsunami #shorts

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5WOtjKIoErE

Direct YouTube Link - Data Centers Faced a 2026 Ballot Measure Tsunami #shorts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 4 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

Bobby

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 40 minutes ago · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Dish 4K Event Listings (No Discussion)

This is a thread that will keep you apprised of 4K events that will be showing on Dish channel 540. Keep looking here for information.

As of today, 9-27-17, there are no scheduled events posted for the next 2 weeks. That is subject to change on a daily basis.

772 Replies · 169182 views

Load Replies (772) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: HipKat, bryanw20 and charlesrshell

Bobby

Oct 26, 2026

CFB, Florida vs Georgia, Saturday 10-31, 12:30PM PDT, Channel 148-03.

Reactions: charlesrshell

Bobby

Oct 29, 2026

CFB, Wisconsin at Iowa, Saturday 10-31, 9AM PDT, Channel 148-01.
CFB, Arizona St at BYU, Saturday 10-31, 12:30PM PDT, Channel 148-01.

Reactions: charlesrshell

Bobby

Nov 2, 2026

CFB, Alabama at LSU, Saturday 11-7, 12:30PM PST, Channel 148-03.

Reactions: reubenray and charlesrshell

Bobby

Tuesday at 5:14 PM

CFB, UCLA at Minnesota, Saturday 11-7, 9AM PST, Channel 148-01.
CFB, Iowa at Northwestern, Saturday 11-7, 4:30PM PST, Channel 148-01.

Reactions: charlesrshell

Bobby

40 minutes ago

CFB, Texas at LSU, Saturday 11-14, 4:30PM PST, Channel 148-03.

Reactions: reubenray

View all replies (772)

Linus Tech Tips

48 minutes ago · posted in Linus Tech Tips

Almost literally EVERYONE is wrong about the iPhone Duo

Time for another AWESOME video from Linus Tech Tips!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gro5z03a_Qw

Direct YouTube Link - Almost literally EVERYONE is wrong about the iPhone Duo
Linus on Facebook
The LTT Store

0 Replies · 7 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

48 minutes ago · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

OpenSSH's Wild *sshole Bug Explained!

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBtzS8bbiH0

Direct YouTube Link - OpenSSH's Wild *sshole Bug Explained!
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 5 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

48 minutes ago · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Where Former NASA Director Jim Green Would Like to Explore More Of

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/V8cqDDKjaPg

Direct YouTube Link - Where Former NASA Director Jim Green Would Like to Explore More Of
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 6 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TheForce

Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter

Last reply 55 minutes ago · posted in The Phone & Tablet Zone

Apple Event September 2026

Apple Fall Hardware Event takes place today, September 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:00 p.m. ET. It marks the debut of new CEO John Ternus and the expected reveal of Apple's first foldable phone.

147 Replies · 2706 views

Load Replies (147) Reply Legacy View

TheForce

Yesterday at 10:32 AM

Report on my iphone 18 PM
Working well with about 3-4 days battery life. New BT and Wifi range is much better than the 15 I had. It doesn't seem any faster but probably is. The Camera shooting video has amazing image stabilization.
Only observed issue is once in awhile, the screen loses touch sensitivity and requires a soft reboot and delete the many open apps to fix. This happens about once a week since buying it.

Reactions: Foxbat and comfortably_numb

Foxbat

Today at 9:54 AM

TheForce said:
Only observed issue is once in awhile, the screen loses touch sensitivity and requires a soft reboot and delete the many open apps to fix.

I think your new 18 Pro is fine as this seems to be an iOS 27 bug. My iPhone 17 has similar issues.

Reactions: TheForce

TheForce

Today at 12:53 PM

Foxbat said:
I think your new 18 Pro is fine as this seems to be an iOS 27 bug. My iPhone 17 has similar issues.

My wife hasn't complained about her 17Pro yet.

navychop

Today at 1:01 PM

Shhhh!

Foxbat

Today at 1:15 PM

To be fair, this doesn't happen often. Usually pressing the screen button and unlocking the phone clears it up. There is one site where touch seems to be royally screwed up. But it's more a case of the touch points not matching the targets on screen.

TheForce

55 minutes ago

Foxbat said:
To be fair, this doesn't happen often. Usually pressing the screen button and unlocking the phone clears it up. There is one site where touch seems to be royally screwed up. But it's more a case of the touch points not matching the targets on screen.

The most annoying for me is when I'm trying to teach my robot to edit the mowing map and the touch screen quits and I have to reboot and start all over. As long as I reboot the phone the repeat will usually complete the map and it is saved.

View all replies (147)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Today at 2:14 PM · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…

thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.

911 Replies · 73134 views

Load Replies (911) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Bruce

Today at 5:36 AM

According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

Reactions: Howard Simmons

Jimbo

Today at 8:00 AM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Reactions: Howard Simmons, dishstaller and AZ.

Bruce

Today at 8:17 AM

Jimbo said:
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Reactions: Howard Simmons, ncted, Bobby and 1 other person

AZ.

Today at 8:25 AM

Bruce said:
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need a old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Jimbo

Bruce

Today at 11:08 AM

AZ. said:
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need an old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and AZ.

Bobby

Today at 11:20 AM

Bruce said:
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Foxbat

AZ.

Today at 1:09 PM

Bobby said:
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Reactions: Howard Simmons

TRG

Today at 2:01 PM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish

Bruce

Today at 2:14 PM

AZ. said:
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

View all replies (911)

Ramy

Supporting Founder

Last reply Today at 2:00 PM · posted in The Sports Section

2026-27 NCAA College Football

Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.

194 Replies · 3701 views

Load Replies (194) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Mike0616

Ronnie-

Yesterday at 3:11 PM

The game time was just a product of so many top 25 matchups. I think they said it was the most in one day since the 1930s.

Not everyone can play at night and get a tv slot.

Of course Lane is gonna complain. It's what he does.

Roll tide.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 3:23 PM

Ronnie- said:
The game time was just a product of so many top 25 matchups. I think they said it was the most in one day since the 1930s.

Not everyone can play at night and get a tv slot.

Of course Lane is gonna complain. It's what he does.

Roll tide.

With Streaming, they should all be able to be on at night, no issue with TV slots

(Everybody can be on Peacock ... :argue

)

Ronnie-

Yesterday at 3:28 PM

Jimbo said:
With Streaming, they should all be able to be on at night, no issue with TV slots

(Everybody can be on Peacock ... )

Could. Yes.

But you know as well as I that they are not going A: put all of their prime matchups on at the same time. And B: take their main games off of the main channels.

You had bama vs lsu, and Georgia vs Ole Miss to choose from.

Considering Georgia had beaten Bama and Ole Miss had beaten LSU, I can see that why they chose that game for the night matchup (without the benefit of hindsight as to how the game's Saturday would play out).

You also had Tennessee vs Kentucky to fit in the mix.

Someone had to be at 2:30. Which imo is honestly my preferred slot for bama games no matter who they are playing or where.

None of them was going to be a streaming only game, and none where going on an "alternate" channel.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 3:58 PM

Ronnie- said:
Could. Yes.

But you know as well as I that they are not going A: put all of their prime matchups on at the same time. And B: take their main games off of the main channels.

You had bama vs lsu, and Georgia vs Ole Miss to choose from.

Considering Georgia had beaten Bama and Ole Miss had beaten LSU, I can see that why they chose that game for the night matchup (without the benefit of hindsight as to how the game's Saturday would play out).

You also had Tennessee vs Kentucky to fit in the mix.

Someone had to be at 2:30. Which imo is honestly my preferred slot for bama games no matter who they are playing or where.

None of them was going to be a streaming only game, and none where going on an "alternate" channel.

Of course ... but they Could.

Did you realize how early that Utah vs BYU game was Saturday ... I believe it was 12 Noon EST, they are in Mountain time zone, which means they started thier game a 10 AM.

Ronnie-

Yesterday at 4:20 PM

Jimbo said:
Of course ... but they Could.

Yes. I even said so. But for reasons I gave, they won't. Wouldn't make sense for them too and they would lose money. A lot of these people that watch one of these games, watch more than one.

They want those eyeballs on as many games as possible. It just makes financial sense.

Jimbo said:
Did you realize how early that Utah vs BYU game was Saturday ... I believe it was 12 Noon EST, they are in Mountain time zone, which means they started thier game a 10 AM.

It was early. Sure.

osu1991

Today at 9:12 AM

View: https://youtu.be/tD8_OaxOxRg?si=m_fUTlFsBE3T_5E1

Reactions: Foxbat

Ronnie-

Today at 12:34 PM

College Football Playoff, ESPN agree to 5-year, $1.7 billion deal expanding field to 24 teams starting in 2027

The CFP field will have 12 teams this year, before doubling in 2027.

sports.yahoo.com

ESPN and the College Football Playoff (CFP) have agreed to a 5-year deal to expand the playoff from 12 to 24 teams.

The deal, worth $1.7 billion per ESPN's Heather Dinich, keeps ESPN as the broadcast partner.

The CFP announced the deal on Monday.

Reactions: Jimbo, meStevo, cp2k and 1 other person

cp2k

Today at 1:30 PM

Honestly, I would rather see an expanded bracketed playoff system than the current Conference Championship Game + playoff model we're using right now. The Conference Championships essentially allow two teams to beat up on each other, and then both typically are going to end up in the playoffs anyway unless it is one of the weaker or smaller conferences. Let them play it out on the field against others.

Jimbo

Today at 2:00 PM

cp2k said:
Honestly, I would rather see an expanded bracketed playoff system than the current Conference Championship Game + playoff model we're using right now. The Conference Championships essentially allow two teams to beat up on each other, and then both typically are going to end up in the playoffs anyway unless it is one of the weaker or smaller conferences. Let them play it out on the field against others.

Until the Big Ten changed thier alignment,(a couple years ago) ... it was not like that at all, the East side won most years the west side represented the Big Ten, but they may have been the team with the 4th best record ...
They finally changed that, to a single conference ... but yes, in most cases, both teams will get in ... now, its a certain both will get in ...

The biggest issue with the Conference Now is the Number of TEAMS .... WAY to Many.
It would take 2-3 YEARS to do a round robin where everyone would play one another ... How do you know how good a team is when teams don't play the same teams ?

View all replies (194)

Top

Back