Social Feed

Pixl
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Free To Air (FTA) Discussion
I'm using a Geosat 1100-C attempting to manually program in a channel. I'm asked for a service ID along with the usual Vpid, Apid, and PCRpid. I see everything I need on "The List" except service ID.

Jim
20 Replies · 13913 views
AcWxRadar
I am not sure that I know what the heck I am talking about, but I have a hunch.

Based upon Brian's response, I get the impression that the particular box that the OP has is a special STB that can receive updates to it's software/firmware and sat/TP/Channel list via the satellite feed. In order to facilitate this option properly, you have to enter the Service ID of a or the appropriate channel in order for it (the receiver) to allow the routing of such updates properly into the receiver.

Do you see where I am going with this?

If you don't enter the correct service ID, the auto updates via the satellite feed won't function. In other words, you need to tell the STB to look at a specific channel for such updates/upgrades via the sat by showing it the "path" or navigation route to follow and the SERVICE ID is part of the addressing of that.

I am not sure that this is what they are doing, but it sounds reasonable to me. Otherwise, it's a very good line of bull from me. :D Seriously, though, wouldn't something along this line make sense? At least that is the impression that I got from Brian Gohl's reply earlier in the thread, but I cannot say that I understood it fully or accurately.

RADAR
SatelliteAV
Further explanation of SID purpose for a receiver.

The Service ID is the unique numerical ID that the uplinker has assigned to a specific service. Many receivers have the ability to either scan for updates to channels already scanned into the receiver (Network Scan). Other receivers automatically update changes to existing services without the need to manually rescan. In order for the receiver to update the correct service in the MUX, it must identify the service. The SID provides this identification of the service.

The SID only determines the order of the channels in the channel list when the receiver features this sorting feature.
M
Based upon Brian's response, I get the impression that the particular box that the OP has is a special STB that can receive updates to it's software/firmware and sat/TP/Channel list via the satellite feed. In order to facilitate this option properly, you have to enter the Service ID of a or the appropriate channel in order for it (the receiver) to allow the routing of such updates properly into the receiver.

The GeosatPro receivers have 2 modes
Glorystar and Advanced.

IN the Glorystar mode it will automatically update the software when there is new software out there. Also each Monday it updates with the Glorystar approved channels. If you read the review I did, when you select Glorystar in the manu setup it automatically loads the G* channels from 97 & 101

Advanced mode is for us hobbyists but you can manually update the software by goign to 97W and saying "update". Its a really neat feature. No need to update software via RS232 ports or USB options.
SatelliteAV
The SID feature is not used for the GEOSATpro weekly update process.

Many STB manufacturers offer the network updating. I believe that many of the Fortec Star (Mercury II) and Hyundai (Coolsat 4000) products could sort and update with SID network information. FYI: SID Network updating is widely used in Europe on the Astra / Hotbird Muxes.
B.J.
Further explanation of SID purpose for a receiver.

The Service ID is the unique numerical ID that the uplinker has assigned to a specific service. Many receivers have the ability to either scan for updates to channels already scanned into the receiver (Network Scan). Other receivers automatically update changes to existing services without the need to manually rescan. In order for the receiver to update the correct service in the MUX, it must identify the service. The SID provides this identification of the service.

The SID only determines the order of the channels in the channel list when the receiver features this sorting feature.

Sorry to bring this up again, but I've been doing a bit of studying to try to determine what is really the proper terminology, ie
(1) that Service ID = Channel Number
_OR_
(2) that channel number = "Program Number" = "Service Number"
and "Service ID" = a link to another service such as an EPG which describes all channels.

The first description (1) is what many receivers seem to have adopted, and what SatAV and others have described here.
The second description (2) is what DVB stream analyzers such as TSREADER and some other ones say, when fed a DVB transport stream.

So I searched the net trying to find a document with somewhat official definitions of these terms. I've tried this before, with poor results, because unfortunately, the organizations that generated and keep these specs either charge for downloading their documents or require membership, or both. However I did find TWO documents, which seem pretty definitive on the matter, ie:
http://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2008/n1/23dalmi.pdf
and
http://www.dtv.org.br/download/en-en/ABNTNBR15603_2D1_2007Vc_2008Ing.pdf

The 2nd document, show that data structure for PAT on page 13, PMT on page 14, and SDT on page 15.
The 1st document shows the data structure for the SDT in Fig 3.

Both these documents show the SID (Service Identifier) as being an element in the repeating section of the SDT. The Service Identifier does NOT show up in either the PAT or PMT, however the PAT and PMT include a parameter which the 2nd document calls "Broadcasting Program Number Identifier".

When I capture the raw data from a mux, and look at it with a binary editor, this "Broadcasting Program Number Identifier" is clearly the channel number, so I would have to say that Channel Number= Program Number from this.

Also, I looked at a random Dishnet transponder, ie the 119 12253 transponder, and looked at one of the channels at random, ie WETA.
TSREADER indicates that the "Program Number"=8076 and the "Service ID"=36861 . To make sure that this was in fact the actual data, I captured the raw SDT data from this mux, found the WETA portion of the repeating section, and sure enough, I found 8FFD , which equates to 36861.

Anyway, assuming that these two documents I found are correct, and I have to assume that they are, because they agree with TSREADER, and I'm sure that Rod wrote that program from the official IEEE specs or DVB definitions, it sure looks to me like the term SID or Service Identifier has a completely different meaning from what many receivers and people on this group and others seem to think it means.

I did run into some confusion though, which makes me a little less sure about how this all works. The 36861 number is actually the channel number of the EPG on the Dishnet system. When I tried this a couple days ago, I was able to look at the NIT, and find out what transponder the EPG was on, and it was there (I think). Today, however, I look at the NIT, and it tells me that the 36861 EPG is on 12486, however it isn't there. Also, the SDT entry indicates that the 36861 EPG is on 12486. I am confused as to why it's not there. I'm pretty sure that I checked this out yesterday or a couple days ago, and it WAS there, so if DN receivers use the Service ID, I don't know where they go to get the info when the channel isn't there today. Perhaps it only broadcasts occasionally???

Anyway, I'm still trying to learn how this DVB stuff works on a bit level. I find it pretty interesting. BTW, many/most of the DN channels don't even list a "Service ID", but the ones that did all referred to one of the EPG channels.
B.J.
Well, I have to eat my words before the ink is even dry.

Right after posting the above, I found another document. Actually it's the document that the 2nd document I was referencing above used as a source. It is

http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300468/01.05.01_40/en_300468v010501o.pdf

Well THIS document had pretty much the same data format charts as the other one, HOWEVER, in addition it had a definition of the Service ID in the SDT description. It said the following:

"service_id: This is a 16-bit field which serves as a label to identify this service from any other service within the TS.
The service_id is the same as the program_number in the corresponding program_map_section."

So from this, it seems to indicate pretty clearly that Service ID=Program Number, which is the same as Channel number.

This all now tells me that the receivers that used SID and channel number as the same thing were correct. However TSREADER and other stream analyzers are also correct, because they were identifying the number in the SDT as being the Service ID, and the number in the PAT/PMT as being the Program Number. What this tells me, is that the receivers and analyzers are correct, and the error is with the satellite uplinkers such as Dishnet, and a couple other muxes that used Service ID parameters in the SDT. Ie Dishnet and others are putting a number in there which is NOT the same as the Program Number.

I've run into several muxes that have an SID entry. So far, I don't think I've seen one where it is the same as the Program Number, but I will look on G19, and see what the entries look like there. I have seen a few where they are just a zero or one though, but still different from the channel numbers.

Bottom line is that the sat uplinkers apparently don't follow the spec.
iJustine
Last reply · posted in iJustine
1 Replies · 2 views
T
It's not even where it folds!
SuperDish_Fan23
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!
20 Replies · 485 views
S
That's not really unusual. Cable companies like to the provide the box too. The phone company provided the phones in until the government forced them to allow third-party phones.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
That's not really unusual. Cable companies like to the provide the box too. The phone company provided the phones in until the government forced them to allow third-party phones.
Yes, the Western Electric phones that says "Bell System Property, NOT FOR SALE, Western Electric".
AZ.
AZ.
Yes, the Western Electric phones that says "Bell System Property, NOT FOR SALE, Western Electric".
someone is showing their age
Almighty1
someone is showing their age
LOL. It depends if the person saw it during the years when they were actually still available which is 1968 to 1983 meaning the person could be 43-58 years old or they can even be a few years old if they learned to read and write at a young age and actually saw a telephone with that label somewhere recently just like even here in San Francisco, payphone still exist physically in public places but whether they can be used or not is a different issue. It still looks like this even today:
1792633296785.webp
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
I opened my Radio Shack in Sept 1984 and right about that time they did the whole deregulation thing with the phone companies. I bought TONS of those phones that had been refurbished with a new outer shell. You could throw one of those out of a 3 story high window and it would still work.
That was an interesting time in history. I would have older customers come in and ask about phones.....they were terrified that they were going to get into trouble hooking up a second phone without the phone company knowing about it. One of the funniest episodes of WKRP was the one where Johnny thought the cops were showing up because they had an unregistered phone. I guess younger folks can't conceive of a time when you were limited to the number of phones you could have in your house....and limited to the length of the cord 🤣
navychop
someone is showing their age

You should hear his stories about when rocks were soft and pterodactyls were the new kid on the block!
dishstaller
One of the funniest episodes of WKRP was the one where Johnny thought the cops were showing up because they had an unregistered phone.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA0yZ1nrm6M&pp=ygUPd2tycCBwaG9uZSBjb3Bz
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
He was 71 yrs old. One of my favorite songs is Seminole Wind....the violin is killer.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8sh9P3X33w
5 Replies · 42 views
FTA4PA
Rest In Peace
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
M
I Wish I Could Have Been There is an amazing song. Rest in peace Mr Anderson.
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
Bobby
Rest in peace.
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
comfortably_numb
Hope you're out there Swingin', John.
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
dishstaller
I Wish I Could Have Been There is an amazing song.
That's one of those songs that hits a little too close to home for me. I like the song but just can't listen to it. It's kinda like that song "Daddy never was the Cadillac kind".....reminds me too much of my Grandfather who died Feb 18, 1995.
N
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
My OTA is not working anymore. This started after the latest update. I have the OTA dongle with a OTA antenna that I've been using for years. My hopper does not recognize the dongle anymore and when I go to the OTA setting, it has a screen that says to plug a dongle into the USB. I tried unplugging and plugging back, in the same usb port and other ports. The Hopper does not recognize it. Anyone have same issue?
201 Replies · 5101 views
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
Did you people having this issue contact Brittany yet? Shes trying to keep track of things and it would be good for you to contact her as maybe she can get this somewhere and get fixed.

Now while unofficial, I am hearing this issue wasn't caused by DISH's software team, but was caused by a chipset driver update that seemes to have hosed some older USB devices. If this is indeed the case I can see why DISH didn't know and why they are slow in fixing it as they need the chipset company to fix its drivers and release them to DISH so they can be pushed out to all.

DISH does not hate you guys nor do they want you to buy new USB dongles. I am rather sure they didn't even know this was an issue until they saw it posted.

Again contact Brittany if you are having this issue, so she has your info and hopefully she can do something for you to keep you happy. :)
bookworm370
Did you people having this issue contact Brittany yet? Shes trying to keep track of things and it would be good for you to contact her as maybe she can get this somewhere and get fixed.

Now while unofficial, I am hearing this issue wasn't caused by DISH's software team, but was caused by a chipset driver update that seemes to have hosed some older USB devices. If this is indeed the case I can see why DISH didn't know and why they are slow in fixing it as they need the chipset company to fix its drivers and release them to DISH so they can be pushed out to all.

DISH does not hate you guys nor do they want you to buy new USB dongles. I am rather sure they didn't even know this was an issue until they saw it posted.

Again contact Brittany if you are having this issue, so she has your info and hopefully she can do something for you to keep you happy. :)
Thanks, but until they do, can't Dish just revert to the old driver that worked? Then test the new driver when delivered,d before pushing it again.

But then what does an old CIO know! I've only reamed quite a few buttholes from my people that didn't do that! ;)
S
Thanks, but until they do, can't Dish just revert to the old driver that worked? Then test the new driver when delivered,d before pushing it again.

But then what does an old CIO know! I've only reamed quite a few buttholes from my people that didn't do that! ;)
dish can't revert back to older drivers or updates. although just one reason not to buy the ota dongle!!!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
ppappas
dish can't revert back to older drivers or updates. although just one reason not to buy the ota dongle!!!
They can absolutely put the old driver back if they wanted. This is an embedded software environment in which they have total control. All they have to do if build a new version of firmware with the old OTA driver and test it of course. They just don't want to spend the resources doing so. If they are not going to continue supporting the single tuner adapter, then they have to say so.
Almighty1
They can absolutely put the old driver back if they wanted. This is an embedded software environment in which they have total control. All they have to do if build a new version of firmware with the old OTA driver and test it of course. They just don't want to spend the resources doing so. If they are not going to continue supporting the single tuner adapter, then they have to say so.
Unless of course they didn't keep a copy of the old drivers and can no longer get it. Then there is always the their support for the product is EOL after a x amount of time so it will make the consumer have to buy the current product offering.
B
Anyone heard any updates on this, I'm still having the issue so thought I'd check in.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
Anyone heard any updates on this, I'm still having the issue so thought I'd check in.
No updates but if you can get DISH Technical Operations to roll you back to H710 or earlier even though H708 would be best because it also eliminates another problem like in this comment, you will also no longer have the problem as long as you don't update manually or forced to any new version until the problem is fixed as the problem started in H711 and still exist in H712 and H713.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
Installed an off-air antenna a couple days ago for a customer who had just cancelled his Dish service. He had a dual off-air adapter and gave it to me. Cool. I'll keep it on the truck....might come in handy. Got to admit I don't watch anything as far as live tv goes anymore. Even if we have severe weather, our local channels will have a live feed on Youtube.
navychop
In other news, it was announced that the software fix for the two tin cans and a string will not be forthcoming. A hardware fix is required. However, that fix will let you receive stations from a gazillion miles away.

Truck roll charges may apply. Two year commitment required.
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
6 Replies · 204 views
navychop
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
TRG
TRG
17 years ago the US turned off analog OTA signals in favor of digital broadcasting. Now the push is ATSC 3 "Nextgen TV". But nobody seems to be able to agree on DRM implementation protocols. People don't want to hook their TV up to the internet in order to watch over the air TV. At least I don't. With all the data they collect about your viewing habits the box should be given away at no cost.
navychop
Comb your hair.
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA and navychop
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 6 views